Clayton industries peter arnell country manager for italy

Review the case study entitled “Clayton Industries, Inc.: Peter Arnell” by Christopher Bartlett and Benjamin Barlow. Respond to the case study by detailing the specific issues in the case and highlight the recommendations or course of actions you would recommend given the case scenario. Case Study should follow APA formatting and will be graded using rubric in learning module.Graduate Case Study Rubric Graduate Case Study Rubric Criteria Identification of the main issues and/or problems 3-5 issues and/or problems. 10% Literature research & review Majority (at least 60% or higher) of articles and/or references must be within last 10 years. 15% Analysis of the key issues All issues must be analyzed. 25% Alternative solutions and/or options Provide method of comparison between alternatives. 20% Ratings Excellent - Identifies and understands all the main issues in the case study. 5.0 pts Proficient - Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study. 3.0 pts Basic - Identifies and understands some of the main issues in the case study. 2.0 pts Poor - Ide understand main issue study. 0.0 pts Excellent research with clearly documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts and good (3 or more) use of corroborating sources. 5.0 pts Good research and documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts and some (2 or more) use of corroborating sources. 3.0 pts Limited research and associations between the problems or questions and key course concepts and little (1 or more) use of corroborating sources. 2.0 pts Insightful and thorough analysis of all the key issues. 5.0 pts Insightful and thorough analysis of most of the key issues. 3.0 pts Insightful and thorough analysis of some of the key issues. 2.0 pts Alternatives cover all the key issues with method to evaluate all equally. 5.0 pts Alternatives cover most of the key issues with method to evaluate. 3.0 pts Alternatives cover some of the key issues with method to evaluate. 2.0 pts Incomple of alterna no evalua 0.0 pts Well-reasoned, logical, relevant observations and recommendations on effective solutions to most of the problems/issues. 5.0 pts Solid, well-thought out observations and recommendations on effective solutions to many of the problems/issues. 3.0 pts Shallow observations and recommendations on effective solutions to some of the problems/issues. 2.0 pts Superficia observatio recommen effective s few of the problems/ 0.0 pts Writing is totally free of grammar & spelling errors. Clear, concise and creative presentation of ideas and properly referenced. 5.0 pts There are few spelling or grammatical errors. Most ideas are clearly presented and references are used. 3.0 pts There are several spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented. References are sporadic or not used. 2.0 pts There are spelling e grammati Ideas are h follow. Re not used. 0.0 pts Incomple and assoc between t or questio course co no use of corrobora 0.0 pts Incom analys issues. 0.0 pts Observations and/or recommendations on effective solutions Include short-term and long-term recommendations; included should be realistic time frames, designation of roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders and an appropriate evaluation program. 20% Writing Skills/Professional Presentation Includes overall composition, structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 10% Total Points: 30.0 ..