Organizations, while managing
change, can deploy the tools for change management such as six sigma and TPM (Total
Productive Maintenance) to remove redundancies and rework’s elimination. The
main objective ofttimes to manage machine or equipment so that it could deliver
the most and eliminate the machine downtime completely in all forms. On the
other hand, Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) plays a vital role in
improving the manufacturing process’s efficiency that, in turn, ensures consistency,
quality, and productivity. OEE is of the most common performance evaluation
method in manufacturing industries. Further OEE enables key productivity
losses’ categorization that occur within the process of manufacturing. OEE, by
definition, is a multiplication of performance, quality, and availability that
can be calculated by the following formula:
OEE = Performance Quality × Availability
The above three parameters can be
further calculated by the following formulas:
This formula is about to find out
the performance that is used in any organization to calculate performance. For
calculating the performance
The ideal cycle time is divided
with the total pieces.
And as from the further
calculation it can be seen that the ideal cycle time is equal to the ideal
runtime and that is divided by the operating time of the equipment that is used
for the production line.
Now calculating the overall
performance of the organization and that is equal to the total pieces divided
by the operating time and this whole factor is further divided by the ideal
runtime.
To find the total quality of the
organization and their production line and that is calculated by dividing the
good pieces with the total pieces means that by dividing the good pieces from
the total pieces the organization can able to find the total quality of their
production line.
In the above figure there is
discussion about the six major losses to the equipment effectiveness.
In the first part there is
formula to calculate the overall equipment effectiveness as well as that is
equal to the product of performance availability efficiency plus the third one
is the quality.
The six major losses in an
organization as well as that are according to losses to equipment
effectiveness.
The first two losses are
regarding availability plus that includes when equipment is failed so for this
if the maintenance manager don’t have the worker when any equipment is failed.
When equipment is failed so because of this the production line stops. The
second loss regarding the availability is the adjustments and set-ups and if
the setup is not good and the production manager don’t have the worker who can
able to adjust the machine. If there is no availability of that worker so
production line will be stopped.
The next two losses are regarding
the failure in the efficiency of performance.
When performance efficiency is
weak so this means that production line speed will be reduced.
The next loss in performance
efficiency the quality of a production line reduced efficiency.
The last two major losses are
regarding to the quality of the production line
When there is no quality in a
production line so because of this performance efficiency will be reduced.
The next major loss due to
quality is the startup losses and because of this startup loss a quality
affects because quality is equal to the good pieces are divided by the total
pieces.
In this paper, a simulation model
for OEE computation is designed and implemented in this paper. XML files
created by multiple criteria-based cost-optimized production lines such as WIP
(Work in Progress) inventory minimization, application of Theory of constraint,
and idle time minimization are used to derive the input data needed for a
model. This means that, these XML lines easily been created through the use of
cost optimization production line. Moreover, both fuzzy model and crisp model
are compared and implemented in this paper.
References of A Simulation Model for Overall Equipment Effectiveness of
a Generic Production Line
[
|
G.
R. Naik, V. Raikar and P. Naik, "A Simulation Model for Overall
Equipment Effectiveness of a Generic Production Line," IOSR Journal
of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 52-63, 2015.
|
|
A.
Sharma, R. Maheshwari, A. Juneja and J. P. Rajput, "Calculation and
Improvement of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) of A Model Machine in A
Production Line," International Journal for Research in Applied
Science & Engineering Technology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1389-1395, 2017.
|
|
R.
Wudhikarn, "A Framework for Integrating Overall Equipment Effectiveness
with Analytic Network Process Method," International Journal of
Innovation, Management and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 351-355, 2013.
|
|
E.
Battistoni, A. Bonacelli, A. F. Colladon and M. M. Schiraldi, "An
Analysis of the Effect of Operations Management Practices on
Performance," Management Practices on Performance, pp. 1-11,
2013.
|
|
M.
A. ROSE K., "FACTORS CONSIDERED IMPORTANT BY LARGE SUPERMARKETS IN
SELECTING THEIR SUPPLIERS OF MERCHANDISE: A CASE OF LARGE SUPERMARKETS IN
NAIROBI /," MANAGEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTERS OF BUSINESS AND
ADMINISTRATION (MBA), DEGREE, FACULTY OF COMMERCE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI, 2001.
|
|
S.
A. Dellana and J. F. Kros, "An exploration of quality management
practices, perceptions and program maturity in the supply chain," International
Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 34 Issue: 6, pp.
786-806, 2014.
|
|
M.
Harju, "SUPPLIER SELECTION PROCESS," ALMACO Group: An example of
ship building industry, 2010.
|
|
Johnson,
Purchasing and supply management., 14th edition. ed., New York.: McGraw-Hill
Education,, 2011.
|
|
B.
Eldridge, "Supplier Management: Six Steps to Selecting the Right
Supplier," September 2012. [Online]. Available:
https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/augustseptember-2012/supplier-management-six-steps-to-selecting-the-right-supplier/.
|
|
H.
Waterman, "UK Supermarket CSR Reports:A Comparison Using Environmental
and Social Reporting Guidelines," 2007.
|