Disposable
diapers were introduced an innovative product that all sudden win the market
shares of other all kinds of diapers including cloth and homemade diapers. The
case study is about the condition of the disposable diaper industry until 1974.
According to the records, disposable diapers were the most frequently and
largest consumed product in the US during 1966. Afterward, the largest sales of
disposable diapers recorded hundreds of million profit in a single fiscal year.
In the present work, case study analysis is presented to project the industry
history and situation of several big companies in the US and other geographical
markets. The analysis also covers the financial analysis of the industry to
elaborate on the sales record of big companies.
Case Study Analysis of Disposable diapers
Historical
analysis of diaper industry prior to 1966 shows that there were almost 400
companies working to produce cloth diapers. Disposable diapers were introduced
as an innovative product in the US during 1966 but at very high prices by the
big names Parke Davis, Kendall, and Chicopee Mills. High prices caused a high
switching cost and low market demand. While in Europe the situation was quite
different. Prices were relatively low and demand was at growth trend. The
situation also got changed in US industry when P&G Pamper brand started
taking interest in disposable diapers. At that time the only major problem was
the high cost of manufacturing. In the beginning, P&G Company managed to
sell each pamper at $5.5 price.
Another
famous company Johnson and Johnson took a decision to get entrance in
disposable diaper with their brand Johnson brand against Pamper brand.
Hydrophobic plastic in Johnson disposable diaper supported an increase in the
sales of their product. Somehow, the disposable diaper product was not only a
success-oriented product. A number of companies tried to get entrance in this
market to take leverage of the high market demand but failed to attempt so. For
instance, Chicopee Chux, Baby Scott and Bordan discontinued their manufacturing
operations of disposable diapers after continuous failure to win a secure
position in the targeted market.
While on the
other hand, the case study also presented that a number of brands introduced
variety in the disposable diaper product line having differentiation regarding
quality, performance characteristics, sizes, and prices. Analyzing market
demand we can say that it was on a continuous increase. Analysis indicates that
the total number of baby birth was also most decreasing on a continuous basis
from 1966 to 1973 but still the percentage of sales was increasing with the
passage of time. For instance, in 1966 total baby birth was recorded as $3.64
million and at that time total sales of the diaper were $10 million. While on
the other hand, the situation was quite different in 1973. Market demand was
increased up to $370 million and the total number of baby birth recorded that
year was limited to only $3.14 million.
The rapid increase was caused by the decrease
in the prices of disposable diapers and frequent shift in the market to use disposable
diapers rather than using cloth and other kinds of diapers. The Case study also
presented information about diaper per unit estimated manufacturing cost to
elaborate on the profit margin secured by the manufacturing companies.
Numerical information presents that raw material, manufacturing labor cost, and
all other relevant direct and indirect manufacturing cost were 50% of the total
prices. While the ratio of total earned profit limited to 25% only ($.10 per
product only). A number of companies also took advantage in the market by
supporting their products with high marketing and advertisement budget. Kendall
brand spent $313.5 thousand (in 1966), Colgate Palmolive $1370.7 thousand (in
1976), and P&G spent $8927.7 thousand (in 1976) to market and advertise
their product. Somehow from these P&G took the maximum profit outcomes on
their sales of disposable diapers.