What is Natural Law Theory? What objections to this theory are raised in our two textbooks? Do you think this theory is plausible? Why or why not?

Natural law theory is a lawful theory that identifies the link between human morality and law. This example discovers some of the natural law theory principles, and also offers the ethical scenarios instances and how the theory of natural law would try to determine those problems. This theory also stated that the law must be based on ethics and morality. The Natural Law Theory states that the morality and law are linked with each other deeply, and the whole legal system is also functions on morality basis and not because of the effect of an authority or an emperor. In the textbook, some of the objections can be seen to the Natural Law Theory by realizing that the sense of morality is discharged in particular circumstances (Taylor, 2014).

Whereas the obligations that are related to the ethics might go in contradiction of the maximum good for a large number of people, the practical approach shall uphold a similar thing. I think Natural Law theory is reasonable as humans have a distinctive requirement to confirm the wrongs and rights about things and to be administered by the concepts of morality. The natural law is quite perusable because it is also like the human to find the right way to do the virtues. It is obvious that the human by birth have the concepts of good and bad things and depending on the acts of the person the judgment of about the person being good and bad also made.  In the natural law theory as far as the law is a concern, there can be sometimes found some objections as in the text book there is some contradiction in the point of view of different philosophers concerning natural law theory.