The
aim of this paper is to demonstrate the financial performance of the Microsoft Corporation
and how much dividend the corporation is providing on its stocks. Microsoft Corporation
is chosen to because it is one of the largest organizations in the world and the
corporation has paid the dividend in the past to its shareholders. Microsoft Corporation
is a multi nation corporation that deals in technology. The headquarter of the
corporation is located in the city of Redmond Washington. The products of the
company include computer software, electronics, PC (Personal Computers), Web
browsers, game consoles and operating systems. The Windows operating system is
the most renowned operating system in the world and used by many people. The
corporation was established in the year 1975. According to the 2016 statistics
the company has employed 124000 employees. The services which are given by the
company include Windows Store, Windows Update Office 365 and many other
services. Over the past many years, the corporation has achieved success and
company has experienced growth however the recent changes such as the change in
tax code will affect the Microsoft Corporation. Due to the changes in tax laws,
the company financials will disturb (BARAM, 2017).
Financial
Analysis Managerial Finance
|
AAPL
|
MSFT
|
GOOG
|
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
EPS
|
1.39
|
1.55
|
2.74
|
2.12
|
28.32
|
18.27
|
Dividend Yield
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
3.36%
|
3.31%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Dupont Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA
|
14.93%
|
13.87%
|
9.08%
|
9.75%
|
12.37%
|
6.94%
|
ROE
|
36.90%
|
36.87%
|
22.09%
|
29.37%
|
15.02%
|
8.69%
|
Profit Margin
|
21.19%
|
21.09%
|
19.69%
|
23.57%
|
21.58%
|
11.42%
|
Gross Margin
|
39.08%
|
38.47%
|
61.58%
|
61.91%
|
61.08%
|
58.88%
|
P/E ratio
|
8.50%
|
11.48%
|
23.73%
|
30.23%
|
28.24%
|
35.01%
|
P/B ratio
|
2.89%
|
4.01%
|
6.83%
|
7.35%
|
16.48%
|
20.28%
|
Debt to Equity
|
0.59
|
0.73
|
0.57
|
1.05
|
0.03
|
0.02
|
Debt ratio
|
0.37
|
0.42
|
0.36
|
0.51
|
0.03
|
0.02
|
Operating Cash Flows
|
$ 65,824
|
$ 65,598
|
$ 33,325
|
$ 39,507
|
$ 36,036
|
$ 37,091
|
Investing Cash Flows
|
$
(45,977)
|
$
46,446
|
$(23,950)
|
$(46,781)
|
$(31,165)
|
$(31,401)
|
Financing Cash Flows
|
$ (20,483)
|
$ (17,347)
|
$ (8,393)
|
$ 8,408
|
$ (8,332)
|
$ (8,298)
|
The
above financial analysis indicates a good financial performance however when
the financial performance is compared with its competitors it can be seen that
the competitors have performed well in various aspects. The ROA of the Google Corporation
is higher in 2016 than the Microsoft (Brigham & Houston, 2015). Apple corporations
ROA is also better than the Microsoft in both 2016 and 2017. The operating cash
flow which shows the actual cash generated by the corporations is also not
impressive when compared to its competitors. Apple corporations operating cash
flow is almost double than Microsoft (Horne & John M. Wachowicz, 2000).
Dividend
Policy Managerial Finance
The
tech companies need to improve the dividend policy so that they can attract
investors. The companies do pay dividend however they have to think about
regular payments so that the share prices can increase with the passage of
time. The dividend policy of the Microsoft and other Tech companies like Apple
is not much different. The companies have to pay the dividend to increase the
shareholder's wealth and to attract investment. The main aim of the investors
is to increase their wealth or to receive a significant amount of dividend.
When the investors are not going to receive dividend than it will become
difficult for the corporations to attract investors in the future. This means
that a better dividend policy is needed in Microsoft Corporation (Waters, 2010).
Capital
Structure Managerial Finance
The capital structure means how the
corporations have financed their operations. If the capital structure of
Microsoft Corporation is analyzed than it can be seen that the company is
financed through debt and equity. The capital structure of the corporation must
be optimum so that the cost of capital can be lowered and company can manage
it's financial efficiently. If the capital structure of the company is not
optimum than the company can face serious consequences such as failure in
payment of debt. The capital structure of Microsoft is analyzed than it can be
seen that its amount of debt is higher than its competitors. The company in
future have to take care of its debt amount so that it can repay it
effectively. Too much debt is not good for any corporation (Pinder-Ayres, 2016).
Source: https://image.slidesharecdn.com/capitalstructure-140613012526-phpapp01/95/capital-structure-1-638.jpg?cb=1402623120
Conclusion
on Managerial Finance
If
all the above discussion is summarized than it is evident that the above
financial analysis indicates a good financial performance however when the
financial performance is compared with its competitors it can be seen that the
competitors have performed well in various aspects. The ROA of the Google
Corporation is higher in 2016 than the Microsoft. Apple corporations ROA is also
better than the Microsoft in both 2016 and 2017. The dividend policy of the
Microsoft and other Tech companies like Apple is not much different. The
companies have to pay the dividend to increase the shareholder's wealth and to
attract investment. The main aim of the investors is to increase their wealth
or to receive a significant amount of dividend.
If
the capital structure of the company is not optimum than the company can face
serious consequences such as failure in payment of debt. The capital structure
of Microsoft is analyzed than it can be seen that its amount of debt is higher
than its competitors. The company in future have to take care of its debt
amount so that it can repay it effectively. Too much debt is not good for any
corporation.
References
of managerial finance
BARAM, M. (2017). How The Tax Bill Will Impact
Silicon Valley: Great For Big Tech, Good For Startups. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/40510564/how-the-tax-bill-will-impact-silicon-valley-great-for-big-tech-good-for-startups
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2015). Financial
Management. Cengage Learning.
Horne, J. C., & John M. Wachowicz, J. (2000). Fundamentals
of Financial Management and PH Finance Center CD (11 ed.). Prentice Hall.
Pinder-Ayres, B. (2016). Financial Management Creative
Business Essential. RIBA Publishing.
Waters, R. (2010). Why tech companies need the discipline
of a dividend. Retrieved from
https://www.ft.com/content/ae39fe74-e772-11df-b5b4-00144feab49a
Appendix