If
all the above liquidity analysis is summarized than it can be said that
currently, the organization is in the position to pay its short term
obligations efficiently. The liquidity ratios of Woodside have experienced fluctuation
in the 5 year period which might not be a good thing for the organization. It
is suggested that the organization should maintain enough cash from which it
can quickly pay its loan back. In addition, the organization should not keep
more money in the organization because excess cash will not generate any
profit. The excess money should be invested somewhere to earn a significant
amount of return.
Solvency Analysis of Wood side Petroleum
The
solvency ratios show how efficiently the organization is managing its long term
debt. The corporations financed their assets from debt & equity. It is
always said that the corporations should maintain optimum capital structure
because through optimum capital structure the cost of capital decreases. The key solvency ratios which the
corporations used for evaluating the solvency condition include debt to equity
ratio, financial leverage ratio, total debt ratio and long term debt to equity
ratio. It is highly essential for investors to evaluate the solvency of the
organization before investment. Such corporations who have taken too much debt
and experiencing profitability problems are not considered suitable for the
investment. Therefore financing the assets from both debt 7 equity are
preferred.
Key Ratios -> Financial Health
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Items (in %)
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Latest Qtr
|
Cash & Short-Term Investments
|
13.57
|
0.51
|
1.15
|
1.25
|
6.38
|
6.38
|
Accounts Receivable
|
1.98
|
2.05
|
1.8
|
1.9
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
Inventory
|
1.03
|
0.71
|
0.6
|
0.73
|
0.57
|
0.57
|
Other Current Assets
|
0.2
|
1.25
|
0.08
|
0.11
|
0.15
|
0.15
|
Total Current Assets
|
16.78
|
4.53
|
3.64
|
3.99
|
8.9
|
8.9
|
Net PP&E
|
78.4
|
91.61
|
91.6
|
90.82
|
85.81
|
85.81
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Assets
|
4.81
|
3.86
|
4.77
|
5.19
|
5.29
|
5.29
|
Total Assets
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Accounts Payable
|
1.23
|
1.23
|
0.82
|
0.96
|
0.81
|
0.81
|
Short-Term Debt
|
2.71
|
0.33
|
0.32
|
0.31
|
0.48
|
0.48
|
Taxes Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Short-Term Liabilities
|
4.41
|
4.1
|
2.88
|
3.15
|
2.69
|
2.69
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
8.35
|
5.66
|
4.02
|
4.43
|
3.98
|
3.98
|
Long-Term Debt
|
8.42
|
18.94
|
20.46
|
20.3
|
15.28
|
15.28
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
15.16
|
13.65
|
13.5
|
14.02
|
14.13
|
14.13
|
Total Liabilities
|
31.93
|
38.26
|
37.99
|
38.75
|
33.39
|
33.39
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
68.07
|
61.74
|
62.01
|
61.25
|
66.61
|
66.61
|
Total Liabilities & Equity
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Source:
http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=WPL®ion=aus&culture=en-US
Debt to Equity Ratio of
Woodside Petroleum
The
debt to equity ratio provides detail information about the organization’s
financial leverage. Through the debt to equity ratio, it can be known how much
debt the corporation has taken for financing its assets. Through the debt to
equity ratio, the portion of the obligation of the corporation can be
critically analyzed. The organizations that are highly leveraged are not
considered suitable by investors because too much amount of debt could lead to
financial problems in the future. Many organizations more focus on long term
debt than short term debt because the risk of long term debt differs from the
risk of short term debts. The formula of debt to equity ratio is explained
below:
Financial Health
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Financial Leverage
|
1.52
|
1.68
|
1.67
|
1.69
|
1.55
|
Debt/Equity
|
0.12
|
0.31
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
0.23
|
The
debt to equity ratio of Woodside organization was 0.12 in the year 2014 which increased
in the 5 year period. However, the condition of debt remains stable in the 5
year period. The Woodside Corporation is more financed through equity than the debt
which is a good sign. Through the debt, to equity ratio, it can be said that
the corporation is not highly leveraged and the company have the ability to pay
its long term loans quickly. Currently,
the capital structure of the organization is optimum because the organization
debt is in stable condition. It is recommended that the corporation not to take
much debt in the future because it will have a significant impact on financial
performance. For attracting the
investors in the organization, the organization can keep lower debt because
investors usually prefer such organizations where they can get maximum return.
With a high level of debt, the company might not be able to provide more return
(Fridson and Alvarez).
Financial leverage Ratio
of Woodside Petroleum
Financial Health
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Latest Qtr
|
Financial Leverage
|
1.52
|
1.68
|
1.67
|
1.69
|
1.55
|
1.55
|
Debt/Equity
|
0.12
|
0.31
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
The
financial leverage ratios show how much assets in the corporation are financed
through debt. Through the financial leverage ratio, the degree of financial
leverage is assessed. The formula of the financial leverage ratio is explained
below:
The
financial leverage ratio of Woodside Corporation indicates that the
organization has not financed much of its assets with debt. Most of the assets
are financed through equity.
Debt ratio of Woodside
Petroleum
Liquidity/Financial Health
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Debt/Equity
|
0.12
|
0.31
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
0.23
|
Debt Ratio
|
0.34
|
0.40
|
0.40
|
0.41
|
0.35
|
The
debt ratio shows the amount of debt compared to total assets. The high amount
of debt indicates that the organization is highly leveraged and the financial
risk is higher. The high debt ratio also shows that the organization have more
debt rather than assets. The formula of debt ratio is mentioned as follows:
The
debt ratio of Woodside Corporation shows that the corporations’ debt is lower
than their total assets. The corporation debt is in stable condition.
Summary of Solvency Analysis
of Woodside Petroleum
The
solvency ratios of the Woodside Corporation indicates that the organization is
not much financially leveraged. The corporation’s amount of debt is low, and
the organization can quickly pay its long term obligations. It is suggested
that the organization should maintain its capital structure in the upcoming
years so that not only the cost of capital remains low but also the
organization will able to attract more investors in the organization. Overall
the solvency ratios are showing the positive sign for the organization (Needles and Powers).
Common Size Analysis of Woodside Petroleum
WOODSIDE PETROLEUM
LTD (WPL) CashFlowFlag INCOME
STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fiscal year ends in
December. AUD in millions except per share data.
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Revenue
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
Cost of revenue
|
19.60%
|
31.37%
|
22.61%
|
20.18%
|
22.05%
|
22.05%
|
Gross profit
|
80.40%
|
68.63%
|
77.39%
|
79.82%
|
77.95%
|
77.95%
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, General and
administrative
|
1.92%
|
0.56%
|
3.22%
|
2.51%
|
1.94%
|
1.94%
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
19.66%
|
30.16%
|
31.91%
|
30.16%
|
27.28%
|
27.28%
|
Interest expense
|
2.39%
|
1.77%
|
1.35%
|
2.39%
|
4.06%
|
4.06%
|
Other operating expenses
|
9.23%
|
29.07%
|
8.51%
|
5.00%
|
5.28%
|
5.28%
|
Total costs and expenses
|
33.21%
|
61.55%
|
45.00%
|
40.06%
|
38.56%
|
38.56%
|
Income before income
taxes
|
47.20%
|
7.08%
|
32.40%
|
39.76%
|
39.39%
|
39.39%
|
Provision for income
taxes
|
13.36%
|
4.83%
|
8.87%
|
11.32%
|
11.81%
|
11.81%
|
Other income
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Net income from
continuing operations
|
33.84%
|
2.25%
|
23.53%
|
28.43%
|
27.58%
|
27.58%
|
Other
|
-1.37%
|
-1.73%
|
-2.54%
|
-2.44%
|
-1.94%
|
-1.94%
|
Net income
|
32.47%
|
0.52%
|
20.99%
|
26.00%
|
25.64%
|
25.64%
|
Net income available to
common shareholders
|
32.47%
|
0.52%
|
20.99%
|
26.00%
|
25.64%
|
25.64%
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
3.53
|
0.04
|
1.42
|
1.54
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
Diluted
|
3.53
|
0.04
|
1.42
|
1.54
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
834
|
834
|
846
|
852
|
921
|
921
|
Diluted
|
834
|
834
|
846
|
852
|
921
|
921
|
EBITDA
|
69.25%
|
39.01%
|
65.67%
|
72.30%
|
70.73%
|
70.73%
|
In
the above table the income statement of Woodside organization can be seen. All the
figures are presented in percentage form and it can be seen that the profit of
the organization is experiencing decline over the years.
WOODSIDE PETROLEUM
LTD (WPL) CashFlowFlag BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fiscal year ends in
December. AUD in millions except per share data.
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
13.57%
|
0.51%
|
1.15%
|
1.25%
|
6.18%
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
0.20%
|
Total cash
|
13.57%
|
0.51%
|
1.15%
|
1.25%
|
6.38%
|
Receivables
|
1.98%
|
2.05%
|
1.80%
|
1.90%
|
1.80%
|
Inventories
|
1.03%
|
0.71%
|
0.60%
|
0.73%
|
0.57%
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
0.44%
|
0.01%
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
0.20%
|
0.81%
|
0.07%
|
0.11%
|
0.15%
|
Total current assets
|
16.78%
|
4.53%
|
3.64%
|
3.99%
|
8.90%
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant and
equipment
|
120.21%
|
139.99%
|
143.26%
|
145.52%
|
141.66%
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
-41.80%
|
-48.38%
|
-51.66%
|
-54.70%
|
-55.85%
|
Net property, plant and
equipment
|
78.40%
|
91.61%
|
91.60%
|
90.82%
|
85.81%
|
Equity and other
investments
|
0.12%
|
0.13%
|
0.12%
|
0.12%
|
0.11%
|
Deferred income taxes
|
4.37%
|
3.23%
|
3.90%
|
4.43%
|
4.35%
|
Other long-term assets
|
0.32%
|
0.50%
|
0.75%
|
0.64%
|
0.83%
|
Total non-current assets
|
83.22%
|
95.47%
|
96.36%
|
96.01%
|
91.10%
|
Total assets
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
Liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
1.19%
|
1.19%
|
0.80%
|
0.93%
|
0.78%
|
Short-term debt
|
2.61%
|
0.32%
|
0.31%
|
0.30%
|
0.47%
|
Deferred income taxes
|
1.83%
|
|
0.37%
|
0.24%
|
0.27%
|
Deferred revenues
|
0.30%
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
2.13%
|
3.96%
|
2.42%
|
2.81%
|
2.33%
|
Total current liabilities
|
8.06%
|
5.47%
|
3.89%
|
4.28%
|
3.86%
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
8.13%
|
18.31%
|
19.78%
|
19.64%
|
14.81%
|
Deferred taxes liabilities
|
6.80%
|
5.83%
|
6.37%
|
7.08%
|
7.61%
|
Deferred revenues
|
0.40%
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other
postretirement benefits
|
0.14%
|
0.11%
|
0.12%
|
0.11%
|
0.09%
|
Minority interest
|
3.47%
|
3.35%
|
3.32%
|
3.27%
|
3.08%
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
7.30%
|
7.25%
|
6.56%
|
6.37%
|
5.99%
|
Total non-current
liabilities
|
26.23%
|
34.85%
|
36.16%
|
36.47%
|
31.58%
|
Total liabilities
|
34.29%
|
40.32%
|
40.05%
|
40.75%
|
35.44%
|
Stockholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
27.19%
|
27.46%
|
27.95%
|
27.24%
|
32.78%
|
Other equity
|
0.97%
|
0.67%
|
-0.12%
|
0.67%
|
0.59%
|
Retained earnings
|
34.86%
|
28.29%
|
28.16%
|
28.22%
|
28.26%
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
2.69%
|
3.26%
|
3.96%
|
3.12%
|
2.93%
|
Total Stockholders'
equity
|
65.71%
|
59.68%
|
59.95%
|
59.25%
|
64.56%
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
Through
analyzing the common size balance sheet it can be seen that the current assets
and long-term liabilities of the organization has experienced growth.
Conclusion on Woodside Petroleum
If
all the above discussion is summarized than it is evident that the organization
is in the position to pay its short term obligations efficiently. The liquidity
ratios of Woodside have experienced fluctuation in the 5 year period which
might not be a good thing for the organization. It is suggested that the
organization should maintain enough cash from which it can easily pay its loan
back. However, the key profitability ratios such as ROE, ROA and Net profit
margin are showing a declining trend over the 5 year period. The corporation has
the opportunity to improve its profit by utilizing the assets more efficiently.
Woodside can minimize its costs and can increase revenue for further increasing
the earnings of the corporation. For sustaining in the long run, it is highly important
that the organization should improve its profits.
References of Woodside Petroleum
Atrill, Peter. Financial Management for Decision
Makers . 7. Pearson Higher Ed, 2014.
Christoffersen, Peter. Elements
of Financial Risk Management. Academic Press, 2011.
Erickson, K.H. Financial
Risk Management: A Simple Introduction. K.H. Erickson, 2014.
Fridson, Martin S. and
Fernando Alvarez. Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide.
John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Higgins. Analysis for
Financial Management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2007.
Melville, Alan. International
Financial Reporting: A Practical Guide . 6. Pearson Higher Ed, 2017.
Needles, Belverd E. and
Marian Powers. Financial Accounting . Cengage Learning, 2010.
Pandey, I.M. Financial
Management. Vikas Publishing House, 2015.
Robinson, Thomas R., et
al. International Financial Statement Analysis, Third Edition (CFA Institute
Investment Series) . 3. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
SINHA, GOKUL. FINANCIAL
STATEMENT ANALYSIS . PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, 2012.