The way management of an organization like top line manager, department heads or supervisors handle different matters and situations and employees are considered their style of management. different kinds of management styles prevail in the corporate sector around the globe i.e democratic or participative management style, Bureaucratic style of management, Autocratic management, Laissez-faire management every style has its own pros and cons .it is essential and important for the management that which style would be beneficial for them to follow, some time they chose a single style in a static way or some time different style at the same time for different situations (Bryman).
References of Management Styles of JBS Australia

            A good manager did not always order people what to do but use different style according to prevailed situation, so in case of JBS their success depends on their style of management and how they treat their workforce or employees, because to get the work done for to achieve their goals is very technical things in this modern era of information technology. Workforce and knowledge worker nowadays are well aware and educated they have more options to choose in the market and have better alternatives available for them ,so in this situation where there are tough competitions in the market no organization wants to lose their market share along with their knowledge workers. (Purcell)

            JBS Australia is large volume organization with positive goodwill .it practices duel management style as democratic and Bureaucratic for labor and executive class. Before making any decision the managers and supervisor of different production and processing units of JBS exhibit participative or democratic attitude and consults their team while maintaining overall control. They dedicate authority by providing exact job descriptions (JDs) to team members. They keep monitoring them that the process should be done according to the prescribed way because they know that they itself have ultimate responsibility (Cox).

            This democratic or participative management style has pros and cons as well ,consulting with their team of experts and knowledge workers can help management to identify problem early and at initial stages, so that the problems can rectify early ,because time is money in modern business strategy and good, healthy, errorless products gives an organization a competitive edge over its rivals and better communication with our employees and team boost the morale of workforce and motivate them to do better for organization to achieve their goals.

            On the other hand, it’s maybe a time-consuming activity to consult much with the team on every matter that could be resulted in a reduction in productivity, so managers should keep a balance between these matters.

            JBS management team and managers are well aware of these cons and sometimes remain in or exhibit a bureaucratic state of mind to ensure that workforce must follow the procedures and rules or regulation and must not take the democratic or participative attitude of managers granted. This approach has made JBS maintain its high-quality standards in their products and services. But too much emphasis or exhibit of authoritative or bureaucratic management style reduces the creativity of the workforce that resulted in staff turnover, resentment and absenteeism and employees could board from their static way of work. (JBS)

References of Management Styles of JBS Australia

Bryman, Alan. Leadership and Organizations (RLE: Organizations). Routledge, 2013.

Cox, Sharon A. Managing Information in Organizations: A Practical Guide to Implementing an Information Management Strategy. Macmillan International Higher Education, 2014.

JBS. jbssa.com.au. n.d. 02 May 2019. <http://jbssa.com.au/Default.aspx>.

Purcell, J. "Mapping management styles in employee relations." Journal of Management Studies (1987): 533-548.