A Life Cycle Assessment or LCA suggests that one and
all in the entire sequence within the life cycle of a product has an obligation
as well as its own function, which taking into the description for the entire applicable
effects on the society, the environment and the economy as well. A Life
Cycle Assessment or LCA approach allows the
individuals, product inventors, service providers, and also the government
representatives to create the options intended for the longer term and with the
deliberation of the entire environmental platform (land, air, and water) (Guinée).
Margarida C. Coelho, and Diogo Almeida (2019) proposed that a Life Cycle Assessment
or LCA defines as a method to assess the factors of environment along with the
competent effects that linked with a product, service, or otherwise a process (Coelho and
Almeida).
This method operates by certain steps, which are:
Bring together a list of applicable energy and also substantial
involvements and the environmental reliefs
Appraising the competent effects of environmental that associated with
the recognized involvements and reliefs
Construing the outcomes to support the user to create a further
knowledgeable conclusion
Life Cycle Assessment or LCA methodology has a number of
particular elements, mentioned such as the system boundaries, goal definition
and scope. Furthermore, the outcomes from the Life Cycle Assessment or LCA are
every so often measured by the inadequate data inventory with unidentified
dependability. However, even with the several boundaries, Life Cycle Assessment
or LCA is extensively applied as a device in the process of decision-making within
the selection progress, scheme, and also optimization to pinpoint the clean
technologies finally.
The four main levels of performing a Life Cycle
Assessment or LCA can be seen in the picture below. Businesses, national
services, manufacturing administrations and the scientists can get the
advantage of studying on how to integrate the environmentally friendly
presentation which grounded on the life cycle idea into their progress of
decision-making.

Resource: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282317121_Cycling_Mobility_-_A_Life_Cycle_Assessment_Based_Approach
The
definition for each levels of a Life Cycle Assessment or LCA are:
Life Cycle Assessment or LCA purposes to measure of the
environmental effects of the condensed distance of further travelling styles
that are exchanged via the shared bicycle could adequately balance the life
cycle ecological loads related with the shared bicycle. Seeing the point that
exchanging the personal bicycle and cross-country with the shared bicycle do
not make any change for the environmentally friendly presentation, scheme limitations
of this study is that, it’s only cover for four kinds of transportations. The
Lime Company needs to view for a study that examines on the benefit of the
bicycle sharing for personal and also public segments. The progressions in the
considered system contain:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
(Zheng, Gu and Zhang). The picture below explains for the detail
further.

Resource: sustainability-11-01550.pdf
Within this revision, both of the principal, as well as
the secondary data, are engaged. Surveyed interactive modifications in the
definitions of travelling are oppressed as the principal data. In the other
hand, the secondary data present for the community datasets which comprise an extensive
variety of the current materials, the definition of travelling and also the
processes of energy ingestion as well. The environment demonstration of the system
within the bicycle sharing is dignified by the travelling method of alternative
travelling methods and the environment impacts of a comprehensive life cycle for
a shared bicycle.
As the latest of Life Cycle Assessment or LCA method, the
ReCiPe technique, which is the furthermost
modern and synchronized indicator method in life cycle impact assessment,
has been practiced on showing the travelling performances. The three end-result
of the ReCiPe indicators are designated as the
,
,
and also
.
These designated indicators measure the prospective environmental effects
rather than the authentic effects.
Another study from Ricardo Javier
Bonilla‐Alicea, Bryan C. Watson,
Ziheng Shen, Laura Tamayo, and Cassandra Telenko (2019) suggested on their
journal that, the Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS has included the latest
technology which transferred from the smart dock network into the smart bicycle
systems which also been used by The Lime Company. A study which using the Life Cycle Assessment or LCA has delivered the empirical Life Cycle Assessment
or LCA of a smart bike. In the production stage,
smart bikes produce roughly three times for the extent of
releases if compared
with the smart dock bikes per kilometer provoked throughout the lifetime, and
if seeing the endpoint classifications of the human healthiness, environment,
and assets, smart bikes consume roughly
for the
environmentally friendly effect. The outcomes propose that by switching from
smart dock to smart bike have need of intensification in ridership through an aspect
of
to overwhelm the enlarged of environmentally friendly effect
based on the GHG releases. The experiment discovers that smart docks have
turned out to be better at a people concentration among
(in a bike approachable town) and
(in a town that is fewer prospective to bike) (Bonilla‐Alicea, Watson and
Shen).
The vehicles which driven by the
electricity slightly than gasoline are certainly removing the transportation-linked
releases, in which
these e-scooter strategies that The Lime Company has offered and stated that
the voyages with using these electric scooters will able to lessen the releases
and create the integrally environmentally-friendly movement choices. If we take
a look at the releases of these
vehicles assembling
and reallocating the scooters, I assumed that the dockless electric scooter
strategies from The Lime Company could not be considered as the green option as
the company purpose. In fact, with the fact that there are lots of journeys
which taken with these scooters are exchanging the effectively carbon-neutral
selections, the scooters even might able to increase the total
passage of releases in a city (WANG).
According to Elliot Fishman (2016), in terms of the
socio-economic as well as the demographic features of the user, complete Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS appears to draw a specific sketch of user
which are described as; man, white, working and, matched to the normal populace
where the Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS are
applied, the younger, further wealthy, extra cultured and further to be
expected had previously involved in cycling individually of bike sharing (Fishman). Generally,
indication on the average of the user sketch proposes that bike sharing mainly
imitates inadequate forms of contribution related further in over-all with
cycling, gender, stages and cultural modifications in cycling performs set up
in countries with low cycling levels.
Moreover Fishman also said that, the station location is
also mentioned as an essential feature which supporting the general arrangement
productivity in the qualitative surveys of shareholders of Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS, and in the
furthermost bike sharing info bases, there is also an indication that some of
the current supreme schemes, have applied the practice of further recognized
systems to the position of stations in strategic places to make the most for
the use of Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS (Fishman).
In addition to this, Miriam Ricci (2015) proposed in her
journal that, the Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS
has been influenced and creates numbers of modifications for the broader travel
performance of users. In the other hand, along with the divergent consequences
within dissimilar contexts and also within the deference of dissimilar
transportation styles. With deference to cycling, Bicycle
Sharing Systems or BSS seems to grow the occurrence where a bicycle
(whether it is individual or shared) is used, consequently backing up to
support the cycling performance and also upsurge for the complete cycling
stages. Since the users of Bicycle Sharing
Systems or BSS do not usually use helmets or any other committed cycling
outfit, Bicycle Sharing Systems or BSS is
able to potentially standardize the appearance of cycling (Ricci).
References of the transportation system
Bonilla‐Alicea, Ricardo
Javier, et al. "Life cycle assessment to quantify the impact of technology
improvements in bike‐sharing systems." Journal of Industrial Ecology
(2019).
Coelho,
Margarida C. and Diogo Almeida. "Cycling mobility–a life cycle assessment
based approach." Transportation research procedia (2015): 443-451.
Fishman,
Elliot. "Bikeshare: A review of recent literature." Transport
Reviews (2016): 92-113.
Frank,
Lawrence D. and Peter O. Engelke. "The built environment and human
activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban form on public health." Journal
of planning literature (2001): 202-218.
Guinée,
Jeroen B. "Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO
standards." The international journal of life cycle assessment (2002):
311-313.
li.me. About
Us. n.d. <https://www.li.me/about-us>.
Ricci, Miriam.
"A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and
operation." Research in Transportation Business & Management
(2015): 28-38.
WANG,
RUI. "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS BY ALTERNATIVE URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS." (2011).
Zheng,
Fanying, et al. "Is Bicycle Sharing an Environmental Practice? Evidence
from a Life Cycle Assessment Based on Behavioral Surveys." Sustainability
(2019).