Evaluate the use of English language features within two given texts (The dangers of Demonology & The Independent)

        The fact that discussed in the text “The Dangers of Demonology” is about the demonology in the context of hatred in moneylending that has been occurred for centuries. The opinion that the author stated in this article is that the civilizations have relieved the prohibition of moneylending have been improved along with the dangerous prejudice. The author also claimed that this prejudice had been made destruction in the global economy, and also, in contradiction of financiers, the prejudice might able to trigger for non-economic destruction as well. At the end of the text, the argument appears about how the ethnic prejudice is considered to be widely free from such immoralities, but in the other hand, the demonization is able to transform into new shape easily.

            Meanwhile, the fact that discussed in the text "The Independent" is about a conflict in social care, especially in the context of medical progress and better health. The author's opinion about this fact is, the bill of social care is getting bigger progressively. The author also claimed that it is time to reform the system in social from today. The argument also appears in the text about how the tax should be bared for individuals.

            The elements of argument in “The dangers of Demonology” are around the danger of this prejudice, which is starts to beyond the limit, and also how this prejudice could generate the policies of prosperity-destroying. While in “The Independent,” the elements of the argument are around the savings or assets from individuals for their social care requirements and the contribution from the state.
Evaluate the use of English language features within two texts

            The use of English within the article “The dangers of Demonology” and “The Independent” could be seen that both articles are using more passive sentences rather than the active ones. The words that are used in both articles are also quite difficult to understand since, in my opinion, both articles are using dictionary words more than the easy words which make the readers getting difficult to understand (Nelson & Greenbaum, 2013).

Summary of one article

            “The dangers of Demonology” describes the hatred of bankers which considered to be the eldest and most hazardous prejudices in the world. This is due to the fact that this type of prejudice in moneylending claimed to make destruction for both economic and also non-economic areas. In the economic area, the economic leadership which delivered to Protestant Europe in the era when Luther and Calvin have made access for moneylending to appear. In the other hand, in non-economic area, this prejudice has been presented by the Jewish financier that was involved in an evil global conspiracy in the year of 1930. In addition to this, the civilizations have presented their action about the rise of this prejudice with releasing the ban of moneylending with a hope to prevent the appearance for this type of prejudice. The conclusion from this article is, it is difficult to remove this prejudice since demonization could transform into new shape easily.