Strategic
fit represents the extent to which a firm is capable of meeting its strengths
and resources with the opportunities available in the external environment. In
other words, it represents the matching of the internal and external
environment of a company. Internal environment includes all capabilities and
resources of the organization (Chan, Ngai, & Moon, 2016). While on the other
hand, the external environment of the organization is consist of available
opportunities and threats in the targeted segment. Matching between internal
resources and external opportunities is only possible by implementing an
attractive and appropriate strategy. The organization needs to have actual
capabilities and resources to support and execute an appropriate strategy (Ha & Tang, 2016). Thus we can say
that an organization should take into consideration its products and nature of
the product for the achievement of the strategic fit. Most of the time,
companies failed in the management of the supply chain because of the mismatch
between the nature of product demand and supply chain strategy. Each kind of
product requires a specific strategy for supply chain management only then the
organization can achieve a strategic fit (Chan, Ngai, & Moon, 2016).
The main
differences between both types are caused by a difference in nature, demand,
and life cycle (Ha & Tang, 2016). Functional products
are long-lasting products that can be found easily in grocery shops and local
petrol stations. Functional products remain unchanged for a longer period of
time and usually have stable and predictable demand. Organizations producing
and selling functional products can easily forecast market demand and manage
their supply chains efficiently. Somehow, functional products usually have high
competition in the market as stable growth attracts to other companies and
investors to invest in this industry (Chavez, Yu, Feng, & Wiengarten, 2014). As a result of the increase
in competition, organizations decrease their prices and earn relatively less
profit. The low-profit-margin caused by strong competition in the market is a
negative point for functional products. While on the other hand, primarily
innovative products usually get change over the period of time (Ross, 2016). Garment industry
products like fashion clothing and apparel fall in this category. In other
words, Garment industry products are primarily innovative products. Fashion get
changes over the period of time; therefore, the life cycle of garment industry
products is relatively limited and short (Ha & Tang, 2016). The key benefit of
producing and selling the innovative product is a monopoly over market and high
prices. Garment industry can sell out their products at a high price when they
come up with innovative and new designs. Somehow, organizations can also enhance
profitability by minimizing the cost of management in the supply chain. Cost-efficient
supply chain management can support the garment industry to achieve a strategic
fit in the targeted market (Chavez, Yu, Feng, & Wiengarten, 2014).
Garment industry can achieve a strategic fit between its
supply chain strategy and its competitive strategy by matching its internal
resources and capabilities with the opportunities available external targeted
market. Garment industry may get its strategic fit by building a competitive
strategy to select some most responsive and suitable customer segments (Paulraj, Chen, & Blome, 2017). These segment can
be demographic or geographic segment as both are important in the garment
industry. Moreover, the Garment industry especially needs to understand what
kind of customer needs and requirements can be satisfied with their products. In
fact, the key focus should be on the customer's need (Chan, Ngai, & Moon, 2016).
Garment
industry sometimes introduces a quite new design or product in the market that
was obviously never demanded or needed by the customers. In such a situation,
the best strategy is to create a need by spreading awareness and promoting the
new product in the targeted segment. Company working in the garment industry
can only earn success in the market by addressing the competition (Ross, 2016). They need to have
an understanding and complete information about competitors and competitive
strategies. Mainly the company working in the garment industry have to ensure a
competitive advantage for the achievement of strategic fit. Innovation itself
support a competitive advantage if it relates to the requirements and needs of
customers. Somehow, for innovative products, we cannot predict the future
demands of the products by the selected audience (Gunasekaran, et al., 2016).
Garment
industry should pay attention to the supply chain management strategies in the
market for the achievement of strategic fit (Paulraj, Chen, & Blome, 2017). The company should
focus on its resources (human resources, financial resources, and raw
materials) while developing strategies for the supply chain. In case of limited
resources organization cannot add extra intermediaries in the supply chain. Moreover,
in the case of market demand is increasing then organization need to ensure the
availability of more resources for the execution of operations and meeting
market demands (Johnsen, Howard, & Miemczyk, 2014).
Considering
low margin and unpredictable demand factor, we need to efficient supply chain
strategy with a focus on cost minimization. In other words, a company working
in the garment industry with the primarily innovative product should strengthen
its resources and ensures strength by minimizing cost and enlarging profit
margin (Chan, Ngai, & Moon, 2016). Innovativeness,
uniqueness, and quality can add value to the product and may enhance the
capabilities of the organization to address the competitive situation in the
external market. Thus effective strategy having the capability to match
internal strengths and external market opportunities can assist the achievement
of strategic fit (Chavez, Yu, Feng, & Wiengarten, 2014).
However,
there are some obstacles that need to be tackled in the process of achieving
the strategic fit for the garment industry. Key obstacles for garment industry
are increasing the variety of products in the market, decreasing product life
cycles, globalization, increasing demanding customers, and unpredictable market
demand. The company can tackle these obstacles by developing an appropriate
strategy (Ross, 2016). For instance, obstacles related to
globalization and increasing variety of products can be tackled by adding value
in the product and promoting capabilities of the firm. Increase in
globalization results in the increase of competition and the availability of
alternative products (Ha & Tang, 2016). In such a condition,
the garment industry needs to pay more attention to its innovativeness,
quality, and pricing. Moreover, making products capable of meeting customer
needs and requirements can also support in securing a better position in the
competitive market while obstacles related to demand factors can be tackled
through formulating an efficient strategy for getting relatively accurate
information about demand and market changes. The company can use historical
data for getting information about demand (Ross, 2016).
Obstacle related
to decreasing product life cycle is really crucial for the survival of the garment
industry. Fashion get changes over the period of time (Chan, Ngai, & Moon, 2016). A product comes in
the market, goes to peek (maturity level) and declines rapidly in response to
the introduction of new product in the market. In such a situation, garment
companies can do only one thing that is to increase their product variety. The
company need to work continuously on the production sector. To address this
volatility company need to make sure the availability of products while keeping
product obsolescence low (Gunasekaran, et al., 2016). A clear
understanding of the demand can make bring ease for organizations. Innovative
products usually have uncertain demand. Fisher and Reman developed an accurate
method to predict the life cycle of demand. According to the findings, the average
forecast error is 55% if we collect data from a team of expert merchants. Nevertheless,
the use of early two weeks sales data can reduce error by 8% for the prediction
and forecasting of future demand. Strong agreement on a forecast by the
committee can also cause to decrease forecast error. Thus organizations working
with innovative products like the garment industry can reduce forecast error
easily (Gunasekaran, et al., 2016).
References
of Strategic Fit of Garment Industry of Supply chain management
Chan, A. T., Ngai, E. W., & Moon, K. K. (2016).
The Effects of Strategic and Manufacturing Flexibilities and Supply Chain
Agility on Firm. European Journal of Operational Research, 1-35. doi::
10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.006
Chavez, R., Yu, W., Feng, M., & Wiengarten, F.
(2014). The Effect of Customer-Centric Green Supply Chain Management on
Operational Performance and Customer Satisfaction. 25(3), 205–220.
Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba,
S. F., Childe, S. J., & Akter, S. (2016). Big Data and Predictive
Analytics for Supply Chain and Organizational Performance. Journal of
Business Research, 70, 308-317.
Ha, A. Y., & Tang, C. S. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook
of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management. Springer.
Johnsen, T. E., Howard, M., & Miemczyk, J.
(2014). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: A Sustainability
Perspective (illustrated ed.). Routledge.
Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J., & Blome, C. (2017).
Motives and Performance Outcomes of Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Practices: A Multi-theoretical Perspective. 145(2), 239–258.
Ross, D. F. (2016). Introduction to Supply Chain
Management Technologies (2 ed.). CRC Press.