Ethics In Research of The growth of markets internationally

        Once trust had been established with the participant, then the interview was carried out. And uncertainty about the procedure was studied during the session of feedback and solved between the participant and researcher in a mutual way. It was deemed necessary to keep all the personal information of participants private (Simons, 2012).

Data of interviews were stored in a manual way while after the research, notes were eliminated. This data was not utilized in the absence of participants' permission. Meanwhile, information security was guaranteed and it was published in an anonymous way (McNiff& Whitehead, 2011).

All participants did not obtain any kind of financial help.

BIAS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH

        In this study, a significant and first bias could be the membership of researcher in terms of OMI and a supposed preference for this firm. PMI standard’s credibility is indicated by its utilization in the whole world, which is evaluated by the sheer number of certifications and membership of PMI. It seems to comply with the universal norms present in various nations in different languages. The strengthened relationship of researcher with the company influenced this study in a positive way on the basis of familiarity of the structure which is standard. The structure of the interview was simply based on the standard of PMI. All the important present standards for PM globally and their processes were evaluated for ensuring a common analysis and understanding of the PM.

        In PM, the experience of the author could impact the interpretation of all the results as it involved the management of projects. An extensive review of literature minimized this limitation in complication and PM; the statements and opinions of researchers are defined clearly.

        Secondly, there is a chance that the study can be biased as it is carried out in (Saudi Arabia) a limited area with only one chosen standard of PM as the foundation. This could affect the generalizability of the research findings. However, the chosen standard was seemingly compared in all of its processes with other standards accepted globally. From the same basis, those standards are obtained and they differ in details only. That is why reverse engineering to different standards must be provided. 

        The study was bound to only Saudi Arabia which makes it possible for the results to be influenced by values and culture. In Western or Asian cultures, the interpretation of discussion, reflection, and questions may lead to a slight change in findings. However, the chosen standard is used globally. Therefore, it is a cross-cultural parameter which respects cultural differences. In addition, globalization leads to the unification of important problems in PM. This limitation to the standard and the concentration on a localized region was quite important for the proposal of effective and sufficient handling of complexity.