PHASE 5 – ADJOURNING “PROJECT SUCCESSFULLY ENDED”

There is no real definition for the 5th phase of this model. This was described by him as follow:

        “22 studies were reviewed by us that had made an appearance since the model’s original publication and which we found using Social Citation Index. Tuckman hypothesis, dubbed by an article, supported the presence 4 stages while suggesting the 5th stage and a perfect rhyme cannot be found by it. Adjourning was the term used for it” (Tuckman, 1984)

        In 1977, Tuckman supplemented the 5th phase. It explains that members of the team will move forward to a different approach with the completion of the original task. 

For the guide regarding complication, adjourning phase is not needed. Hopefully, the project met its end effectively.

        Overall, project managers are supported by this guide for dealing with different complicated projects from the start. Additionally, studies indicate the management of projects which are complicated in different cycles while providing support for management of the project by offering an assessment, methods, and tools. In the process, the project manager's reflection is significant and the first step in detecting a complication. From the present study, this element is missing. In addition, the storming phase is not present; knowledge is acquired by the project manager regarding where to begin in the specific complicated project. The PMI standard is utilized by the link as a foundation as it is approved cross-culturally. Outcomes of interviews are disposed by it with experts of PM in Saudi Arabia and is also a generalized model. It seems to indicate where the enablers of complicate can arise in different complex projects and how processes can be affected by them in the PM which is sensitive to the complication.

Other than the existing standards of project management, this guide must allow the managers of the project to professionally handle all complicated projects.