1. Introduction of Euroland foods
The company Euroland foods, in Brussels the company
headquartered situated, Belgium, Euroland Food Company famous in producing
high-quality products such as yogurt, ice-cream, fruit juice as well as bottled
water. Throughout Britain, Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Belgium, northern
France, western Germany as well as Luxembourg Euroland Foods company product were sold. By Theo Verdin the Company was
founded, a farmer Belgian, as his dairy business consequences. To product
development through his keen attention as well as marketing intelligent, over the years the business grew
steadily. In 1979 the company went public, for trading on the London,
Frankfurt, as well as Brussels exchanges was listed by 1993. EUR 1.6 billion
the Euroland food had this sale in 2001. For the 60 percent of the company’s
revenue ice cream accounted; in 1982 yogurt was introduced as well as
contributed 20%. Among fruit juice as well as bottled water the remaining 20%
of sales equally divided. “Rolly” was the Euroland Food’s flagship brand name,
in farmer’s clothing by a fat dancing bear that was
represented.
The leading product of the company
is ice-cream and also for the customer it’s a loyal base on its high-butterfat
content who sought, large chocolate
chunks, nuts, fruit, as well as original flavors wide range. Since 1998 the
Company Euroland foods sales had been static, in northern Europe to low productivity growth which management attributed
as well as in some areas market saturation. Moreover, outsides Observers, in
new-product introductions faulted recent failures. To expand the company market
presence as well as to boost sales introduce the newer product the members of
management wanted this. Increase in the market analysis, as well as sales,
enhanced the market value of the company managers
of the Euroland Foods Company hoped that. Just below the book value at 14 times
earnings is currently the Company’s stock. As compared
to other companies this price ratio is
below the trading multiples, as well as because of this, it gave the smaller value to the brand of the company.
For the past two decades in Europe in the dairy as well as
water market the Euroland food company has been a prominent player. Moreover,
the company is struggling to grow because of the market shifts as well as new
competition. For the Company in serious debt at
increasing the market share a recent attempt at increasing, even worse.
For the 2001 financial year, with shareholders becoming anxious as well as on
spending a limit, in implementing new expansion strategies the company must be
creative that will impact both open new markets as well as existing markets as
well. In the Company for market expansion,
this report looks to examine and clarify the current option as this is depicted in the various board members of the
project. IRR and a payback frame; this is
the requirement of all the projects; this
is the current evaluation system as the plan is rejected
if project goals are not meet. Two traditional hurdles were found in the first data analysis (Banerjee, 2012).
2. Background
of the firm of Euroland foods
Euroland Foods S.A. Belgium Headquartered. It is one of the
leading European manufacturers of fruit
juice, bottled water, yogurt, and
ice-creams. All over in Scandinavia, Netherlands, Britain, Belgium, etc. its
product was sold. In 1924 Theo Verdin established the company, a farmer of
Belgian as an offshoot of his business of dairy. About hi keen focus on the marketing of shrewd and development of the product, over the years the market grew steadily. In 1979 the company went in public and 1993 it was listed for trading in London. Brussels and
Frankfurt’s exchange. About almost 1.6 billion EUR had sales by Euroland in
2000. Sixty percent of ice cream accounted for the revenue of the company. In
1982 yogurt was launched shared about 20 percent. The remaining 20 percent of sales were separated equally among bottled water and fruit juices.
“Rolly” was the brand Euroland food, demonstrated by a fat dancing bear in
farmer clothing. The ice cream was
leading product of this company, had a loyal
based customer who so finds out its high content of butterfat, large chocolate
chunk, nut, fruit and a colossal number of original flavors. In the Board of Directors, the capital budget was explained.
Consideration was up to the total to EUR 316
million for eleven significant projects.
Still, at EUR 120 million the range was set. The senior management of Euroland
Foods S.A. was to assign funds was a challenge for them between a limit of
project compelling. (kthosani, 2012)
Control of Euroland suggested that the solution to
their upcoming financial upcoming issues was to cover up the projects in that
they thought will develop the most value all over for the firm. In 2001 the
board directors voted that EUR120 Million should be in a range of capital
spending on all over the projects. The management of committee commonly
implement the plans. By one of seven
senior managers for thoughtful analysis, each
professional project must be promoted
first. Further, a period of explanation
concluded and voting which type of projects are the best fitting in the firm and automatically which category of the budget of capital should be selected. Ranks of
management lie on two kinds of test
financial, the Internal Rate of Return and the Payback Period.
Some of the restrictions of developing Method of payback it is easy to get clear about it. There are some drawbacks that it ignores the value of money and lie for long time projects.
As well as, it is better that Euroland uses the methodology to calculate with a
method that is accurately investigating
money’s value according to time (IRR). One benefit of using IRR is that it is
friendly understandable because the higher level of percentage indicates the
more effective proposal. We study each recommendation
in the situation and analysis from which
project we can avail more returns. Usually,
NPV and IRR are strictly the same so here investigating both by Euroland
does not make any sense. Analyzing the IRR,
there are few drawbacks are that we can
cause different IRR’s in the project. IRR does not differentiate among
borrowing and investing.
3. Statement
of situation of Euroland foods
The Company Euroland Foods has the two main problems that are
compared by peers. The debt-to-equity ratio is one of the thigh
problems, and the other one is a low price to the earnings ratio. Whereas the
debt-to-equity ratio is approximately 125% that is cre4ated through the Banque
du Bruges, as well as a bank of Euroland
also, could keep silence. Then the Banque du Bruges has actively pushed the debt reduction Euroland program. In this
case study of the Euroland, there is no projected that can be financed, if leverage level beyond the
current for the debt-to-equity is low. Price to earnings ratio is meager, where the stock price is also inadequate. During the case study of Euroland,
the stock price is small than the average of the peers. The current
ratio of the Euroland is approximately 14, where the market value of the
Euroland is meager from its book value.
For the introduction of the new product, the Euroland company failed. In 1998
the sale of the Euroland Company had been
stopped. The Banque du Bruges as well as Creditor worrying about the ability to
pay the debt back of the Euroland Company. Venus Asset management is one of the
most significant stockholders is concerning
regarding the cutting off of the dividends (lopez, 2013)
To develop the capital of firms’ budget reached by
Euroland Food’s senior manager for the way year, there is an evaluation of totaled €316M eleven projects, By
chance, the director of the board had
implemented investing the range of capital of plan
of the only €120M. Euroland food structured
the 11 programs, so it should be analyzed that which project has the most significant profit margin for the company.
Constraints on Euroland foods
The
matter of policy, as well as investment of the proposals at the Euroland S.A, is subjected for the two tests of financial for the IRR along with the
payback;
Type
of project
|
Minimum
IRR acceptable
|
Maximum
acceptable Payback
|
Markets /New products
|
12%
|
6 years
|
Market extension/ product
|
10%
|
5 years
|
Improvement of efficiency
|
8%
|
Four
years
|
Environmental safety
|
-
|
-
|
In 1998 the revenue of the Euroland Food S.A was remained constants, by the attribute of management
in the low population growth for the northern European as well as the
saturation of market in various areas. The Stakeholder believed, for the
slackening of the increase is due to the
faulted; in the recent failures. Numerous
of the board of members expand the Euroland Food S.A market presence as well as
to introduced the great products plus to boosted the sales. There are several constraints for the Euroland Food S.A for the
board of members to expands their business. But for the budget restricts the Euroland Food S.A can go ahead by
the few projects. Committee of the senior manager in the Euroland prepared the
capital budget as well as a present for
the approval of the board members. There are five managing directors in this committee,
like the Finance director, president general director. Because of the high level of debt to equality, the board
director suggested limiting the capital
spending to EUR 120 million. On the table,
there were 11 projects and approximately a total
of EUR 316 million.
4. Organizational
Strengths of Euroland foods
The Euroland Company was the multinational producer for the high-quality yogurt, ice cream, fruit juices,
as well as bottled water. In different parts of Europe, England, Germany, Sweden,
Denmark, and Belgium they had the various ten
plants.
Euroland Foods Company has the following strengths in an organization. Powers are the capabilities of any
Company as well as resources it could use to develop, sustain the competitive
advantage as well as design in the marketplace. As we talked about the Euroland
foods company depicted the presence of broad
geographic. In delivering efficient services to the customer’s project 2001 has
extensive network dealer as well as network associates that help on this but in
Finance and accounting industry competitive challenges help in managing. The
other strength of Euroland Foods Company
is the position of market leadership. This company has a strong leadership position in the market as
their leading product is ice-cream and it’s very famous among their customer.
And this thing builds the believed on the customer mind so their other product
also easily buys as it's successful when producing the new product in the market (James & Bess, 2012).
Reliable
recognition of brands is another strength
of the Euroland Foods Company in the industry of Finance and accounting
industry project 2001 products have a keen
appreciation of the brand. To charge a premium, this has enabled the company in budgeting; financial analysis study compares to its
competitors. Outside the Finance and accounting sector over the years Euroland
Foods S.A various business has ventured. To develop diversified revenue, this has enabled company stream beyond
the segment of Finance & Accounting as well as Finance & accounting
sector. In the Finance & accounting strive to innovative even though the
most players, 2001 project at customer-driven
innovation has an unbeaten record. Within
budgeting, financial analysis segment this is the different customer segments
brand catering. In the finance &
accounting segment to penetrate different customer segments, the projects 2001 have helped the company by offering an extensive product. To diversify revenue streams, it has also supported the organization (F, S, & Opitz, 2018).
5. Possible
solutions of Euroland foods
The Euroland Company, choose the different project to increase the sales, and these projects are selected
under the EUR of the approximately 1230 million limitations
of budget, restriction of minimum IRR, as
well as the restriction of the maximum
payback. The Euroland Company used total present value, payback period, and the
internal rate of the return analyze for every project.
EUROLAND FOODS S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
|
Expansion
of truck fleet
|
Installation
of new plant
|
Expansion
of the current plant
|
Moving into
snack foods
|
Introducing
Automation
|
Expansion
in south
|
Expansion
in East
|
Moving into
Sweetener
|
Control of
Inventory
|
Acquisition
strategically
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Plant
|
$ 30.00
|
$ 37.50
|
$ 15.00
|
$ 22.50
|
$ 21.00
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 22.50
|
$ 22.50
|
$ 45.00
|
|
Net
Working Capital
|
$ 3.00
|
$ 7.50
|
$ -
|
$ 4.50
|
$ -
|
$ 30.00
|
$ 30.00
|
$ 4.50
|
$ -
|
$ 15.00
|
|
|
Years
|
EXPECTED
FREE CASH FLOWS
|
|
0
|
$ (17.10)
|
$ (45.00)
|
$ (15.00)
|
$ (9.00)
|
$ (21.00)
|
$ (30.00)
|
$ (30.00)
|
$ (27.00)
|
$ (18.00)
|
$ (25.00)
|
|
1
|
$ (11.85)
|
$ 3.00
|
$ 1.88
|
$ (9.00)
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 5.25
|
$ 4.50
|
$ 4.50
|
$ 8.25
|
$ (30.00)
|
|
2
|
$ 4.50
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 2.25
|
$ (9.00)
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 6.00
|
$ 5.25
|
$ 6.00
|
$ 8.25
|
$ 7.50
|
|
3
|
$ 5.25
|
$ 8.25
|
$ 2.63
|
$ 4.50
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 6.75
|
$ 6.00
|
$ 6.75
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 13.50
|
|
4
|
$ 6.00
|
$ 9.00
|
$ 3.00
|
$ 4.50
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 6.75
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 16.50
|
|
5
|
$ 6.75
|
$ 9.38
|
$ 3.38
|
$ 6.00
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 8.25
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 19.50
|
|
6
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 9.75
|
$ 3.75
|
$ 6.75
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 9.00
|
$ 8.25
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 22.50
|
|
7
|
$ 10.50
|
$ 10.13
|
$ 2.25
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 4.13
|
$ 9.75
|
$ 9.00
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 25.50
|
|
8
|
|
$ 7.50
|
$ 2.25
|
$ 8.25
|
|
$ 10.50
|
$ 9.75
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 28.50
|
|
9
|
|
$ 7.88
|
$ 2.25
|
$ 9.00
|
|
$ 11.25
|
$ 10.50
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 31.50
|
|
10
|
|
$ 8.25
|
$ 2.25
|
$ 9.75
|
|
$ 12.00
|
$ 11.25
|
$ 7.50
|
|
$ 88.50
|
Total
- Not Discounted
|
$ 11.55
|
$ 35.63
|
$ 10.88
|
$ 29.25
|
$ 7.88
|
$ 56.25
|
$ 48.75
|
$ 42.75
|
$ 6.00
|
$ 198.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payback
|
|
6.14
|
6.19
|
6.50
|
7.30
|
6.91
|
5.45
|
5.00
|
5.70
|
3.80
|
5.10
|
Max
Accepted Payback
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal
Rate of Return
|
7.83%
|
11.31%
|
11.23%
|
13.44%
|
8.66%
|
21.39%
|
18.77%
|
20.47%
|
16.17%
|
27.47%
|
|
Minimum
Accepted ROR
|
8%
|
10%
|
10%
|
12%
|
8%
|
12%
|
12%
|
12%
|
8%
|
12%
|
|
Difference
|
-0.17%
|
1.31%
|
1.23%
|
1.44%
|
0.66%
|
9.39%
|
6.77%
|
8.47%
|
8.17%
|
15.47%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV
@ WACC 10.6%
|
-2.88
|
1.49
|
0.41
|
3.74
|
-1.31
|
17.99
|
13.49
|
13.43
|
1.75
|
69.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV
@ min ROR
|
-0.19
|
2.81
|
0.82
|
1.79
|
0.48
|
14.85
|
10.62
|
10.97
|
2.67
|
59.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity
|
-0.04
|
0.46
|
0.13
|
0.32
|
0.09
|
2.63
|
1.88
|
1.94
|
1.03
|
10.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For project 1, in Exhibit 3 the expansion as well as replacem41ent
of the truck fleet, and in for project the New plant, for project 3, plant expansions,
for project 4 Snack foods rollout, as
well as development, and the last project 5 automation of plant as well as the
conveyor systems is eliminated, on the behalf
of maximum payback period.
All the remaining projects are considerable. In this case
study of Euroland Company, the individual
plans are the effluent of the treatment
of water at four plants. The category of water treatments for environments as well as
safety belongs because there are no measurements
presents. The Euroland Company see the future expenditure as well as if the
Leyden was right. Then it spends approximately 16 million EUR today and 15
million EUR for four years later. For the
Euroland, these
projects will save a lot in the future.
These types of project are also going to be mandatory
for the late four years.
6. Recommended
solution
By the analysis of the case study of the Euroland Company, I have approved the project 11, if I was on the board
directors. Leading acquisitions for the Schnapps brand as well as the connected
facilities is analyzed for the project 10
in Exhibit 3. For project 7 in Exhibit, the market
expansion of the southward is examined plan six
that is also present in exhibit 3. The
introduction, as well as development for the project 9, is the new artificially
ice cream, sweetened yogurt this is analyzed as project
8 in Exhibit 3. For the three projects,
the capital budget is approximately 60 million
EUR, 30 million EUR and the EUR 27 million correspondingly, that gives the
total 117 million. Almost EUR 3million we
have still for use, as well as I would propose the method of the treatment of the effluent water in the four pants of projects,
Multiple types of assumption and techniques analysis that can
be implemented for the correction of several factors, affecting every project separately. e.g.
·
The
value of money by time can be accounted through the methodology of discounting such as IRR or NPV.
·
Evaluating
the NPV t infinity can account for not equal to the lifetimes of the projects.
·
By
increasing the rate of hurdle level of risk can be
minimized.
Their huge
factors invalidate the important project’s
NPV investigation. They include:
·
Risk
·
Political
considerations
·
Issues
of regulatory consist of health, environmental and safety
·
Incompatibility
with the corporate strategy
·
Availability
of Resource
·
corporate
image or Impact on brand
·
Certainty
and Quality of the data used for investigating the several projects
·
Synergies
among the projects