To explain how to ensure the quality in observation research, and also to discuss the quality criteria

        A very common mistake can often made if the observer will prioritize to use the quantitative research data for judging qualitative work. The language of positivistic type of research is not appropriate for qualitative type of work.

        Second mistake made by the observer is thinking that quality criteria do not have any influence to be used in qualitative research. There must be assurance that the work done by the observer is rigorous.

Quality criteria:

        First quality criteria mentioned is objectivity of the observer. Objectives must not be biased and there must be increase in awareness regarding any kind of injustice. Observer must be fair enough to its objectives mentioned and there must be a hard word regarding these objectives.

        Data used for research must be valid enough that it cannot be denied however it is taken on basis of observations. The main subjective of this is  trust worthiness.

There must be a hard work for conduction of this research in a systemized way to that results should be more accurate and should not be falsify.

Triangulation with methods, analysts and data sources, making the ways more visible in which there is more benefits.

        In similar manners, the criteria of the research in Dhofar bank observation are completely free from any biases. The entire aim is to practice the observational research by observing and analysing the behaviour of the staff working at Dhoffar Bank. Subsequently, the data is aimed to be used in a way to make it more beneficial.