The
aim of this article is to determine the factors which might act as barriers and
facilitators to the self-management, explained by adults suffering from a
chronic illness. This identification will be carried out using a qualitative
metasynthesis. Self-management is actually the active management people in
terms of a chronic illness with the help of their clinicians and family
members. The design used for this article is a qualitative metasynthesis and
fifty-three studies were analyzed by the authors on the factors that were able
to affect self-management in a chronic illness just as reported by adults with
age more than eighteen years. In order to review the qualitative metasynthesis,
Barroso and Sandelowsi approach was adopted. Overall, 16 chronic illnesses were
considered by the authors and 5 categories of factors were affecting the
self-management. The article plays an important role in informing interventions
which are customized for meeting the needs of individuals and improving health
results.
Design of A Metasynthesis of Factors
Affecting Self-Management of Chronic Illness
It can be said that qualitative
metasynthesis is an incorporation of findings obtained from the qualitative
studies with the goal to produce interpretive translations, generalizations, grand
narratives, and theories. This is the approach that has been used in this
article and for completing this metasynthesis, methodological procedures were
followed by the authors which were outlined by Borroso and Sandelowski: first
is literature search, second one is quality appraisal, third one is analysis,
and fourth one is the synthesis of findings. I believe that this approach is
quite effective because a proper outline for the metasynthesis approach is
being used. There is a linear direct that is provided by Borroso and
Sandelowski which is followed by authors that is time-efficient and ensures
success.
Search Methods of A Metasynthesis of Factors
Affecting Self-Management of Chronic Illness
Authors started with a thorough
literature study for identifying every article that utilized a qualitative
method for describing the factors which were influencing self-management from
the point of view adults suffering from a chronic illness. The authors took the
help of a medical librarian and for search for articles in different medical
databases for finding the most precise articles. I think that this decision was
accurate as they chose to depend on a proper expert rather than trying to find
the articles on their own. Different terms and often combinations were used for
searching the articles. Self-care as a keyword was not used by the authors
because it commonly refers to healthy behaviors. Studies were also included
with data from healthcare providers, family caregivers, or children. The
articles focusing on psychological illnesses were excluded since
self-management experience might be different within such populations. Additionally,
secondary analysis, dissertations, works on the basis of theory, literature
reviews, and metasynthesis of interventions of self-management were excluded.
In order to summarize and classify
the studies, information was recorded from each and every article on the design
of study, factors, and sample characteristics that were impacting or influencing
self-management. Eligible articles were actually distributed among the suitable
authors as it not only proved to be more effective but also in achieving the
needed information as soon as possible (Galvan & Galvan, 2017).
Psychosocial factors of A Metasynthesis of Factors
Affecting Self-Management of Chronic Illness
Authors
identified the factors affecting the self-management and classified them under
different classes. Psychosocial factors are classified under the main category
of Resources. Overall, this class includes equipment and psychosocial
subclasses. Authors cites psychosocial support as a factor that seemed to
impact the efforts of self-management in both negative and positive ways. It
was reported by individuals that positive support from peers or partners was very
important and influential. Friends and family, especially the ones nearby
assisted a lot with several aspects of self-management which includes reminder
about medication, accompanying the patients to checkups, and preparing the food
which is healthy. However, it was also reported by these individuals that the
negative support or lack of support from the peers and partners is actually a
barrier to self-management. For instance, the absence of support for a complete
new diet was determined as a barrier to the following recommendations of
treatment. The part of peer support and support groups has been highlighted by
many adults as a very significant facilitator to the self-management. Particularly,
peers and support groups with same conditions seemed to offer an opportunity
for sharing the information and feel a connection to the community. At last,
isolation was explained as an obstacle to the self-management (Ryan, et al., 2007).
How this article draws attention to
these psychosocial factors?
The
objective of this article has been all about determining the factors which are
important and influence self-management of adults suffering chronic illnesses. Other
than just identifying the factors, authors have also classified them and
explained them with examples. Psychosocial factors concern the emotional
support that patients get from their peers and fellows. It has always been
important to note that patients with almost any type of disease are able to
recover quicker when they are obtaining positive feedback and support from
those around him and taking care of him. The classic example is a mother caring
for her child and even if that child cannot get up under normal circumstances,
he would be able to stay conscious if the mother is being tender with him. The
weight that his mother cares for him will be sufficient for giving support to
the child.
Individuals with chronic diseases
seem to lose their willpower to fight the illness and it causes them to succumb
to whatever the fate has in for them. Therefore, when they are getting positive
support from others around him, he is able to show recovery and this article
sheds light to such psychosocial factors which can play an integral part in
improving the self-management of adults suffering from chronic illnesses. Families
can take the advantage of these psychosocial factors and rely on them when they
are caring for the patients. It can help them show positive support which might
be able to help the patient recover faster than what is predicted. There are
little activities that can have a significant impact on the patient and these
activities are identified by psychosocial factors (Barkway, 2013).
Interdisciplinary approach
of A Metasynthesis of
Factors Affecting Self-Management of Chronic Illness
This
article is focusing on the identification of factors which affect self-management
of adults who are suffering from chronic illnesses. What makes the
interdisciplinary approach of this article effective is that it has identified the
influencing factors of not a single category but various categories and
sub-categories. It helps all the researchers and healthcare experts that don’t
want to study all the factors but just a specific class or sub-class. That is
the most important reason why this article adopts an interdisciplinary
approach.
Conclusion on Metasynthesis of Factors Affecting
Self-Management of Chronic Illness
This
article would help me in identifying factors from a specific class so that I don’t
have to face a difficulty in finding them using different sources. Furthermore,
examples have been given which make it easier for me to understand just how the
factors can be implemented in clinical practice. There are people suffering
from chronic illnesses and any solution can prove to be beneficial and this
articles contributes a lot in helping individuals and healthcare experts in
realizing just how they can help or boost the recovery of patients. It can also
determine the obstacles to the self-management of adults suffering from chronic
illnesses (Schulman‐Green,
et al., 2016).
References of A Metasynthesis of
Factors Affecting Self-Management of Chronic Illness
Barkway, P., 2013. Psychology for health
professionals. s.l.:Elsevier Health Sciences.
Galvan, J. L. & Galvan, M. C., 2017. Writing literature reviews: A
guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. s.l.:Routledge.
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. & Cronin, P., 2007. Step-by-step guide to
critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British Journal of
Nursing, Volume 16, pp. 738-744.
Schulman‐Green, D., Jaser, S. S., Park, C. & Whittemore, R., 2016. A
metasynthesis of factors affecting self‐management of chronic illness. Journal
of advanced nursing, 72(7), pp. 1469-1489.