Introduction of Compare and contrast paper for Universalist approach and contingency approach for SHRM

        In the current time periods the concepts of the SHRM has been studied through the academics.  The strategic human resource management is the most important part of the planning’s of the manpower. It is also known as work and efforts of the significant management experts; which are encouraging to the importance of the people management with the effective and efficient sources for getting the competitive advantage. To developing the frame works it’s also encourage academic, the HR functions and its strategic role are involved in attaching the all function term of the prefix strategic with human resource management.

        It shows the long term functionality of the human resource management. In 1984 there were few one experts of the management who had introduced the concept of human resource management and they are named as Devaana, Fomburn and Tichy.  Strategic which is fit between the corporate strategy and hu8mna resource can be emphasized by these researches (Schuler, 2014).

            The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare the two major theory of the management and leadership skills, functions, and also evaluate their relevant strengths and weaknesses for an organization. This essay will be critically analyzed the basic pints of the Universalist Approach theory and its needs in the management society for any organization. It will explained about how the   Universalist Approach used in HRM and whit it proposes about the strategies of the HRM. It will also discuss its good pints along with its limitations and its evolution for the particular situation.

            This essay will be critically analyzed the basic pints of the contingency Approach and its needs in the management society for any organization. It will explained about how the   contingency Approach used in HRM and whit it proposes about the strategies of the HRM. It will also discuss its good pints along with its limitations and its evolution for the particular situation.

            This essay will critically analyzed and evaluate the related merits and materials of the contingency and Universalist Approach which is useful for the strategic human resource managements. The essay is starts up by providing the overview of the SHRM along with the explanation of the Universalist Approach and later own. After explain the Universalist Approach this paper will proposes the explanation of the contingency Approach along with its limitation and features. After the critically analyzing the both of these approaches neither can be sufficient for all situations of the HR strategies.  It can be the form human resource managements for making the effective strategy in the organization.