Conclusion on Compare and contrast paper for Universalist approach and contingency approach for SHRM

        It is concluded that Human resource management is playing the role of the bridge among the employees and management. The strategic human resource management leads towards the planning’s of the manpower. To developing the frame works it’s also encourage academic, the HR functions and its strategic role are involved in attaching the all function term of the prefix strategic with human resource management. It has been concluded that there are major approaches which can played the vital roles for the strategic human resource management but only two of them are discussed in this essay as Universalist Approach and contingency theory.

        Both of these are considered as the key for the strategic human resource management. It has been concluded that the Universalist Approach is the best key and more appropriate for the organization to training its objectives for enhancing the productivity of the employees because it lades towards the creation of the new strategies for handling the task of the organization in effective manners. This is also used to sustaining the competitive advantages because there is the strong connection among the Universalist Approach and HR practices and it can leads to mangers for the creation of the new strategies.