High return on
investment is the prime focus of investors. Investors analyse risk factor prior
to making investment in any financial institute like bank or any business
organization. High risk factor reduces the potential of expected rate of
return. Market risk, credit risk, and other risk factors also influence rate of
return offered by the Banks of Oman in form of interest or profit on the
deposit or investment of a specified amount. In the present work, risk and
return of Bank Muscat is analysed in detail. Present work also covers
calculations of average return and standard deviation of investment in Bank
Muscat.
Risk and Return of Bank
Muscat Investment Banking
The risk in
investment banking can be defined as the likelihood or probability of losses’
occurrence that is related to the expected financial return on any kind of
investment. In other words, the risk is known as a measure of uncertainty level
of achieving the financial return on as per investors’ expectations. Some of
the major types of risk include default or credit risk, country risk, interest
rate risk, market risk, or political risk. On the other hand, the return is
defined as a measure of loss or gain generated through an investment that is
related to the invested amount of money. The return usually is expressed a percentage
and useful for making personal financial decisions (Bhattacharya, 2011).
There exists a
trade-off between risk and return which means that an increase in risk will
inversely impact the return and higher risk is related to the higher probability
of greater returns and vice versa. This trade-off is faced by investors while
considering decisions regarding investment. For example, an investor of Bank
Muscat faces a trade-off between risk and return while making an investment
decision. If the investor deposits whole amount in saving bank account of Bank
Muscat, a low return will be earned i.e. the rate of interest that bank pay,
but the whole investment amount will be insured up to some specific amount that
is decided by Bank Muscat (Bouheni, et al., 2016).
BM’s Exposure in Minimizing
the Standard Deviation
Sector expertise
is one of the exposures of Bank Muscat in minimizing the standard deviation. The
bank has vast advisory for investment banking and the advisory work of
investment banking covers strategic advisory, rating advisory, infrastructure
advisory, and M&A (Merger and Acquisition) advisory, for instance, search
for disposals and joint venture partner, and family reorganization etc. In Oman
as well as in Muscat, a largest advisory platform is contained by investment
banking. The sector expertise guides the investors regarding their investment
decisions that where should they invest their amount and where should they
avoid to invest their amount. The appropriate amount to make an investment is
also guided by the that how much amount would be appropriate and beneficial for
an investor to invest in some particular project. The sector expertise guide investors
regarding major things that must be considered before making their investment
decisions such as drawing the personal financial roadmap at first stage by
taking an honest look at the whole financial condition, especially when the
investor is making a financial plan for the first time. The sector expertise
informs the investor about the risk associated with the financial plan. This is
how the standard error is minimized because the investor become cautious and he
or she invest carefully.
Average Return and Standard Deviation of Investment
Investment Mode
|
Quasi Equity
|
Debts Syndications
|
Initial Interment (OMR Mn)
|
20
|
16
|
Yearly Returns* (OMR Mc)
|
|
|
2013
|
0.4
|
2.4
|
2014
|
0.6
|
3.6
|
2015
|
6
|
5
|
2016
|
0.2
|
1.8
|
2017
|
2.4
|
1.42
|
2018
|
1.2
|
1.7
|
Average
|
1.8
|
2.653333333
|
Standard Deviation
|
2.2054478
|
1.387467717
|
The average
return and standard deviation of investment of Bank Muscat on Equity and Debts
are calculated separately. The above calculation shows that the average value
of equity is 1.8 while the average value of debts is 2.65; the average value of
debts is much higher than the average value of equity. On the other hand, the standard
deviation of equity is 2.2 while the standard deviation of debts is 1.3; the values
show that standard deviation for equity is much higher than the standard
deviation of debts which means that risks associated with equity are much
higher than the risks associated with debts.
It is recommended
to Bank Muscat to create a portfolio to mitigate or minimize the risk
associated with equity. The low volatility equity portfolio should be created targeting
the least volatile stocks. The forecasting option can be adapted to record the
trends of the stock market, if stock prices keep on decreasing then the investment
should be taken back. In order to mitigate the equity risk, it is very
important for Bank Muscat to remain active with the stock market updates. Dynamically
managing the equity exposure has the potential to limit the risk associated
with a downside in the times when equity markets are declining. Option strategies
providing protection against the equity volatility spikes are usable as the basis
of opportunistic when the insurance cost looks cheaper than earlier.
Furthermore, the
allocation of resources to real assets like commodities and real estate could the
hedge in the equity market if inflationary pressures develop due to the massive
balance sheets’ expansion by the central bank. Few of the alternative investments
can provide a source of return that is correlated weekly and that complements equities.
If the Bank Muscat follows these strategies, then the high values of the
standard deviation of equities can be reduced up to an acceptable level. On the
other hand, in order to minimize the standard deviation of debt, the Bank
Muscat can adopt various useful strategies. Typically, the debt portfolio has the
highest impact on the overall profile of risk and community banks’ earnings. A
platform can be provided by the strong credit culture for the Bank Muscat so
that the bank could successfully compete in the market and maintain the
competitive edge in the banking industry of Oman. Although the risk associated
with debt is inevitable, Bank Muscat can mitigate this risk by taking stronger steps
in a way that lending program could be strengthened.
In a nutshell,
there exists a trade-off between risk and return which means that an increase
in risk will inversely impact the return and higher risk is related to the
higher probability of greater returns and vice versa. The sector expertise
guides the investors regarding their investment decisions that where should
they invest their amount and where should they avoid to invest their amount. The
sector expertise informs the investor about the risk associated with the
financial plan. The average value of debts is much higher than the average
value of equity. The values show that the standard deviation for equity is much
higher than the standard deviation of debts which means that risks associated
with equity are much higher than the risks associated with debts. The possible
recommendations are provided to Bank Muscat to mitigate the risk associated
with equity and debt.
Conclusion on Bank Muscat
Investment Banking
The whole
discussion conclude that Bank Muscat has high risk associated with the debt as standard
deviation values for debt is greater than equity. Considering this we can
conclude that bank Muscat need to bring changes in the debt management
policies. Moreover, securities market can also get influence as a result of
changes in the inflation rate of country. Debt create high risk factor in all
offered investment portfolio that bank can tackle through limiting debt at the
optical level. Summarizing all we can say that increase in risk will decrease
rate of return on investment therefore there is need to control risk factor in
advance to build competitive edge in the competitive market.
References of Bank Muscat
Investment Banking
Bhattacharya, H., 2011. Banking Strategy, Credit
Appraisal, and Lending Decisions. s.l.:Banking Strategy, Credit Appraisal,
and Lending Decisions.
Bouheni, F. B., Ammi, C. & Levy, A., 2016. Banking
Governance, Performance and Risk-Taking. s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.