During
the past 30 years, there are various test methods is developed to evaluate the
toxic potency for the smoke on the different levels which is released in the
combustions. The potency data for the toxic is measured through the different parameters
like the , and the last one . On the other side the
is the assess time to incapacitation for the
fixed concentration. By using the different model of the toxic that requires
the input of a time concentration for the profile of the Asphyxiant gasses which
is present by the effective incapacitation of the mass of the lost model that needs
the inputs for the are of the mass loss. Now the inhalation of the Asphyxiant
gasses is the major of the Asphyxiant gasses including the CO, Carbon dioxide, and
hydrogen cyanide. As by the information the CO is the ,ainly the formed from
flaming as well as the smoldering of the combustion by the sufficient supply of
the oxygen. Now the hydrogen cyanide is that could be the fatal of the Asphyxiants
positions along with the 25 times of more than the toxic gasses of the CO. The
rate of the breath which is simulate the carbon dioxide is therefore increases
the respiratory for the minute volume and it is also increased through the 50%
and the 2% of the variations in the carbon dioxide (Chow, 2004)
Cumulative
Fractional; Effective Dose
The
concentration of the gas, as well as measurements of temperature, is analyzed
by using the FED approach and impacts for the firefighter of the different
tactics is an exposure of the potential trapped occupants. In the magnitude of
temperature which is decrease until the time of the inflexion point in a FED,
there are no significant differences among the transitional attacks along with
the interior attacks. The FED references are approximately 0.3 that is the criterion,
and it is used to determine the incapacitation for the susceptible individuals.
Whereas
the is the fractional doses for the CO as well as a
HCH respectively. Carbon monoxide, HCN, CO2 and
by the various additional effects from the low of the oxygen hypoxia in the NO2
plus the inhaled irritants. Carbon monoxide, HCN, CO2 and by the
various additional effects from the low of the oxygen hypoxia in the NO2
plus the inhaled irritants.
|
|
|
|
LANDING
|
|
|
|
|
OPEN BEDROOM
|
|
|
|
CLOSED BEDROOM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time
|
CO2
|
CO
|
O2
|
ELAPSED
|
Time
|
CO2
|
CO
|
O2
|
ELAPSED
|
Time
|
CO2
|
CO
|
O2
|
ELAPSED
|
Time
|
CO2
|
CO
|
O2
|
|
|
|
|
TIME
|
|
|
|
|
TIME
|
|
|
|
|
TIME
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.94
|
-14.5167
|
1
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.5
|
2
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.91
|
-14.5333
|
0
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
3
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.94
|
-14.4833
|
3
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.4667
|
4
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.91
|
-14.5
|
2
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
5
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.45
|
5
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.4333
|
6
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.4833
|
3
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
7
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.4167
|
7
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.4
|
8
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.45
|
5
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
9
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.3833
|
9
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.3667
|
10
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.4333
|
6
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
11
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.35
|
11
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.3333
|
12
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.4
|
8
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
13
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.3167
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
20.9
|
-14.3
|
14
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.3833
|
9
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
15
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.2833
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
20.9
|
-14.2667
|
16
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.35
|
11
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
17
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.25
|
17
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.2333
|
18
|
0
|
0.002
|
20.92
|
-14.3333
|
12
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
19
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.94
|
-14.2167
|
19
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.2
|
20
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.92
|
-14.3
|
14
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
21
|
-0.01
|
-0.001
|
20.94
|
-14.1833
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
20.9
|
-14.1667
|
22
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.92
|
-14.2833
|
15
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
23
|
-0.01
|
-0.001
|
20.94
|
-14.15
|
23
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.9
|
-14.1333
|
24
|
0
|
0
|
20.92
|
-14.25
|
17
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
25
|
-0.01
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-14.1167
|
25
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.91
|
-14.1
|
26
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.2333
|
18
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.93
|
27
|
-0.01
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-14.0833
|
27
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.91
|
-14.0667
|
28
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.2
|
20
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.93
|
29
|
-0.01
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-14.05
|
29
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-14.0333
|
30
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.1833
|
21
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.93
|
31
|
-0.01
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-14.0167
|
31
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-14
|
32
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.15
|
23
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
33
|
-0.01
|
-0.001
|
20.95
|
-13.9833
|
33
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-13.9667
|
34
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.1333
|
24
|
-0.01
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
35
|
-0.01
|
0
|
20.95
|
-13.95
|
35
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-13.9333
|
36
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.1
|
26
|
-0.01
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
37
|
-0.02
|
0
|
20.95
|
-13.9167
|
37
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.9
|
-13.9
|
38
|
0
|
0.001
|
20.93
|
-14.0833
|
27
|
-0.01
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
39
|
-0.01
|
-0.001
|
20.95
|
-13.8833
|
39
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.9
|
-13.8667
|
40
|
0
|
0.006
|
20.93
|
-14.05
|
29
|
-0.01
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
41
|
-0.02
|
-0.001
|
20.95
|
-13.85
|
41
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.9
|
-13.8333
|
42
|
0
|
0.006
|
20.93
|
-14.0333
|
30
|
-0.01
|
-0.002
|
20.94
|
43
|
-0.02
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-13.8167
|
43
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.9
|
-13.8
|
44
|
0
|
0.006
|
20.93
|
-14
|
32
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
45
|
-0.02
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-13.7833
|
45
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-13.7667
|
46
|
0
|
0.006
|
20.93
|
-13.9833
|
33
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
47
|
-0.02
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-13.75
|
47
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-13.7333
|
48
|
0
|
0.006
|
20.94
|
-13.95
|
35
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
49
|
-0.02
|
-0.002
|
20.95
|
-13.7167
|
49
|
0
|
-0.002
|
20.91
|
-13.7
|
50
|
0
|
0.006
|
20.94
|
-13.9333
|
36
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
51
|
-0.02
|
-0.002
|
20.96
|
-13.6833
|
51
|
0
|
-0.001
|
20.91
|
-13.6667
|
52
|
0
|
0.005
|
20.94
|
-13.9
|
38
|
0
|
-0.003
|
20.94
|
Graph
:

Toxicological
implications & Physiological manifestation’s
CO
is the colourless, non-irritating as well as the odourless along with the
tasteless that is ubiquitous for the atmospheres .The toxicological as well as
the physiological manifestation of the CO poisoning for the occupants of the
bedroom. The annual outdoor carbon monoxide concentration is roughly for the
0.12 parts which are the million of a volume for Hemisphere is about the
0,.04ppmv. The concentration for the Carbon monoxide is reported in the range for
minimum the 0.03 ppmv in the summer of the Northern Ireland Exposure of the carbon
monoxide is occurred by the inhalation of the indoor as well as outdoor air.
And the population which is living in the urban areas by the heavy vehicles of
the traffic, as well as the stationary sources, likes the gas refineries, coal burning
with the power plants. The toxic gasses like the primary Asphyxiant gases which
are the CO, HCH, as well as the upper limits for the incapacitation of the
threshold with the O2 concentrations
References of Assess time to the incapacitation of occupants due to inhalation of two main Asphyxiants
Borron, S. W. & et al, 2007. Prospective Study of
Hydroxocobalamin for Acute Cyanide Poisoning in Smoke Inhalation. Annals of
Emergency Medicine, 46(6), p. 794–801.
Chow, C., 2004. STUDY OF SMOKE EFFECT ON HUMAN BEINGS USING TOXIC POTENCY
DATA. International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codesp, 6(4),
pp. 301-306.
D.A., P., 2011. Fire Toxicity and Toxic Hazard Analysis. Conference:
Sixth International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards.
Gollner, M. & et al, 2011. Warehouse commodity classification from
fundamental principles. Part I: Commodity & burning rates. Fire Safety
Journal, 46(6), p. 305–316.
Gurman, J. L. & et al, 1988. Polystyrenes: A Review of the Literature
on the Products of Thermal Decomposition and Toxicity. FIRE AND MATERIALS
VOL, pp. 109-130.
Lee, T. L. & Jr, C., 1999. Smoke inhalation injury. Postgraduate
Medicine, 105(2), p. 55–62.
Levchik, S. V. & et al, 2004. Thermal decomposition, combustion and
fire-retardancy of polyurethanes—a review of the recent literature. Polymer
International, 53(11), p. 1585–1610.
Poh, W. D. & al, e., 2010. Tenability In Building Fires:Limits And
Design Criteria, s.l.: FIRE AUSTRALIA.
PURSER, D., 2019. ASET and RSET: addressing some issues in relation. FIRE
SAFETY SCIENCE--PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, pp.
91-102 .
Stefanidou, M. & et al, 2008. Health Impacts of Fire Smoke Inhalation.
Inhalation Toxicology, 20(8), p. 761–766..
Thomas, T. & al, e., 2002. A MODEL FOR ESTIMATING SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF
IRRITANT GASES ON EGRESS TIME IN HOME FIRE SCENARIOS. Proceedings: Indoor
Air.