Essay on NDIS Quality

NDIS standards cater guidance and benchmarking approach to the staff member specifically recruited to provide services to the customers. NDIS standards make the service providers capable to offer safe and high-quality services to the targeted audience. Indeed, NDIS standards are the reasons of framework functionality. The framework works as a theory or model in this scenario unless actions are supported by the NDIS standards. According to the information presented in the literature, National disability insurance scheme standards maintain the outcomes of safety and quality through regular assessment and improvement (Dss.gov.au, 2019).

The 6 disability standards represented in the national standards for service providers are rights, participation and inclusion, service management, feedback and complaints, service access, and individual outcomes. According to the national standard of rights service providers are given freedom of expression and decision making rights. While the national standard of service management cover the ways and methods through which service would be managed and service providers will have the accountability of their responsibilities and duties. According to the standard service provider are required to work with the disabled person and their families to promote their participation and activities in society. Although, feedback and complaints related information is also required to be collected and analyzed to use feedbacks for future improvement in service (Leonard, 2007).

4 core modules of NDIS standards which relates to the service provider are distinguished as hazards and risk management of service provision environment, service provision in access areas, rights, and governance. Services providers are required to provide provision for all possible environmental factors and hazards such as wastage of substances, safety, medication, and money. The service providers are also required to follow up standards concerning with transition of services and planning. Agreements and responsiveness are the keys concerning issues for service providers in the area of access. Service providers are further required to ensure best practices to provide case and high intensity personal duties. Management of treatment and care services at ventilator and nasogastric feeding are also included in the supplementary modules of service providers. According to the national standards, people having issues of disability will be given special support and assistance in the hour of need or case of risk (Arnott, 2015).

Furthermore, people having a disability will be provided by behavioral and psychological support also. Restrictive practices can be considered as the best choice for behavioral support. Less complex services and low-risk factors are associated with individual people. The verification process will be initiated for further confirmation about these complexities of services and risk measures. National standards also cover steps and proposed actions for the support of disable children. Early childhood disability-related patients will be given support which will relate to working collaboratively with the family of disabled children. Code of conduct also makes the implementation of NDIS standards possible in the selected framework and targeted area. To practice these NDIS standards by service providers in the appropriate manner it is essential to follow up principles in the planning stage (Pc.gov.au, 2011).

Key principles that relate to the NDIS standards are quality management principle and human right principles. According to the human resources principle, accessibility, non-discrimination, and equality are the key consideration. While in quality management principles emphasis is on continues improvement of service quality. Quality management principle also emphasizes the active participation of family members, friends, and caretakers in monitoring and reviewing the quality of services and support provided to the disabled person. Family and service provider should focus on the results and outcomes of the service provided to a disabled person. Additionally, engagement should be made in collaborative partnerships to ensure high quality services for disabled person (Green & Mears, 2014).