How has Boyd been able to accomplish so much in such a little time? Why has Simpson not been able to?

            There is a complete difference between Boyd and Simpson in terms of managing things and working with employees. The first key difference between them was their work approach. Boyd was able to gain more success, because he never hesitated from learning. He used leadership attributes like making good relations with employees, and motivating them to do well. Boyd tried his best to know that which things are able to drive performance of employees, and focused on those performance drivers and tried to enhance them. On the other hand, Simpson was not following this strategy; rather he kept on working with routine practices and policies. Boyd has an approach to motivate his employees to think out of the box, and use their thinking to develop new ideas to improve performance, whereas Simpson was the one, who did not looked for any changes, rather asked employees to follow given policies.

        Boyd was trying new things, and asked his employees to do so by bringing changes in their minds. He asked his employees to remain on course by making sure that they use new approaches, and change their work pattern to find a better one for the future. He also ensured that employees know their roles and responsibilities, which were of physical nature. Simpson was not a bad manager, but his intention to get satisfaction of customers’ was bit low as compared to Boyd. Simpson also has a different approach in dealing with tasks. He did not give focus to the quality of tasks, rather he always kept busy in thinking that one task is being done, and how the next will be done etc. He did not ask his employees to challenge set patterns, rather he was happy with set routine practices and policies. These differences in their approach can clearly show that why Boyd was able to achieve so much success in short time, which Simpson could not achieved in so many years.