The case study is all discussing about the
case of the well-known organization named as the Ag funds and the full name of
the organization is Ag finds financial service which is involved in providing
the financial service in the entire re4gion for accommodating their customer in
well manners. The Ag fund is located in
the Arkansas United states of the America the organization is providing the
financial services to the farmers of the region. The services are provided for the corporation
of the farmers. There were the few employees who were working the Ag funds. The case is all about the discrimination of
the Ag funds which is occurring just because of the mismanagement. Cynthia
Mitchell was performing as the rising stars of the organization. There are many
other people who are performing their duties in the Ag funds and they are named
as Peter Jones, Cynthia Mitchell and Steve Ripley (Schimmelpfenning, 2010).
They
all are performing their duties in arrange manners. Steven Ripley was an
impressive young man with the age of the 24.He has educational background with bachelor
degree in finance. The Cynthia Mitchell
has personal experiences at the Houston in her job. The organization was facing
the several issues as; the abilities, qualities and potential for the specific position
has been founded in the Steve Ripley but the many people of the staff and peter
did not want to hire him for this position just because of black. The major discrimination
which I securing in the Agfunds that is related to the Merit vs. Minorities and
colored and women. The discrimination with an organization can destroy the infrastructure
of any organization particularly discrimination based upon the color and gender
based (Alfen, 2014).
You may or may not agree with Cynthia
Mitchell’s decision to place Steve Ripley at a position where his downfall was
certain not because of his job-ability fit or performance Analyze what should
Cynthia Mitchell do?
At the AgFund the Cynthia Mitchell is the impressive employees as
well as clearly bright. But her rationale idyllic might be the downfall for her,
as the District manager Arkansas. For her incredible performance she rose by
ranks in very quick step, in an Ohio region as the sale representative. For the
motivation the small part of the performance is the attribute for her, that she
also drew with getting the Indiana opening as she is graduated for her training
program in AgFunds. For the position the most qualified is, as a district manager
for the Indiana branch, as eth Mike graves is hired for the applicant of lesser
due to the don think. In this region, the customer would not respond as the
sale representative for women.to prove him wrong the discrimination fueled the Cynthia as the Ohio branch as well as her
performance that led to her to become the youngest district mangers in the
AgFunds over a struggling Arkansas branch when she was promoted to take. If
a bit inexperienced her new employees seem to be very capable (May & May, 2012).
I
am not agree with the decision of the Cynthia Mitchell’s to placing to placing the Steve Ripley at a
positioning of the certain downfall because she is placing him just because of
his colored not according to his job-ability for the fit of the performance. The bias is creating just because of
the decision of the Cynthia’s and her own experience of dissemination creating
bias according to his decision. The Cynthia Michel must be take decision about
to hiring according to his ability rather than his color and the discrimination
can destroy the culture of the Ag Funds (Bowman & West, 2014).
Should she terminate Steve because of his
performance results etc.?
No she should not terminate Steve just because of his performance
because she had placed him at a positioning of the certain downfall at where
the success can be unimagined. The below given strength and weakness analysis
can be analyzed should why she should not terminate him (Pozgar, 2012).
If she Hire Steve;
Strengths
·
Pygmalion
effect
·
Boosting
Employee confidence
·
Free of
social disruption according to the point of view of the employee’s
·
Adds
Diversity
·
Recovering
Cost
·
Racial
arbitrage
Weakness
·
Golem
effect
·
Chance of
Leaving
·
Some
clients may be offended
·
Uncertainty
If she doesn’t Hire Steve;
Strengths
·
Employer’s
Advantage
·
Employer’s
point of view
·
More
control of the management team
·
Free of
social disruption
Weakness
·
Cartel
formulation
·
High
performance employee not utilized
·
Legal
issues
·
Lack of
Opportunities
·
Public
Image
The major weakness behind his quitting the job is economic slowdown Doesn’t
his performance (Hammaker & Knadig, 2016).
Should she have placed him in this position
to begin with?
She can got the various advantages as because
have Hire Steve because;
·
Hire
Steve
·
for a
past 15 years as a growth is declining an
Afro American the best district to hire
·
Prejudiced
customer can be won over.
·
as a
secular organizations AgFunds can project itself
·
From
employees of the career of African Americans Steve should learn who succeeded
at a firm.
·
At the
beginning of career support from Cynthia is Unconditional
·
Morale as
well as confidence for Boosting Employee. Motivation to work hard as well as offer
their best.
·
At
AgFunds the successful summer internship economic analyst on behalf of US MBA
from UCLA, stint oversees as an.
·
Top
trainee in these Years are bright, conversationalist Personable, excellent
quick witted,
·
Through
perseverance zeal to succeed. Steve Ripley showed himself, determination
There can be several disadvantages; if she doesn’t
hire Steve
·
Don’t
Hire Steve
·
Existing
customers is Loose already.
·
Further
go down the Profit
·
Quit
Company
·
The companies
which have select Steve there, Join additional company which has a earthly work
environment.
·
Liberal
organizational cultures as well as Building a Secular Building as the Image.
In this “Analysis” section, discuss as many
important OB related issues you think are or could be related with the issue.
For example, if there’s a discrimination of any kind, how does it affect the
organizational culture?
The main issues in this case are;
Discrimination between employees
On the grounds of the gender; At AgFunds
various territories of the business is conservative as well as the customer
were comfortable in the women business. Even the Cynthia is more capable as
compare to the Bill Hawkins that is selected for the coveted position in the
Indian Northern due to of same.
Now on the ground of the race, in several
different districts the racial prejudice is not existed, as the customer is
unwilling for the working purpose by the people form the black race. As the
whole organization as well as the persons they led them to their failure,
because they don’t trust them. A year’s top trainee, the Steve Ripley was black
that was thought not assigned as the role of the Arkansas in the district for
the citing of the same reasons. The AgFunds has made the little effort to reforming
the attitudes of the customers as well as to supporting the minority representative
for the cultural difference along with the Racial to strong influence the
AgFunds decision that present the show racial biases.
Now the issue two is;
Dictating the hiring policy; supposed the
Customer Prejudices
The deciding resource of the deployment for
the organization policy is the effect of the resource utilization that the
customer supposed in the irrational outlook. Meritocracy is forced, in the
bargain that take to back seat during the cases where the discrimination is in
play (Alfen, 2014).
What is the level of ethical decision- making
required when managers’ fiduciary obligations requires them to make decisions
that violate their own personal ethics.
Decision making in the AgFunds Company
influence the discriminatory of the customers. The minorities of the issues is
evident by the company that having the low expectation for the blacks which is
becoming very successful. Explanation as well as analysis for the ethical level
of decision making in the fiduciary obligations will be made that based on the
expert obligations.
Cynthia offered the Steve job due the right qualities as well as, the
well-educated candidate. To influence the decision making if the Cynthia refers
the discriminating customer, to hire the Steve it might be put the AgFunds
Company in the risk of the discrimination claim
(Boghraty, 2018).
What should be done to manage demographic and
cultural diversity?
To manage the cultural diversity as well as demographic,
as manger there are some serious ethical issues, when it deals with the demographic
diversity. By considering the both post future and past, the Cynthia spend the
next few days. For first time she realized that in what way protective the
ivory towers .The main thing that would be to understand how the diversity is
the strength of the organization (Schimmelpfenning, 2010).
Recommendation
The AgFunds should plan the long term motto
as well as suppose it as the part the mission statements of the AgFund. That is
equivalent to the tolerance as well as equality for all. The long term motto shall be indirect socially
relevant task. For the mangers the sensitivity of the program is designed that
must be provide the insights for the tolerance as well as sensitivity in the different
business district. The sensitive program should focused on the sensitive
districts which formulate the policy deal by a same , for going forward the
discrimination that is exist , and AgFunds also create the employee opportunities.
The AgFunds must add the standby work by the trainee pools, who can distributed
as, the relevant openings. Review of the company should evaluate as the part of
the policy. Now for the personal review of systems its marketing strategies as
well as advertising strategies, in addition to the products which being offered
in the faltering markets (Boghraty, 2018).
In the analysis for the various weak areas it
will help to improve on the same conditions. The change in the promoter needs
the gradual approach. The motto of tolerance is spread as well as acted on it
as the better approach for the instincts acting. As compare to deal with the
societal intolerance being a practical that is not affected on the AgFunds
standing. The prejudices are adapted that is necessary for sometimes as well as
the risk of blatant could be avoided , if the resources are not used then it
would more specific for the demand of the organization in the better way (Hammaker & Knadig, 2016).
References of The Best of Intentions Summary
of the Case
Alfen, N. K. (2014). Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food
Systems. Elsevier.
Boghraty, B. (2018). Organizational Compliance and Ethics.
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Bowman, J. S., & West, J. P. (2014). Public Service
Ethics: Individual and Institutional Responsibilitie. CQ Press.
Hammaker, D. K., & Knadig, T. M. (2016). Health Care
Ethics and the Law. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
May, S. K., & May, S. (2012). Case Studies in
Organizational Communication: Ethical Perspectives and Practices: Ethical
Perspectives and Practices. SAGE.
Pozgar, G. D. (2012). Legal and Ethical Issues for Health
Professionals. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Schimmelpfenning, D. (2010). U. S. Public Agricultural
Research: Changes in Funding Sources and Shifts in Emphasis, 1980-2005.
DIANE Publishing,.