Conclusion and Recommendations of Organization Structure on Employee Behavior

            The organizational structure of the companies represents the behavior and relationship of the employees and managerial staff in the organization. Flexible and modern organizational structure is the structure that provides authority and importance to the employees by allowing them to take the decision towards the duties and tasks given to in order to avoid the stressful and rigid commutation and relationship that can reduce the employee's interest towards the job. The rigid policies in the organizational structures cause lax performance.

        Employees want to be appreciated and trusted by the managers. In case, it the policies are strict and rigid it can cause a negative impact on the suspicion and abilities of the employees. The quality of work and tardiness issues can reduce the abilities of workers in the organizations (Olson, Slater and Hult 2005). The unfair treatment of managers with the employees in the employees induces a negative impact on the loyalty of employees. The lower self-esteem in employees can lead to legal issues or self-termination.

        The findings of the research can be concluded as the Saudi Electricity Company is earning success in the market because of the strong communication channels and coordinating relationship within employees and managerial staff because of the modern organizational structure adopted by the organization. However, there are some recommendations that need to be taken into consideration to bring more improvement in the organizational performance. Saudi Electricity Company should have a proper system of performance appraisal as a benchmarking technique can be used to evaluate and measure the changes in performance. (Price 2011) Thus through this evaluation organization will easily identify the poor performing employees taking advantage of the flexible and modern organizational structure.

References of Organization Structure on Employee Behavior

Bustinza, Oscar F., Ali Ziaee Bigdeli, Tim Baines, and Cindy Elliot. 2015. "Servitization and competitive advantage: the importance of organizational structure and value chain position." Research-Technology Management 58 (5): 53-60. Accessed 11 18, 2018.

Chen, Chung-Jen, and Jing-Wen Huang. 2007. "How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective." International Journal of Information Management 27: 104-118. Accessed 11 18, 2018.

Griffin, Ricky. 2015. Fundamentals of Management. Cengage Learning. Accessed 11 18, 2018.

Kainkan, Marie. 2015. "The Impact of Work Environment on Employees' Job Satisfaction in Saudi Electricity Company in Tabuk Region." Business Management Dynamics 4 (9): 35-50. Accessed 11 18, 2018.

Moore, Marcia. 2017. The Effects of Organizational Structure on Behavior. 09 26. Accessed 11 18, 2018. https://bizfluent.com/list-5899387-effects-organizational-structure-behavior.html.

Neal, A., M.A. Griffin, and P.M. Hart. 2000. "The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior." Safety Science 34 (1-3): 99-109. Accessed 11 18, 2018.

Olson, Eric M., Stanley F. Slater, and G. Tomas M. Hult. 2005. "The Performance Implications of Fit Among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior." Journal of Marketing 69: 49-65. Accessed 11 18, 2018.

Price, Alan. 2011. Human Resource Management. Cengage Learning. Accessed 11 18, 2018.