Summing
up the discussion it can be said that the Taiwan and not recognize its
jurisdiction, that made this case very complicated for the legal authorities of Taiwan and Taipei to handle. The Taiwan
prosecutor is inquiry a Canadian spectator over a case of fraud concerning
Canadian nationals and Taiwanese. The reason of killing his girlfriend not very
serious and it seems to be a fight between both people. The Chan prior to
killing his girlfriend seems to get involved in activities of theft according
to the investigation get from the friends of both Poon and Chen. The case is
even more complicated it has said by the judge. It has need of suspecting
questions before to placing the charges by Taiwan against him. The jury is
reaching to the classic example of the judgment of the guilty or not guilty. It
also cannot be terminated when evidences are observed by the judges as
insufficient to convicting the defendants. It is possible that a person is
charged with as a firefighter for killing another person and at the same time
he might be charged with assault. Furthermore, the alleged person Chan’s arrest
held in Hong Kong where he was caught against with the handling stolen good and
theft charges. Consequently, one state or federal government cannot take legal
action on a person two times for one crime.
This significantly increases the intimidation of duplicative prosecution
or an enormous and growing conduct.
In this
case, in detail analyses are necessary by the court to assume about the
rational happening of the jury. Give emphasis to the needs for data and
information investigation that focus on murder dynamics. It is also important
to analyze the importance of place of crime and where the killing of the victim
is take place. There are said to be some issues of the double Jeopardy
infrastructure that need to be deal with in the Hong Kong-Taiwan loophole, but
the major subject is that there are not a lot of case studies supporting this
case.