According to research conducted
by Landis, Hill, & Harvey (2014), it
is reviewed that the entire leadership management in the organization is not
said to leaders. The task of the managers is to make every employee happy and
direct him to do a particular task but on the other side, the leader as is one
who explores the talent in individual and makes him come up with all of his
efforts. In this article, the authors
demonstrate the quality of the person which makes him distinct from other
people and makes him a leader all of his decisions, struggles, and qualities
make his way to the leadership. Many of the things in the articles is very
similar to the lecture of the class, according to the author the leader is one
who has approval from the public regarding his leadership. He must be able to
recognize the needs and wants of the masses so they may use his power to
fulfill all of the demand and expectations of the people (Landis, Hill,
& Harvey, 2014).
According to research conducted
by Banks, McCauley, Gardner, & Guler (2016),
it is reviewed that some of the theories in this articles are just a few years
old as most are very compatible with the theories of the leadership. As it can
be said that the leadership is always been an essential tool for the successful
organizations and countries. In the company, a good leadership in the management
always results in more productivity by the employees and the firm is also
likely to survive in the increasing competition in the market. The technologies
are also becoming advanced and the regulation of the government is also
changing according to it. These change
situations also cause very much change in the attitudes of the employees (Banks,
McCauley, Gardner, & Guler, 2016).
There is no doubt that with the
good leadership practice, the managers are more likely to generate more profit
and revenue by motivating the employees to be more effective and productive in
their everyday task. Good leadership
also helps the team to work in more productive and efficient way. As we, all
know that how is it important for the organization to have the more
collaborative team in all of its sectors. A good leader knows how to
communicate with their employees and team members because a good communication
in the company always results in the building good relationship with the
employees. The best quality of a good
leader is that he knows what he wants to accomplish and, the right ways to make
other people in the organization conscious of their work (Banks,
McCauley, Gardner, & Guler, 2016).
According to research conducted
by ODUMERU & OGBONNA (2013), it is
reviewed that Transformational and transactional styles of leadership have fascinated
the researcher’s interest in current time. At the same time as some consider both
styles of leaders same and some consider both of the leadership styles dissimilar.
This article provides a preliminary viewpoint into the distinction between transactionary
and transformational leadership sketch from confirmation in text. The transactionary
and transformational leadership theories are theoretically different, some fundamentals
of the transactionary leadership also included in the transformational leadership.
It can also be said that perhaps transformational leadership is one of the most
significant management aspects. This is for the reason that leadership is main
features which donate enormously to the organizational wellbeing (ODUMERU &
OGBONNA, 2013).
According to research conducted
by Effelsberg, Solga, & Gurt (2014), it
is reviewed that capacity of the transformational
leadership is to improve willingness of the employees and the supporters to connect
in the selfless pro-organizational behavior, , benefit behavior of the organization
is unsuitable to be instrumentally use for the purposes of self-serving and approved
out in spite of outstanding personal expenses. In addition, it also intended at
representative organizational recognition to arbitrate this relationships. The
overall transformational leadership has been measured to promote
pro-organizational behavior of the employee not just away from potential but
also clear of self-centeredness (Effelsberg, Solga, & Gurt,
2014)
According to research conducted
by Wang, Oh, Courtright, & Colbert (2011),
it is analyzed that transformational leadership is completely connected to personal-level
admirer act across types of the decisive factor, with a good association for background
performance than to task recital crossways most situation. In calculation, the characteristics
of the transformational leadership were absolutely connected to the performance
at the squad and association levels. Furthermore, both relative importance and
meta-analytic regression analysis time after time demonstrate that the
transformational leadership had an augment achieve over transactional
leadership to forecast individual-altitude background performance and performance
at the team-level. In opposing to the expectation, on the other hand, no amplifying
effect of transformational leadership over dependent recompense was found in task
performance at individual-level in case of transformational leadership (Wang, Oh,
Courtright, & Colbert, 2011).
References of transformational leaders on employees of organization
Banks,
G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2016). A
meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for
redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly , 27, 634–652.
Effelsberg,
D., Solga, M., & Gurt, J. (2014). Getting Followers to Transcend Their
Self-Interest for the Benefit of Their Company: Testing a Core Assumption of
Transformational Leadership Theory. J Bus Psychol , 131–143.
Gunelius,
S. (2010, April 7). 5 Dominant Traits of Successful Leader. Retrieved
from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2010/04/07/5-dominant-traits-of-successful-leader/#e9c775541ce3
Kakkar,
H., & Sivanathan, N. (2017, August 11). Why We Prefer Dominant Leaders
in Uncertain Times. Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2017/08/why-we-prefer-dominant-leaders-in-uncertain-times
Landis,
E. A., Hill, D., & Harvey, M. R. (2014). A Synthesis of Leadership Theories
and Styles. Journal of Management Policy and Practice , 15,
97-100.
ODUMERU,
J. A., & OGBONNA, I. G. (2013). Transformational vs. Transactional
Leadership Theories: Evidence in Literature. International Review of
Management and Business Research , 2 (2).
Wang,
G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational
Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review
of 25 Years of Research. Group & Organization Management , 36
(2), 223–270.