Foreign
direct investment is a process of making access to the capital and assets of a
country by the local entities of other countries. Individuals and companies
outsource their operations in order to get benefits from the lower cost labor.
Companies also consolidate the companies of other countries by purchasing
shares and ownership of the subsidiary company. Foreign inflow direct
investment is to provide opportunities for the other countries while outward is
to invest in other countries (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, &
Voss, 2007).
China and the United Kingdom both are economically strong countries that are
trying to promote their outward foreign direct investment with the increase in
the inflow of foreign direct investment. During 2003 China was the second
leading country in the whole world (after the United States) that was spending
and encouraging on the inflow of foreign direct investment.
European
international organizations found china as the revenue generating country because
of the lower cost of available production resources and increase of population
that play the role of customer also. The government of the china took the
notice of the situation and changed their policy towards outflow with the
increase in the trend of globalization, outsourcing, and consolidation. While
the situation of the United Kingdom is quite opposite to China (Buckley,
Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007). They were leading
in the outward foreign direct investment but after 2008 United Kingdom faced a
sharp decrease in outward foreign direct investment. In the paper comparative
analysis of the china and United Kingdom are evaluated by considering a number
of factors, facts, and figures. There are a number of issues discussed
concerning with the outward foreign direct investment with the recommendation
that can be used to make the situation of outward foreign direct investment
better in both countries.
2.
Outward
FDI Analysis of China and UK for the Foreign direct investment
Foreign
direct investment projects the trend of making the investment in other
countries of the world. In accordance with the economics, it describes the
ownership of a company or entity in the other companies in a different country
rather than their own country. Foreign direct investment has two types as
inflow/inward FDI and outward FDI. Both types of FDI has the direct impact on
the GDP and overall economy of the country (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007). Therefore, when the
trend of globalization and outsourcing is increasing countries are changing
their policies to encourage Foreign Direct investment inflow and outward FDI.
The research is based on the comparative analysis of the two big economic
powers China and the UK in the Outward FDI trend and patterns (Jncc.defra.gov.uk, 2008).
3. Current outward FDI
trend and pattern in China for the Foreign direct investment
Outward
Foreign direct investment of a country includes the financial flow and
investment of a country in the other developing countries of the world. The
current trend of outward foreign direct investment in the china is now going to
be strengthened. In the past few years, the inflow ratio was more than the
outward ratio. Companies from the other areas of the world were making the
investment in the china by starting up their production units there because of
the low-cost labor availability. However, now China is also investing in the
foreign world and promoting trade to make the economy of the country strong and
stable (Wang & Zhao, 2017).
In
one year, duration, the foreign direct investment by a country can be
calculated through the recording of cross-border transaction value. In this
way, financial flows include the transactions of intercompany debt transaction,
transactions of equity, and reinvestment of earnings. Outward FDI of the china
increases the foreign investment and improve the economic condition of the
other countries (Burghart & Rossi, 2009).
Figure 1: Current
Outward FDI in China
In
the comparison to the BRIC countries, China is performing star performance and
with the extensive time the government of China reform all the FDI policies.
China is attracting a higher amount of FDI relatively from the last 18 years in
the comparison of developing countries. The special status of China is due to
the separate set of preferential policies and rules. The policies are for the
development of China and transform the northeast regions of China along with
the western regions (Oecd. org, 2017). There are several indicators that
define the investment increase and economic factors of the country one of them
is the foreign direct investment of the country in the global market. The key
agencies in the china are passing through the approval process for the
investment process. The state administration for the foreign exchange is one of
the exploratory studies that induces model formal conditions in the forces as
driven by the Chinese. The determination is based on the special conditions for
the theoretical explanation. The emerging economy of China explains the
concentration of foreign investors and the industrialization of the country.
The strengthen role as an investor country for China is higher as compared to
the other countries. China stands on the eight most essential and known
position for the FDI sources and development of the counties. The economic
advantage is similar to the Hong Kong, South Kore, and Singapore. In China, the
foreign direct investment theory is one of the emerging and economic fact that
requires special consideration and there are three main potential arguments
regarding the investment and progress. These three factors include capital
market imperfections, institutional factors, and special ownership advantages.
The ownership is related to the state and capital is highly available at lower
rates and the capital rates are soft budget constraints.
The
guided directory for the development of China regarding the FDI includes four
types of categories such as allowed projects, encouraged projects, restricted
projects, and prohibited projects. In order to improve the levels of exports in
the china, the policies of Chinese government can be subdivided into three
categories such as compulsory, natural, and voluntary (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007). In general conditions, there are six different
types of the features as allowed by the patterns of china outward FDI in 2015. China
is becoming a net exporter for the foreign direct investment on the basis of
financial markets and the global economy. The china is emerging as a global
investor and has distinct flow for the inward and outward investment.
The disproportion is between the national
oversea FDI stock and the income conditions. China has the large potential for
the performance and the investment of international profile level. In the
sectoral distribution sectors, the major changes are for the outward investment
of China and engage the higher range of investment. The large sector for the
business services and leasing process were measured in the terms of the
concentration as in 2008 for the accounting. The near variation was for the
total over 2011-2015. The wholesale trade and retail trade for the mining was
for the financial intermediation and the real estate (Sauvant & Nolan, 2015).
The
major five sectors are linked with the investment, the first sector was mining
that includes oil and gas exploration, washing and mining of coal, non-ferrous
metal and ferrous metal processing. As according to the graph, the share
increase was 40.3% regarding the mining and it was the largest sector for the
FDI concentration of the government and the investors. From the sharp contrast
comparison, the FDI sector got more accounted that was 7.7% from all the
regions of total investment.
The real estate investment was 1.8% of the
total investment in the country. The enormous and higher sector of expansion
was observed during the larger proportion of shares in the foreign direct
investment in China. The growth of the estate sector increased and became
triple from the original at 5.3%. The notable annual growth rates were reducing
and decreased to 17.9% in 2015, 67.1% for 2014, and highest was observed during
2013 as 95.9%. In a nutshell, the foreign investment track was not linear but
in fact, the track is diversified and favors the tertiary industry.
In
the investment analysis of China, the foreign direct investment was determined
as three-quarters of all the stock and flows in China during 2015. In some
context, the transitions of China are based on the consumption that leads to
the economy and services. The investment of China is not even for all the
regions in the world as it makes the uneven distribution for the whole world.
From the continent level, the outflow of investment in China is more than 70% of
the whole investment. The ease in the outflow is low particularly in Europe
while the flow expands for 82% of the total investment in 2014. The sharp
decline was observed for 34% and the country level was a part of the whole
investment and small economies. The variation in the investment has an impact
on the financial state of the country. The issues are mixed with the
performance and growth of performance particularly in 2015. The FDI flow of
Australia and the European Union reduced in the comparison of China at 16% and
the 44% on the year to year basis. In the notable flow capital issues are more
than twice the increased and global flows.
The
clustered open economies have attracted nearly 62% of the foreign direct
investment for the outflows and the stock condition is at the 60% of the whole
stock in the yearly reports. The shares of Hong Kong in China are an outward
investment and the flow of investment decreased to 17% of the whole conditions
as compare to the 58% during the year 2013. In the recent years, the significant increases
are considered for the outward FDI of China that was related to the non-state enterprises
and nonofficial FDI stock advanced for the consecutive conditions. The dramatic
changes are based on the ownership of the whole infrastructure. There are two
main factors that can be interrelated such as networks and the channels that
can be established for the medium size entities and for the small conditions.
The investment is growing with the time and evolution in the china and non-state
investors are playing significant roles for the aforementioned sectors and
higher diversification in the medium regarding the foreign direct investment in
the china.
4. Current outward FDI
trend and pattern in the UK for the Foreign direct investment
The foreign direct investment
provides higher information for the values and the measured investment. The
investment can be inward and outward and includes earning along with the flow
of direct investment. The foreign direct investment relates to the cross-border
for the country to country issues. The assets capture all the investment done
by the United Kingdom including the foreign investment and investment of
companies based in the United Kingdom (Fdiintelligence.com, 2012).
The global flow of FDI during 2006
increased and exceeded $1.3 trillion for the exchange rate and inflow FDI
became half of all the net capital flow. The FDI flow pattern was established
for the investment of north and south. The countries are emerging and have
significant variation in the originating economics and receiving economics (Andreff, 2016). The increase of
annual flow was in the investment funds that changed for the period of
2002-2006 and funds reached $49 billion in 006. The investment reached $ 735
billion. During 2006 UK was listed in the 4th biggest and largest
source for the outward FDI and the list continued as USA, France, and Spain.
The investment flow in the United Kingdom was changed from all the previous
time and the higher emphasis was on the investment of resource industries. The
FDI flow of United Kingdom was between the three principal industries and these
principles include services, manufacturing, and resources. The general fall in
the UK FDI services was $14.5 billion with down percentage of 59% and
investment reached $35.5 billion and the financial services FDI increased to
reach $22.1 billion (Oecd. org, 2017).
The increase was in $10.5 billion.
The FDI manufacturing in the UK fell to $16.4 billion, the decrease in
percentage was 11 percent as compared to the $ 18.5 billion as reported in
2005. The FDI of food production increased up to $15.5 billion from $ 5.0
billion. The FDI resources of the UK increased from $9.5 to $18.5 billion for
net disinvestment. The emphasis on resources was on the extractive industries
such as hydrocarbons, quarrying, and mining. The foreign direct investment of the
United Kingdom was 54% and in the case of North America, it was 25%. The
principal area of interest in the present work was geographical areas outside
of the OECD for the United Kingdom and China.
The growth values for the foreign
direct investment positions in the United Kingdom was for the overseas
investment and the liabilities of FDI changed. The increase was observed for
the FDI positions of the United Kingdom and positions held abroad for 2016 FDI
assets. As a result, the position of net FDI in the United Kingdom started
declining and fell to $50.8 in 2015 and $12.5 billion during 2016. The lowest
net positions were observed in 1997 since the comparable records of the
country. The values of foreign direct investment (FDI) liabilities increased to
the high value for the acquisitions and inward mergers through 2016. The higher
transactions for the publicly reported assets were during 2016. The higher
acquisitions were observed for BG groups, ARM holdings, and SAB Miller (Ons. gov. UK, 2018).
Based on the analysis it can be
observed that exchange rate movements were provided with the supports and the
values of FDI assets changed during 2016. The negative direct investment
positions have some sterling rate of exchange that was not depreciated. The net
earnings of United Kingdom foreign direct investment fell down during 2016 and
then the marginal changes imposed a negative impact on the comparable records.
The latest fall in the countries measured in 2011 was due to a downward trend.
The regions that contributed in the
fall of FDI during 2016 were higher and the majority of fall was due to North
America on the contrary FDI credits of United Kingdom increased from EU. In the
case of industry in the United Kingdom, most of the UK FDI credits were highly
attributable for the decrease in the mining and the quarrying conditions were
related to the grouping of the industry. Opposite to the situation the debits
increased for all the board of industries and groups were analyzed. The
analysis of FDI asset values faced decline during 2016 due to decline in the
credits and the appearance becomes attributable for the higher companies and
largest contribution was for the 25 companies of United Kingdom for foreign
direct investment (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007).
The credits were remained increasing
for the investment and investors. The value of debits was similar to the FDI
during 2011 and then credits fell down for the period. After that, the trend
continues to higher extend along with the negative marginal net earnings of
foreign direct investment (FDI). The
debit values change for $1.7 billion and it was much higher than the credits while
the credits were equivalent was 1.5% as compared to the current account
balance. The return rate of the UK was $50,000 and the values changed to $1
million. The return rate was 5% and the higher values of investment were on
income.
Figure 2Outward
FDI trend in UK and China
Figure 3
Comparative Analysis (Li & Zhang, 2017)
Figure 4Outward
FDI 10-year Data
5. Factors that shaped
the outward FDI patterns of the Foreign direct investment
Foreign
direct investment plays the significant role in the development of the overall
economy of the world and countries that are directly or indirectly linked with
the process of outward foreign direct investment. There are a number of factors
that directly or indirectly influence the outward foreign direct investment of
the china and United Kingdom. Some factors have great influence that shapes the
overall trend of outward foreign direct investment in the whole world as global
trends and dynamics.
6. Institutions of the
Global economy
The
institution of the Global economy is playing their roles effectively in the
world to enable the world progress rapidly with the collaboration of their
countries. Because of globalization and outsourcing under-developing and second
world countries also get the opportunity to earn better revenue and bring
changes in their lifestyle (Morck, XU, Fan, & Yeung,
2009).
Job opportunity because of outsourcing by a developed country cause to
strengthen the economic condition of the local people of an under developing
countries.
While
on the other side investor country earn more profit by building profit margin
in the expense and revenue. As through making the investment in other countries
they can reduce the expense of raw material and labor force. Thus, both
countries take advantage of the currency difference (Morck, XU, Fan, & Yeung , 2009). Because of this
importance, global economy institutes are working on globalization,
outsourcing, and foreign direct investment.
There
are many international institutes are working for the global economy as World
Bank and international banks. In the kingdom of United Kingdom, the major institutes working for the
global economy are Institutes of Economic Affairs, National Institute of
Economics and social research, Institute of global law, economics and finance,
and global governance institute. While on the other side the institutes of the
global economy in China are also dealing with the programs and policies that
encourage the global trade and foreign direct investment (Nandi, 2012). Other than all
these government and banks are also playing the role of supportive institutes
for the global economy.
Government
and political institutes of the United Kingdom and China encourage and motivate the inflow of the foreign direct
investment and outward foreign direct investment by making supportive policies
for the foreign investment. The government set the tariff on the import and
export of the goods in the international market (Morck, XU,
Fan, & Yeung , 2009). In this way, United Kingdom institutes are less supportive of the
people of the United Kingdom as
compared to China in the matter of outward foreign direct investment.
United
Kingdom tax rate on export in other
countries of the world is more than the rate set by the government of the
china. While on the other hand, the United Kingdom is also unlucky for outward foreign direct investment as taxes on
export other than European countries is higher than the tax rate of European therefore,
they are mostly limited to the European countries only. The tax rate on the
trade within the European countries is almost free for the United Kingdom (Pettinger, 2017). While China is
investing in the diverse areas of the world. World trade market is equally open
for the china and the strong geographical location of China supports China in
this way.
The economic institutes of both countries
are working as the formal organizations in order to undertake the activities.
Society members are the major stakeholders of the company; therefore, they
create such institutes to run the factions in the appropriate manner. According
to the definition of the institutes by the North in 1990, institutes are like
the rules in a game that formally shape the human interactions. Economic
institutions in the china and United Kingdom provide bases and framework for the whole activities conducted in
the country in the economic and financial manner. Global economic institutes of
China motivate the economic activities as foreign investment, economic
development, entrepreneurship, and trade in the international market. The main
role of these institutions is to develop the framework for the consumers and
other investment related industries in order to provide guidance and assistance
in the spending, foreign exchange operations, and investment process.
According
to the analysis of 2008 because of the assistance of the institutions of the
global economy China earned the increase in GDP with the percentage of 10.4.
Because of this powerful contribution China appeared as the big power in the
outward foreign investment in the overall OECD. In 2008 China recorded the
outward foreign direct investment was 56742 and at that time the United Kingdom
the outward foreign direct investment was recorded 197411. Economic
institutions of China worked hard, developed new policies, introduced new
strategies, and get entrance in the diverse markets to make improvement in the
outward foreign direct investment. As a result of all this in the just short
time duration of 4 years, China started leading the United Kingdom. According
to the records of 2012 outward foreign direct investment of the United Kingdom
was 20767, and China was 64963 that is more than $44196. Thus, the whole
situation is clearly describing that institutions of the global economy have
direct influence over the foreign direct investment and economy of a country.
7. Arguments: Global
economic trends and dynamics
Global
economic trends and dynamics fluctuate
with the passage of time and change in the international market. In the past
companies were only limited to make the investment in their own countries.
Management and business person were with the claim that by going outside the
country to avail financial benefits as low-cost labor and cheap material
availability companies suffer a lot as handling a diverse and quite different
type of labor is not an easy job. Culture and language barriers played the
effective role in this case. It was considered difficult to hire quite diverse
labor for operations as because of difference in the culture of management and
labor chances of conflicts get the increase. Employees motivation and job
satisfaction are must for the improvement in performance. Therefore, at that
time, it was considered that even the expense can be reduced through
outsourcing but the cost of production and error in production will get the
increase that is not desired to for customer's satisfaction. While now trends
are getting changed. New modern management courses have enabled the managers to
handle the cross-cultural and diverse labor. In the modern business world
developing the relationship with the labor of other countries and starting
production units in other countries is getting common. One major reason for
this outsourcing is the strategy of the companies to expand the target market
of the company in a geographical way. Through geographical expansion companies
increase customers and sales. Therefore, the trend of outward foreign direct
investment is increased in present times. China is rapidly adopting the changes
and trends in the world. China started investing in the other countries of Asia
and Europe. For instance, China is investing in Pakistan and Africa. The trend
in the outward foreign direct investment is going upward in China as the figure
2 outward FDI trend in the United Kingdom
and China describe the trend with years. On the other side trend and
dynamic are also impacting the outward foreign direct investment in the United
Kingdom. The United Kingdom faced
many ups and downs in the outward foreign direct investment.
The
overall global trend in the outward foreign direct investment is going towards
slow recovery after facing the steep decline trend. According to the analysis
because of change in trend outward foreign direct investment was decreased 18%
from the previous records in 2009. The global market made recovery in the first
half of the next year. During 2011 and 2012 global market projected great
momentum. The rise in the outflow was actually made after 2013. In the whole
situation, the United Kingdom was
showing negative results and China records as one of the leading countries in
outward foreign direct investment.
8. Global movements of
goods and factors of production
Factors of production and movements of goods that has the impact on the
outward foreign direct investment are wages rates, labor skills, transport and
infrastructures, commodity and clustering effects. Factors of production are
land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. Consumption of goods in the country
contribute or stand against the outward foreign direct investment (Pettinger,
2017).
When the consumption rate of a country goes towards high, companies from other
areas of the world working in the similar industry try to start up their
production plant in that country to take advantage from exceeding in demand.
Companies from other countries of Asia and Europe are investing in China
because of the huge number of populations in China.
Companies produce products at a cheap cost in China and sell
in China also while selling in other markets (Nandi, 2012). Thus, they take
benefits from both sides as the decrease in cost and increase in revenue.
Similarly, China invests in the countries that pay better in return. The
currency value of China is more than many countries. In China, the purchase of
land is not so easy. Therefore, Chinese purchase land in the countries in which
they operate. For instance, chinses are investing in Pakistan and Africa they
purchase land at cheap cost there to build their production sectors and offices
of the companies. European countries are best for the European countries as the
United Kingdom as compared to the china particularly when it comes to the
currency difference.
Companies of the United Kingdom can easily purchase land while when china tries to start up a
production sector their expense goes up because of deference in the currency
value (Pettinger, 2017). Thus, the factor of
production limit China to the Asian countries and countries of Europe that has
the currency other than the United States Dollar. The global movement of goods
is also a strong factor that influences the outward foreign direct investment
of China and the United Kingdom (Morck, XU, Fan, & Yeung,
2009).
After the production of the goods transportation and shipment of the products
and goods also includes transportation expense in the overall cost of the goods
and products. In the United Kingdom, transportation and shipment expense is
more than China.
Therefore, when they make the investment in the other countries,
they take advantage but China pays more amount in transportation investment (Nandi, 2012). Therefore, China
selects the country for the outward foreign direct investment that has lower
rates of land, raw material, labor, and transportation. All desired qualities
Chinese business market is available in Pakistan and Africa. China import
products and export products to the Pakistan and Africa by road and sea
shipments. For import and export purpose China has constructed roads in
Pakistan that relates both countries and enable movement of goods and commodities.
The United Kingdom also exports products to other countries
at the time of delivery they calculate the charges of transportation in the
cost of the products that increase the cost and price. When they move products
in the metropolitan areas, they use trucks to move the products around to the
delivery market. Tangible goods like pens, machinery, and mobile phones are
easy to move around as compare to the vegetables, fruits, meat, eggs, and other
packed foods (Pettinger, 2017). Food and sensitive
products like plastic products and glass material products contain the risk of
spoilage and breakage. Efficient delivery of the products is must for the
customer's satisfaction. Therefore, outward foreign investment in such products
and goods is not considered profitable unless the safety measures are used and
high return on investment has greater probability.
Automobile companies
of the United Kingdom and China open their outlets in the targeted countries
and access the services of shipment agencies for safely delivering the products
to the targeted market. They produce and
assemble the cars and other products and store in their warehouse and bring
into the market when demand rise (goodsmovementmatters.org, 2018). Because of change in the modern
transportation system now the movement of goods and production of goods is
becoming easy for the countries that are highly developed and familiar with the
modern approaches of management.
9. Role of international
business organizations and their activities
International
business organization as multinational companies are working almost all over
the world. Geographical expansion of the multinational companies is because of
their cost-effective production strategies (Morck, XU, Fan, & Yeung,
2009).
While companies also sometimes use market penetration approach to enlarge the
target market of the company. International organizations and their activities
play the active role in the outward and inflow of foreign direct investment
(FDI) of the countries. Companies are now with the point of view that
investment in the other countries expands operating markets for the companies.
Fine examples of such companies are Apple Company, Nike, Nokia, Honda Auto
Mobiles Company and Procter and Gamble company.
These
multinational countries have their production sectors in various areas of the
world. Companies of the United Kingdom are starting up developing production
units in other countries because they are covering the large geographical area.
Goods movement from Europe to Asia (as Asia is one of the largest consumer
markets in the United Kingdom) increases the transportation and shipment
expense. And it comes to the large-scale increase in expense reduces the profit
margin for the companies that are not affordable in the highly competitive
markets.
Therefore
companies of the United Kingdom and China are going towards outward foreign
direct investment in the countries where the tariff rate is lower than in their
country (Li & Zhang, 2017). International
business organizations also flow up the strategies like corporate social
responsibilities to attack the customers. Under-development countries welcome
them in their countries because they bring investment into the country.
Production units of these international organizations provide job opportunities
to the citizen that contributes to the overall economic development in the
world.
Big
organizations like nestle create their own farms of vegetables, fruits, and
dairy products to provide healthy food to the customers. They develop the
agriculture of the country. China is leading the world in this manner also (Buckley,
Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007). They grow food
items in the countries that have fertile land for agriculture and sales in the
market at high prices. The main business of the Chinese companies is concerned
with the financial services and information technology. The major market for
China in the information technology is for Asian countries. While companies of
United Kingdom are mostly concerned with the daily use items. Cosmetics and
daily use products of the united kingdom have great demand in the market,
therefore, United Kingdom targets the countries that can provide raw material
at the cheap rates.
10.
Issues
in international activities
There is a significant increase in
the outward FDI and China can be attributed to a number of factors. These
significant factors include low-cost labor and the abundant supply is no longer
for the country. The shift in development model was for the consumption that
led to the growth pattern. The Chinese enterprises are significantly higher for
the manufacturing process and the construction process (Li & Zhang, 2017). The problem is
linked with the production capacity and the decrease is due to declining of
return in the capital. The production capacity of Chinese companies is significantly
lower than the demand for products. The decline in the capital is due to the
increasing number of investors and challenges (Andreff, 2016).
The recent key drivers that boom in
China is related to the infrastructure investment. The second issue is security
concerns in the country that adds hindrances to the sustainable development of
the country and social stability. China is making efforts to improve and ensure
the access to energy resources and supply of raw materials that supply to the
world. The upgrading of the industry depends on the growth of investment and
upstreaming of the industries. The financial crises and international
investment are facing higher and strong headwinds. The economic deleveraging
for the corporations appears for the world phenomena (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007).
The faster growth of global
economics is higher particularly in BRICs countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and
China) while the forecast was higher and major centers include economic growth
factors. The understanding for the investment considered the growth of
economics and essential understanding of all the major fields (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007). The relative
importance for the investment of United Kingdom was in different business
sectors. The issues are mainly sustainability problems as associated with the
major sectors in the country. The investment particularly foreign investment is
highly required for the growth of the country (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007).
The analysis includes suggested FDI
patterns and the analysis of Global investment. The basis of analysis for the
issues is associated with all the major sectors in the country. The global
investment and analysis for the patterns of the United Kingdom suggest some
global trends of investment. The likelihood and environmental impact include
the prime sectors for instance financial services, food products, extractive
industries, agriculture, fisheries, and forestry. The attraction levels are
really low for the direct investment but these activities are highly significant
for the perspective of impact on the ecosystem of the country (Sauvant & Nolan, 2015).
11.
Recommendation
of Foreign direct investment
The FDI regulations of China and the
United Kingdom should be reviewed and the process must clarify as well as
simplify the process of investment for the economic benefits of China and the
United Kingdom. The activities should engage the foreigners in the regular
dialogues between China and critical issues (Burghart & Rossi, 2009). The consultation is
required to resolve the disputes, the global investment needs to be improved in
China while the structural transformation needs to be reviewed for the economy
of China. The capital allocations should be improved for the worldwide
efficiency and helps the investors to determine the opportunities in business. The
Chinese investors need to explore new business investments and business
opportunities and the obvious global business investment. The state-owned
enterprises find more public confidence so the sustainable development in
perspective and investment must be considered (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007).
In order to increase the
sustainability their needs new implications for the foreign direct investment
in the United Kingdom. The government of the United Kingdom works for the
collated and the additional data. The initiatives are highly required to reduce
the issues and to increase the investment at the local and foreign stage. The progress
of investment should be against the provisional framework. The extending
condition analysis shows that the United Kingdom requires higher and sufficient
improvement in trades. The identification of all the indicators and impact of
sustainability are based on the four key sectors including biodiversity that
has specified impact (Li & Zhang, 2017). The indicators for
the stock exchange of United Kingdom and industry shows requirements of
sustainability of leaders and qualified respective sectors.
The provisional framework for the
improvement of foreign investment must consider the ongoing JNCC and work for the
identification of conservation values of different areas but the priority should
be for the economic and political links. The research ongoing JNCC work for the
biomass and bioenergy programs requires consideration. On the basis of
above-mentioned analysis and the findings, it can be recommended that the
government and business communities of China and the United Kingdom must
recognize the attractive benefits and the outward FDI for the economy of the
country. The government should express all the investment regions and should
welcome foreign investment in the country. The higher research practices should
encourage the future policies of accurate data information that can be
conducted for the performance and comparison (Buckley, Jeremy, R., Liu, & Voss, 2007).
12.
Conclusion
on the Foreign direct investment
Based on the above analysis the state-owned
enterprises in China and the United Kingdom depends on the different
considerations. In the view of FDI, the foreign sources consider the operations
and implementation of new state-owned enterprises. The suspicion investment of
foreign companies depends on the economic growth of the country as well as
political intentions. The national security of country, technological transfer
system, labor, environment of business, employment system, standard compliances
and law, and intellectual property rights are the main factors that generate
impact on the growth of business and increase in the foreign direct investment.
The higher profitability and demand of services increases the probability of
foreign direct investment in the country. To conclude the analysis, the
increase, and rise in the global investment defines the natural outcomes and
structural transformation in the economy of China. The investment in particular
and financial flow in the industrial location needs to be considered for the
international divisions and changes in the global context. The state-owned
enterprises find more gain from the public and redistribution of income across
the world.
References of the Foreign direct investment
Andreff, W. (2016). Outward Foreign Direct
Investment from BRIC countries: Comparing strategies of Brazilian, Russian,
Indian and Chinese multinational companies. The European Journal of
Comparative Economics, 12(02), 79-131.
Buckley, P. J., Jeremy, C., R., C. A., Liu, X.,
& Voss, H. (2007). The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct
Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(04),
499-518.
Burghart, N., & Rossi, V. (2009). China’s
Overseas direct investment in the UK. International Economics, 01(01),
1-24.
Fdiintelligence.com. (2012). UK tops European
inward and outward FDI tables. Retrieved 07 08, 2018, from
https://www.fdiintelligence.com/Info/What-s-New/Press-releases/UK-tops-European-inward-and-outward-FDI-tables
goodsmovementmatters.org. (2018). Why Goods
Movement Matters. Retrieved 07 08, 2018, from Goodsmovementmatters.org/:
http://goodsmovementmatters.org/
Jncc.defra.gov.uk. (2008, 05). Tracking UK
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into selected overseas economies.
Retrieved from jncc.defra.gov.uk: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/global_trackingUKForeignDirectInvestmentSummary1.pdf
Li, D. C., & Zhang, D. X. (2017). CHINA AS A
GLOBAL INVESTOR RECENT TRENDS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADA. Occasional
Paper Series, 03(01), 1-32.
Morck, R., Xu, L. C., Fan, J. P., & Yeung , B.
(2009). Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment: China versus the Rest of
the World. World Development, 20(10), 1-14. Retrieved 07 08, 2018
Nandi, S. (2012). Comparative analysis of Foreign
Direct Investment trends in emerging economies. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 37, 230-240. Retrieved 07 08, 2018
Oecd. org. (2017, 10). FDI IN FIGURES.
Retrieved from www.oecd.org:
http://www.oecd.org/investment/FDI-in-Figures-October-2017.pdf
Ons. gov. The UK. (2018). UK foreign direct
investment, trends and analysis: January 2018. Retrieved from
www.ons.gov.uk:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/balanceofpayments/articles/ukforeigndirectinvestmenttrendsandanalysis/january2018
Pettinger, T. (2017, 06 26). Factors that affect
foreign direct investment (FDI). Retrieved 07 08, 2018, from
www.economicshelp.org:
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/15736/economics/factors-that-affect-foreign-direct-investment-fdi/
Sauvant, K. P., & Nolan, M. D. (2015). China‘s
Outward FDI and International Investment Law. Journal of International
Economic Law, 01(01), 1-42.
Wang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2017). Outward Foreign
Direct Investment from China: Recent Trend and Development. Chinese
Economy, 50(05), 356-365.