Motivation is a
psychological method used to enlarge the performance of workplaces. Alongside
other values like personalities, attitudes, and perceptions, motivation is an
essential component of behavior. Motivation can arouse and energizes
individuals and their performances in workplaces. Universities may sometimes
not find this aspect important because faculties are not paid according to the
production of students (Blaskova, 2013). Although such institutions may not find
motivating faculty as useful, money is not the only component that can ensure
workers value their jobs (Osibayi, 2015). Offering incentives make people show
some level of commitments and job satisfaction, and this can contribute to high
university performances. Although students pay large amounts to universities in
the form of fees, the universities cannot be blamed alone for their failures. It
means that the money such students pay may be a waste as learners may not
achieve good results (Dobre, 2013).
Universities that have
a motivated workforce receive good results because their faculty efficiency is
improved. Motivated workers are willing to work and assist students in their
weak areas, and this will help to enhance the learning abilities of students.
It is easy to point out problems that workers may be experiencing in their
workplaces when they are willing to work (Sawar, 2010). When workers feel they
get the right treatments at work and their efforts recognized, they may assist
an institution to deal with problems that can reduce its efficiencies (Osakwe,
2017). It becomes easy to attract many students to the university, which can
contribute to its stability. It means that well-motivated workers can improve
the achievement of an institution’s goals.
Consequently, an
institution that does not motivate workers can lead to dissatisfaction. When
one worker is not motivated, and their working morale is down, other people in
the office can feel the same (Manzoor, 2011). Such workers can quit their jobs,
and the institution may not achieve its objective. Additionally, university
faculty who are not motivated can lead to poor work performances (Shaheen,
Sajid, &batool, 2013). In most cases, this can be identified through students?
Results and lack of such student to attend classes. When the results of a
particular university begin to drop, parents will not take their children to
enroll in such schools, and this can lead to decreased revenues for such
universities.
References of Rationale of The Motivation of Teaching Faculty Employees in Universities
[1]
|
D. .. A. Elnaga and
A. Imran, "The Effect of Training on Employee Performance," European
Journal of Business and Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 137-146, 2013.
|
[2]
|
R. Baral and S.
Bhargava, "Work-family enrichment as a mediator between organizational
interventions for work-life balance and job outcomes," Journal of
Managerial Psychology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 274-300, 2010.
|
[3]
|
A. Hameed and A.
Waheed, "Employee development and its affect on employee performance a
conceptual framework.," International journal of business and
social science, vol. 2, no. 13, 2011.
|
[4]
|
M. N. Gange and E.
L. Deci, "Self-determination theory and work motivation," Journal
of Organizational Behavior, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 331–362, 2005.
|
[5]
|
S. Y. Sung and J.
N. Choi, "Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of
training and development investments on learning and innovation in
organizations.," Journal of organizational behavior, vol. 35,
no. 3, pp. 393-412, 2014.
|
[6]
|
U. Gneezy, S. Meier
and P. Rey-Biel, "When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work," Journal
of Economic Perspectives, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 1–21, 2011.
|
[7]
|
W. Mason and D. J.
Watts, "Financial incentives and the “performance of crowds”," SIGKDD
Explorations, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 100-108, 06 2009.
|