Which general concepts, theories,
hypotheses, or modeling approaches are underlying the model’s design? Explain
the relationship between these basic principles, the complexity expanded in
this model, and the purpose of the study. How were they taken into account? Are
they used at the level of sub-models (e.g., decisions on land use, or foraging
the- ory), or is their scope the system level (e.g., intermediate disturbance
hypotheses)? Will the model provide insights about the basic principles
themselves, i.e. their scope, their usefulness in real-world scenarios,
validation, or modification (Grimm, 1999)? Does the model use new, or
previously developed, theory for agent traits from which system dynamics emerge
(e.g.,‘individual-based theory’ as described by Grimm and Railsback [2005;
Grimm et al., 2005])?Answer: ...
Emergence. What key results or outputs of the model are
modeled as emerging from the adap- tive traits, or behaviors, of individuals?
In other words, what model results are expected to vary in complex and perhaps
unpredictable ways when particular characteristics of individuals or their
environment change? Are there other results that are more tightly imposed by
model rules and hence less dependent on what individuals do, and hence ‘built
in’ rather than emergent results? Answer: ...
Adaptation. What adaptive traits do the individuals have?
What rules do they have for making decisions or changing behavior in response
to changes in themselves or their environment? Do these traits
explicitly seek to increase
some measure of
individual success regarding
its objectives (e.g., “move to the cell providing fastest growth rate”,
where growth is assumed to be an indicator of success; see the next concept)?
Or do they instead simply cause individuals to reproduce observed behaviors
(e.g., “go uphill 70% of the time”)