The Science of Error, How Polling Botched the 2016 Election

        This article is written for describing the various points and sceneries of the election which are holding in the New York United states and this article written to describing the 2016 election. In the 2016 Clinton have got 71% chance to winning this election on the presidency seat.  The analytical techniques are also discussed in many other sites which are talking about the arguments which are against to his presidency.  Clinton have enough percentage to win in the elections as observing the current state of people and the voting criteria.

        The voting predictions were considering true according to the description of voting from 2012 seems to be different in this time. The dot polls that are used in this time of voting are very much different and unique. The data polls were in a large and high quality in order to make the voting system fair. The poll is conducted to view the predictions of people about who is going to win in next elections or to whom people wanted to be winner. All the people will poll by clicking at the button which will show to them at the time of polling about their favorite candidate.

        The polling system was very fair and it predicts a very accurate value of the views of the people about the candidate. The results and the figures that have been conducted through this polling are accepted by the people and according to the people’s suggestions the results in the real elections are opposite to the polling conducted by people themselves. The victory rate is very much better an increased due to this type of polling activity and the main thing is that the people rely more on these polling rates and figures. (Siegel 2016)

Reference of The Science of Error, How Polling Botched the 2016 Election

Siegel, Ethan. 2016. The Science Of Error: How Polling Botched The 2016 Election. November 09. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/11/09/the-science-of-error-how-polling-botched-the-2016-election/#4d084a513795.