Review of Group Members

            The present report is complete access review of all the group members. The review of group members was based on the filter controls related to the specific work objectives and abilities of all the members. The dynamic group is configured to access the goals and all the members are assigned with work in which they are compatible. The criteria of selection for the positions of each member was based on the hard working ability, courtesy in attitude, work understanding, and levels of responsibilities. The analysis of each member is quantitative and qualitative and based on the performance. There are three and four criteria for analysis and performance measurement and all the workers are analyzed on these basis. The effective group members include Gianna Porter, Carson Neumann, and Emily Barker. The project requires the work to be completed on time with perfection. The criteria of analysis is mentioned below:

Commitment and preparation of Group Members 

        Gianna Porter is a hard worker employee and she works efficiently therefore she is placed on the 1st number. She is able to understand and works with the responsibility. In terms of hard work and commitment, Carson Neumann is also good, as he never involved in any conflict with others, and always keeps calm. So the ranking number given to him is 2^nd. In overall terms, Emily Barker is a good person, but when comes to commitment and hard work, she is not the one, who does hard work. That’s why she is given 3^rd rank number.

Contribution of Group Members 

        Carson Neumann is a courteous person and he works with others collectively. Through the whole work career in the firm he never had any conflict with others. He is a good worker and placed at 3^rd. when comes to contribution, Emily Barker is not great in this regard so she is given number 4th. As far as Gianna Porter is concerned, she is 1^st in this category as well, because she always likes to contribute, whatever she can.

Help process of Group Members 

        Even Carson Neumann is cooperative but Emily Barker helps the company in many ways therefore she is placed on the 2^nd. Emily Barker does not help too much in the process, but she does put some effort, and that’s why she is given number 4^th place in the rank order.

Performance Perfection & Rank Order of Group Members 

         The success of the business is based on the working abilities of all the workers. In the team members Gianna Porter is performing well relative to other employees. Carson Neumann as well as Emily Barker is also good enough that’s why the team was able to perform well, but they certainly can improve a lot in this regard. In this group project, the rank order given to team members would be 1^st to Gianna Porter, 2^nd to Carson Neumann, and 3^rd to Emily Barker on the basis of their contribution and efforts to achieve perfect performance. These rank numbers are close to each other, which assert that there is not much to separate between these team members.