An academic achievement cannot
bet met successfully, if students don’t know that how they would approach their
learning process, and what learning style and strategy would be suitable for
them. It is a process, which helps students to actively monitor their self-cognition,
motivation as well as behavior that how they would accomplish their academic
goals. A science extended program for students is crucial in so many ways, as
it allows them to understand the science field, and get ready for the next
level. That’s why it is important for students that they adopt learning styles,
which would allow them to gain more understanding of the subject, and enrich
their knowledge level. The learning style and self-regulated learning strategy
allows students to control their own learning process at their own pace, which
is good for them. There can be students, who are slow in understanding the
concepts, and there can be other ones, who are quick o grab the ideas, so both
kind of students would come up with totally different learning and self-regulated
learning styles [3]
Different learning styles and
models have been explained by researchers and it is important to compare and
contrast few of them to get an idea that how beneficial they can be for
students to get success in the extended science degree. The first learning
model is the David Kolb’s learning model, which has four stages in the learning
process. This model was presented by Kolb in 1984, which can be important for students
to develop their learning style inventory. Kolb explained that learning process
is the one, where abstract concepts are adopted and then those concepts can be
used in various kinds of situations. Kolb also asserted that knowledge can be
created by absorbing a learning experience. His four-stage model talks about
four pints in the learning cycle including concrete experience, reflective
observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. In this
process, a student faces a new experience, and then shows reflective
observation on that new experience. Then third stage is abstract conceptualization,
where reflection helps the student to develop a new idea, and last stage is
that learner applies his/her developed idea in the real world situation [4]
Kolb’s Learning Cycle
As compared to Kolb’s learning
style, an alternative learning instrument was developed by Honey and Mumford
with the name of Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ), which is quite different
from the Kolb’s model in terms of completing its cycle of learning. In this
type, the researchers have talked about four kinds of learners. The first one
is “activists”; they are the ones, who build their learning process on the
basis of experience. The second type of learners is “reflectors”, who develop
their learning process on the basis of reflective observation. The third type
is called “theorists”, who learn things by exploring interrelationship of ideas
and their relevant association with different concepts. The last kinds of
learners are pragmatics, who involve in practical actions to learn about
different things. The important thing in this learning style is that focus has
been given to learners, and students from the extended science degree program
can review these four types to assert that which category they fall into as a
learner [4]
It is important to understand
that different learning styles are crucial for the overall learning process,
and every learning style can be different in its own ways, but they all serve
the same purpose, allow learners to understand the learning process and their
own cognitive and learning behaviors in their respective fields. Two learning
styles have been mentioned above, which are different to each other. The third
important learning style model is Felder-Silverman learning style model. The
great thing about this model is that it is not only good for students, but it
is also useful for teachers as well to enhance their learning process. Both can
understand through this model that what their individual learning style is. There
are four dimensions of this model. The first one explains the difference
between the active and reflective learner that how differ in their learning
approach. The second dimension of the model is to distinguish between visual
and verbal learners. The third element of the model talks about sensing vs. intuitive
learners. And the last one discusses the sequential vs. global learners [5]. All of these four
dimensions help to understand learners and their learning preferences, and this
model is quite different from the first two ones mention earlier.
It is important for students to
understand that learning style is not the only important thing, rather regulation
of learning is also crucial for the whole learning process. It is extremely
important that learners do regulate as well as control their individual
learning process. The learning process can be enhanced and managed by individual
students by controlling their behavior, motivations as well as meta-cognitive capabilities.
The process of meta-cognition is an important one, because it helps learners to
get awareness about their cognitive process. It also allows them to exert
control over their cognitive process. In the meta-cognition, the individuals
can set goals, do self-evaluation and plan things so that they have control
over their learning process. In self-regulated learning concept, the learners
are not considered passive learners; rather they are the active participants of
the learning process [2]
There are different techniques
for the learners to make sure that their learning strategies are improved and
help them accordingly in gaining knowledge. Each student may have different
goals and different educational backgrounds, when deals with their extended science
program. So, it is important for them to look for appropriated strategies. The first
strategy in this regard is cognitive learning strategy. In this strategy, the learners
have to handle learning material with appropriate strategy so that they can be
effective in the learning process. The second strategy for the learning is meta-cognitive
learning strategy. In this strategy, the individuals can learn to monitor as
well as plan their activities related to their cognitive learning, and they do
so by self-regulation of their cognition process. The third strategy for the
learners is resource management strategy, which asserts that learning environment
of the individuals should be controlled and managed by them, like they have to
manage their education environment as well as time to make sure learning
process is effective enough [6]
It is important for students of extended
science program or any other field that they have to come up some great self
regulated learning strategies so that they can achieve their ultimate academic
goals. In recent past, the trend has been observed that self-regulation is key
for students in their academic achievements. The students who are better in
their self-regulation for learning, they are more likely to perform better than
the others, who are not good in self-regulation of their learning. The mental
ability should not be mixed with self-regulated learning as both are different
things, rather self-regulation is a process, which is directive in nature, and
directs the students towards adopting better approach for their learning
process. According to Zimmerman, there are three self regulated phases for the
learning process, shown in the below figure; [3]
There are different self
regulated models that extended science students can consider for their
educational development and learning. These models can really help to gain so
much in the academic field, if they are propeller understood and taken with
complete focus. One of the considerable works for these students is the work of
Zimmerman, who came up with different self regulated learning (SRL) models. The
first model developed by Zimmerman is called Triadic Analysis of SRL. This
model is crucial for science students as it would allow them to look at three
relevant dimensions. The first one is their learning environment, the second
one is their person level interest, and the third one is their learning
behavior. This model is viable for students to consider their social and learning
cognition [7]
The second model is called Cyclical
Phases of SRL, and the third model by Zimmerman is Multi-Level model. This
third model can also be crucial for science students to manage their learning
process, and come up with best academic achievements. In this model, the
students can gain self competency by adopting four elements in their learning
process including observation, self control, emulation, and self regulation. The
Adaptable Learning Model developed by Boekaert in the 1990s, can also be beneficial
for the students as this model comes with two important dimensions. The first dimension
is the learning mode and its mastery, whereas the second dimension is the
coping mode. This dual process SRL model can help students to concentrate on
important dimensions of their learning process, and self regulate it for better
academic results [7]
References of The process of educational development
[1]
|
H. Goodarzi and M.
Mirhashemi, "Self-Regulated Learning and Cognitive Learning Style among
psychology students," Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific
Research, vol. 3, no. 7, 2013.
|
[2]
|
A. Alharbi, D. J.
Paul, F. A. Henskens and M. R. Hannaford, "An Investigation into the
Learning Styles and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Computer Science
Students," in Proceedings ascilite 2011 Hobart, 2011.
|
[3]
|
S. Cassidy,
"Self-regulated learning in higher education: Identifying key component
processes," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 36, no. 8, pp.
989-1000, 2011.
|
[4]
|
F. Romanelli, E.
Bird and M. Ryan, "Learning Styles: A Review of Theory, Application,
and Best Practices," American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol.
73, no. 1, 2009.
|
[5]
|
S. Graf, S. R.
Viola, T. Leo and K. , "In-Depth Analysis of the Felder-Silverman
Learning Style Dimensions," Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 79–93, 2007.
|
[6]
|
G. Yusri, N. M.
Rahimi, P. M. Shah and W. H. Wah, "Cognitive and metacognitive learning
strategies among Arabic language students," Interactive Learning
Environments, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 290-300, 2013.
|
[7]
|
E. Panadero, "A
Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for
Research," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, no. 422, 2017.
|