The researcher was expected to
find that prior knowledge helps plays an important role in understanding the
meaning of passages and comprehension. A passage couldn’t be simplified without
prior experience and information in the same field of comprehension. In
understanding the linguistic information, it was expected that past information
in the same direction is necessary as meanings will be simplified that way. In
the article, researcher was actually expected to demonstrate that Ss have a better understanding of the
passage with a prior knowledge of the same passage.
In the article, the experiment or
method consisted actually a phase of acquisition followed by recall and
comprehension rating, namely two tasks. In the experiment, there were 5
independent groups or communities consisting of ten Ss in each group. There were three other experiments similar to the
first one and the rating scale was similar as well. There were two contexts, No
Context consisted of Ss who didn’t
have a prior knowledge while the Context Before included Ss who saw the proper picture of context before hearing the lines
or passage. There were other three groups as well. In the experiment, the
contextual perquisites behaved as an independent variable while Recall and
Comprehension acted as a dependent variable. Subjects of one group were given
some prior information and told to recall the passage after hearing while the
other group’s subjects were not given any prior information and were told to do
the same.
The results of the experiment
were actually analyzed using Dunnett’s test and it was found that Ss who were given some prior information
were able to recall better and they had more ideas compared to the ones who
were simply asked to hear the passage and recall strongly. With the absence of
prior context, the recall and comprehension ratings were low and it suggested
that prior context helped in storing semantics.
In the article, it has been found
that when it comes to processing data or information, contexts are important. Through
all four experiments, it was analyzed that group of Ss with knowledge prior to the activity performed better in
recalling.
What I liked about the article
was the fact that only a single experiment was not conducted and there were
diverse experiments giving accurate results about recalling power with context [1].
References of Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding: Some Investigations of Comprehension and Recall
[1]
|
J. D. Bransford and
M. K. Johnson, "Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some
investigations of comprehension and recall," Journal of verbal
learning and verbal behavior, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 717-726, 1972.
|