Conclusion of Titanic Design Flaws and Failure

        Summing up the discussion it can be said that the disaster of Titanic is in fact the best example which illustrates how the mistakes of engineers can lead to disastrous impacts. Through the analysis of problems due to the misconduct of engineers, it can be concluded that with a proper knowledge of engineers and better materials, Titanic would have been able to resist the disaster. With double bottoms, created by having steel’s two layers that increase the ship’s length and keeping them away through a distance of five feet, and increasing the bull’s sides, the hull’s bottom plate would have been damaged without puncturing the top plate. With the utilization of double bottom, the entrance of water into the ship would have been minimized.

    Through the extension of double bottoms, no damage would have been sustained to the watertight compartments. With the addition of another steel layer to the ship’s sides, it would have been ensured that hull is not damaged since there would have been enough distance between the outer and inner sidewalls. The hull would have not been punctured at all this way. Additionally, if the compartments’ transverse bulkheads had been raised, the water would have not spilled over the adjacent compartments and thus damaged should have been evaded.