The research conducted by [5]
was based on the measurement of slip resistance for the footwear in winters in
case of ice and snow and the analysis includes the maximum incline that is
achievable for the slip resistant footwear. The
research was based on the assessment of different methods that are valid for
the analysis of winter surfaces, footwear, and outsole designs [5]. The use of protective footwear is increasing
because protective footwear prevents from injuries slips and falls in the winter
conditions. The anti-slip devices are developed to reduce probability of
slipping and injuries in the winter season. In the present work the slip
resistance devices are evaluated by determining the maximum inclined angle and
surface combinations [5].
The research by based on
measuring the method for the testing of winter footwear on the basis of
ecological terms that includes involvement of actual human testing while
walking on the realistic surfaces of ice and snow and to measure the slip
resistance. The evaluation of protective footwear by based on eight participant
testing process related to designs of footwear [5]. The sleep resistance was measured for different
types of surfaces including wet ice, dry ice, and soft ice after snow. The
maximum incline angle was measured for the slip resistance and the participants
walked up and down on the different incline angles of surfaces. The evaluation
of result indicates that evaluation of footwear on different surfaces is
required to measure slipping probabilities for all different winter footwear [5]. The standard testing was mechanical beach test to
measure the actual performance of footwear. The coefficient of friction was
determined for each footwear slip resistant on plane surface and on inclined
surface. The anti-slip devices are mechanical devices such as stationery step
simulator [5]. The stationary step stimulator is a portable device
that measures the slip resistance of footwear in in both outside and inside
surfaces. The only issue for process is lack of validation.
In order to determine the
slippery slope the testing of gate and footwear is involved in studies. The
anti-slip devices have greater ecological validity for sleep resistance,
surface analysis, and comprehensive environmental conditions [5]. The primary and secondary data was collected in
winter lab. The beach testing was used to determine maximum achievable inclined
angle for all footwear in dry ice and snow conditions. According to the results
there are different designs of footwear that respond differently for wet and
dry surfaces. The environmental conditions are required to be considered for
the detailed footwear analysis and these conditions include surface
temperature, surface characteristics, ambient temperature, and contamination
characteristics of ice [5].
In the previous research [6] the main process was assessment of anti-slip devices
particularly for the healthy individuals and the system considered different
ages of users and different types of slippery surfaces. The effective
prevention strategies are required to reduce the rate of slip and falls in the
ice covered areas. The use of anti-slip devices can reduce the risk of fall and
slips on different surfaces particularly in the winter season [6]. The aim of research was to investigate about the
best anti-slip devices and how it can be designed for larger group of individuals.
In the Swedish market there are three different designs of anti-slip devices
including heel devices, wholefood device, and foot blade devices [6].
The research determined
efficiency of these devices on different surfaces by measuring the balance
safety conditions, walking balance, and posture analysis [6]. The evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of
anti-slip devices was based on three criteria such as appearance, balance, and
safety conditions. The research illustrates that the heel devices are more
valuable as compared to other devices because these devices are stable and
portable. The heel devices uncomfortable to use and are safe in case of Snow
covered areas. The preference is based on the walking balance, safety
conditions, and conditions required by the customers [6].
The research conducted by [7] was based on analysis of anti-slip devices in order to
prevent the pedestrians from slipping, falling, and injuries during the winter
season. The pedestrians are more exposed to fall accidents on the Icy surfaces.
The study was based on quantitative analysis and the data was collected from
hospitals and police stations for the injuries, slippery of roads, icy and
snowy roads. The research suggests appropriate footwear and anti-slip devices
to reduce the fall rate [7].
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fb0e/1fb0e0ea5d7dfc318c7f7be1af2975c3e3e5c351" alt=""
The uses of anti-slip devices
demonstrated that these devices improve the ability to walk at normal speed in
different weathers. The aim of the study was to identify the pedestrian
exposure during the winter season, occurrence of falls and slips, and prevention
method by the anti-slip devices [7]. The questionnaire was developed for analysis and
questionnaire includes background of the participants, health conditions,
attitude, surface temperature in the snowfall areas, and previous experiences
about falls and slips. According to the analysis the most used device was foot
blade anti slip devices that reduces the falls and accident rate [7]. The use of foot blade anti-slip devices reduce the
accidents and fatal injuries. By using the anti-slip devices the risk of
accidental fall and actual fall reduced as 67% and 64%. The researchers
concluded that use of anti-slip devices increases the exposure of user without
falls and accidents. The traffic environment can be improved in the winter
season by increasing the use of anti-slip devices and by reducing the accidents
and falling issues [7].
Gunvor Gard and Glenn Lundborg worked collectively to evaluate the five different types of Swedish anti-skid
devices on the slippery surfaces [8].
The interest of research was to determine the preventive strategies in the
winter season to reduce the rate of fall and slips on the road ways and
slippery pavements. In the Swedish market there are three different types of
anti-slip devices such as whole foot device, fore foot device, and heel devices
and analysis of these devices were carried out on the slippery surfaces, salt,
snow, ice, sand and gravel surfaces [8].
The evaluation were recorded
for walking movement the walking posters and time of taking off the skid
devices. Different surfaces was selected in the city of Northern Sweden. The
research determined function of normal muscle, knee, and hip joints while
wearing the anti-skid devices on all the surfaces [8]. The small deviation
in the walking gait can result in the larger embellishment. All the analysis
were recorded but there was no Systematic difference in all devices. The
analysis perceive that fix heel devices work more efficiently. The safety
measures were considered while working on slippery devices with different
footwear [8].
In the previous research [9]
classified five different types of footwear on the basis of slip resistance on
the dry ice and the wet ice. The prototype apparatus why used to determine the
coefficient of kinetic friction for the actual foot slipping and surface
temperature of the smooth ice. The fundamental mechanism used in the present
study was the determination of friction of the polymers on the ice [9]. The physical and
chemical properties of the ice have greatest influence on the coefficient of
friction and slip resistance. According to the analysis of these five different
types of footwear no one was slip resistant on both dry ice and wet ice [9]. Researchers
extracted the results ensure that the shoes made up of thermoplastic rubber and
soft heel are more recommendable to use in winters for the dry ice. In case of wet ice the hard solid material
along with the sharp cleats was recommended. The strewing sand on the ice
increased the slip resistance up to the level of safe zone and it was
recommended for the wet ice [9].
In winter season of Nordic
countries approximately 100,000 pedestrians receives medical treatment due to
falls on slippery surfaces [10]. The risk of injuries can be reduced by having
appropriate method alternative to move in the winter season. The slip accidents
on the snowy roads occurs due to loss of balance and as a consequence the
injury causes pain. There are different types of countermeasures that can
reduce the risk of slipping and sliding on the Icy roads [10]. One of the critical phase in the human gait is the
heel strike and toe off. The countermeasures includes use of different
equipment’s, winter footwear, anti-skid devices, road grippers, and fastened
shoes. There is search addresses different issues and prevention processes of
injuries by use of anti-slip devices [10].
The analysis includes 33
different types of anti-slip devices. The test simulates winter maintenance
standards on the snow, ice, gravel, salt, and pure ice. The analysis recorded
exposure general expression and walking balance for anti-slip devices [10]. The frictional measurements were carried out in the Finnish
institute of occupational health (FIOH). In the research four different types
of anti-slip devices and 10 subjects were considered. In the research four
ratings were developed for the walking movement conditions and for the inner
rate reliability [10]. The conditions of movements and walking posture
included normal muscle function in the knees and hips and two specialist and
therapist fitted the agreement at 85%, the movement and walking posture for the
whole body including arms, shoulders, and health was 80% agreement. The toe off
agreement was 85% and the heel strike agreement was 86% [10].
The anti-slip devices
improves the walking safety and walking balance and indicates capacity of
promoted normal walking style. As three devices were considered and all the
devices work compatible with the consideration. The heel device perceived more
consideration due to stable and fit shoes. The toe device was portable as well
as stable for the uncovered ice [10]. The whole device was comfortable for the walking
process and it was safe to use this device in the snow covered ice areas. The
hell device was ranked at the highest vision with respect to the uncovered Ice
walking balance, walking safety in snow covered roads, and working balance and
personal use of the users. In order to determine the effect of anti-slip
devices 18 subjects were considered [10].
The study defined increasing
rate of anti-slip devices. The walking speed of each participant was also
considered and weight of participants were considered for nonhomogeneous
groups. The effect of walking on the performance and working of the task was
considered for the slips and flip falls [10]. The parameters of anti-slip devices are based on the
coefficient of kinetic friction, required coefficient of friction, surrounding
temperature, and weight of the user. The fall and slip accident increases due
to increase in the required coefficient of friction and measured coefficient of
friction [10].
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83de5/83de528741f832e198f3634ee8da4a4db3763c62" alt=""
References of Smart Footwear for Wintry Conditions
[5]
|
J. Hsu, R. Shaw, A.
Novak and Y. Li, "Slip resistance of winter footwear on snow and ice
measured using maximum achievable incline," Ergonomics, vol. 59,
no. 05, pp. 717-728, 2016.
|
[6]
|
G. Gard and G.
Berggård, "Assessment of anti-slip devices from healthy individuals in
different ages walking on slippery surfaces," Applied Ergonomics, vol.
37, no. 02, pp. 177-186, 2006.
|
[7]
|
G. Berggård,
"Anti-Slip Devices to prevent pedestrians from slipping and falling
during wintertime," 21st ICTCT workshop, vol. 03, no. 05, pp.
01-10, 2008.
|
[8]
|
Gunvor, Lundborg,
Glenn, "Test of Swedish anti-skid devices on five different slippery
surfaces," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 33, no. 01,
pp. 1-8, 2001.
|
[9]
|
R. Grönqvist and M.
Hirvonen, "Slipperiness of footwear and mechanisms of walking friction
on icy surfaces," International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol.
16, no. 03, pp. 191-200, 1995.
|
[10]
|
G. Berggård, Method
development and practical test, vol. 01, no. 05, pp. 01-15, 2010.
|
|
|