In England laws and politics
normally looks to be in uncertain state. In many different matters, the
political approach contradicts with laws. The best example of this
contradiction is the election of 2010, which was held in great conflict between
the human rights charters and political practice. Another example of law and
political conflict is, parliament of England in 2005 has put all their energies
to completely withdraw or minimize the powers and authorities given to the
public representatives at lower levels. [7] .
Recent proceedings show great conflicts and contradictions in the human
rights protection and laws. (The Human Rights Act 1998), the decentralization
of the authorities (the Scotland Act 1998, Government of Wales Acts 1998 and
2006, and Northern Ireland Act 1998),
Additionally, it is noted that
with the passage of time the courts has changed and develop themselves by
taking decisions. Courts have taken responsibility to review their decisions,
as there are some flaws in decision-making. Judicial powers are not limited but
have edge as it controls the execution powers. Judges have responsibility to
execute the decisions and the life has strong impression with these decisions. Executive
actions are used to declare the decisions and powers to resolve the issues.
Judicial powers make the judiciary supreme and control all the authority. In
this modern period, in the light of the senior lawmakers views it is state that
parliament has the sovereign powers. Sovereignty means ultimate power and has
supremacy over all the legal authorities. Parliamentary sovereignty means have
complete authority for making and changing laws. It is the common law of rule
that someone have sovereign power in a country to rule and control the powers.
It is most important that judiciary must have interpretation or abandonment.
Interpretation of legal decisions by judiciary holds the judicial review. Since
the terrorist attacks in September 11, 2001 and July 7, 2005, the judiciary has
been taken more serious and strict actions to resolves the political issues.
Judiciary enforces the Human Rights Act, 1998. The common people have right to
education, freedom, right to speaking and taking part in political activities.
Judiciary has responsibility to enforce the legal civil rights of common
people. Human Right Act 1998 provides the guaranty to people to do practices
under the legal rights. Judiciary concerns with the national security and it
hold the powers to organize or control the law. Judiciary holds the rights and
religious groups controlled by using the legal powers.
References of Legal constitutional Problems in UK
| |
[7]
|
N. Morris, "UK
have a written constitution, and does it matter?," 14 February 2008.
[Online]. Available: UK have a written constitution, and does it matter?.
|