This paper is about analysis of delays in
loan processing times in the Emporia Mortgage Company (EMC) by using statistical
process control method to find out the problems lied under the long mortgage
processing times. The Emporia Mortgage Company (EMC) is a medium-sized mortgage
lender and it expanded its mortgage refinancing and home remodeling credit
operations to two shifts. This rapid expansion to a full two-shift operation,
the pressure to produce higher volumes, and the push to meet requests from
high-profit customers were suspected to be the major causes of the breakdown in
their quality.
According to the description of the
company, the company passed the economic downturn in the mortgage lending
industry because of its clients and well-trained employees. Because of its
dedicated employees, the company was well-known for its completion time for
loan process which took only around 2-3 work days. After the expansion of its
business in mortgage refinancing and home remodeling credit operations, the
problems and complaints arose in loan processing time. The reason why these
problems happened would be the requirement of a lot of additional workers and
extra working hours to meet the customers’ demand for the expansion. Although
the company hired additional workers and increased working hours, there were
delays in loan processing times because of the inefficient and inexperience new
employees. To find out whether the company is facing a serious problem or not,
analysis on each loan worker’s processing time using statistical process
control methods becomes necessary.
The results from the following analysis
show that there are assignable causes in processing which are necessary to
identify and eliminate to improve the processing times. The company might
eliminate these problems by discussing the employees in group, providing them
an intensive training or reducing working hours.
The analysis is done by the application
of various techniques in statistical process control methods. These include
variables control charts, evaluation of the process capability and the fraction
of nonconforming. In this case, x-bar and range (R) will be used as variables
control charts as the sample size (n=5) is less than 10.
Analysis
Firstly, 30 sample data consisting of
five observations (n) are selected randomly from the 100 days’ data collected
for all shift to construct x-bar and range charts by using Excel formula.
Table 1.1 Calculation of x-bar and range (R)
Sample
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
x-bar
|
Range (R)
|
1
|
14.02
|
14.51
|
15.50
|
14.14
|
15.24
|
14.68
|
1.48
|
2
|
15.74
|
18.08
|
13.73
|
21.82
|
12.13
|
16.30
|
9.69
|
3
|
20.40
|
22.21
|
16.94
|
29.32
|
21.30
|
22.03
|
12.38
|
4
|
12.90
|
11.94
|
16.27
|
13.41
|
20.79
|
15.06
|
8.85
|
5
|
20.90
|
14.04
|
17.05
|
19.26
|
15.93
|
17.44
|
6.86
|
6
|
13.55
|
18.32
|
18.64
|
12.83
|
12.81
|
15.23
|
5.83
|
7
|
16.60
|
12.41
|
13.88
|
12.90
|
17.68
|
14.69
|
5.27
|
8
|
19.17
|
13.31
|
14.49
|
13.41
|
14.00
|
14.88
|
5.86
|
9
|
19.91
|
15.53
|
16.27
|
14.13
|
16.56
|
16.48
|
5.78
|
10
|
13.31
|
14.49
|
13.41
|
14.00
|
20.93
|
15.23
|
7.62
|
11
|
15.86
|
13.53
|
9.42
|
18.04
|
11.87
|
13.74
|
8.62
|
12
|
19.00
|
12.87
|
14.74
|
14.96
|
15.55
|
15.42
|
6.13
|
13
|
21.90
|
22.43
|
23.59
|
19.58
|
18.56
|
21.21
|
5.03
|
14
|
17.05
|
17.51
|
14.47
|
16.25
|
17.05
|
16.47
|
3.04
|
15
|
15.93
|
10.11
|
13.88
|
17.33
|
14.47
|
14.34
|
7.22
|
16
|
16.58
|
12.99
|
11.60
|
13.31
|
17.46
|
14.39
|
5.86
|
17
|
15.17
|
15.65
|
13.80
|
17.78
|
15.75
|
15.63
|
3.98
|
18
|
15.27
|
13.28
|
23.87
|
9.83
|
15.12
|
15.47
|
14.04
|
19
|
13.01
|
24.15
|
18.93
|
18.72
|
10.77
|
17.12
|
13.38
|
20
|
16.32
|
14.97
|
16.46
|
17.53
|
15.62
|
16.18
|
2.56
|
21
|
16.88
|
19.36
|
15.88
|
15.87
|
14.26
|
16.45
|
5.10
|
22
|
17.560
|
3.56
|
19.62
|
16.89
|
6.84
|
12.89
|
16.06
|
23
|
12.760
|
12.17
|
16.05
|
14.59
|
15.76
|
14.27
|
3.88
|
24
|
16.350
|
12.59
|
18.38
|
20.67
|
14.91
|
16.58
|
8.08
|
25
|
12.650
|
12.24
|
16.77
|
14.91
|
18.29
|
14.97
|
6.05
|
26
|
21.040
|
14.16
|
17.06
|
22.43
|
17.69
|
18.48
|
8.27
|
27
|
20.650
|
14.34
|
17.55
|
20.76
|
13.43
|
17.35
|
7.33
|
28
|
23.340
|
14.56
|
14.97
|
20.60
|
11.38
|
16.97
|
11.96
|
29
|
13.300
|
18.62
|
19.14
|
14.33
|
10.31
|
15.14
|
8.83
|
30
|
15.100
|
7.11
|
10.45
|
15.59
|
11.90
|
12.03
|
8.48
|
Sum
|
477.12
|
223.52
|
Table 1.1 shows the calculation of x-bar
and range (R).
In Figure 1.2, one point (number 22) is above the
upper control limit while others lie within the control limits. Therefore, there
are out-of-control signals on both charts which indicate the process is out of
control.
Conclusion of Analysis of Delays in Loan
Processing in Emporia Mortgage Company Using Statistical Process Control Method
The initial control charts, which are
x-bar chart and range chart, show that the process is out of control and there might
be an assignable cause which is needed to identify and eliminate. Also, the
process capability indexes show us that the process is not capable of meeting
the nominal specification. We can conclude that the quality of the company’s
processing operation does not meet the company’s specification for its
customers. Therefore, I think EMC is facing a serious problem that it needs to
address. I would recommend the company that reducing some of the shifts and
providing the employees effective training would be a solution to eliminate the
problems of slow loan processing. It seems like additional employees hired for
expansion don’t have enough experience to perform their jobs well. In addition,
increasing working hours and the pressures to produce higher volumes make them
unable to meet the company nominal specification. Standardizing the working
procedures, discussing in group meetings and providing intensive trainings would
be the best solutions for the company to eliminate the slow processing times.