The photovoltaic system is an
energy generating system that works on the similar principle of solar panels.
The energy system in the photovoltaics takes input energy from the sun and then
converts it into the electricity. The system have many advantages in industry
and domestic use such as safe, low maintenance, reliable, and green energy
system. The photovoltaic system contributes to the green environment and
provides sustainable energy. The photovoltaic system can be divided into two
main categories including off grid systems and grid connected. The grid system
is more reliable for the local energy generation and distribution in the remote
locations. The elements of the system functions efficiently according to the
processes (Blair, Dobos, Freeman, Neises, & Wagner, 2014).
Problem statement of
Photovoltaic system
The present work considers the
performance for the renewable energy system and analysis of photovoltaic
system. The simulation model is designed by System Advisor Model (SAM) for the
photovoltaic system. The model consists of three modules and two inverters. The
system integrated in the project measures the performance and cost for the
financial model. The renewable energy system was developed to meet the demands on
the basis of given data and available equipment. In the day timing the solar
system will produce power by PV panels and power is transferred to the OGZEB to
meet the demands of energy. While on the other hand in the night time the PV
panels will use the produced energy. The present report comprises of two
objectives including PV system design and how it works and minimization of the
cost required to develop the PV system.
Available data of Photovoltaic system
The construction plan depend on the
budget and area to be covered in the project. The roof area is 98.1 m2
and it is facing towards south. The inclination angle of the roof is 300
inclined. The PV system will work in the day time and batteries are
sufficiently enough to deliver the required and cheap energy (Blair & Dobos, 2013). The maximum
capacity of the batteries will be reduced after sometime. The better should be
replaced when the capacity reduces to 20 %. The building characteristics
matters for the proper functionality of design and the entire house operates at
60 Hz, 120 V and power factor of 1 (Cameron, Boyson, & Riley, 2008). The performance
rate for the PV design is adjusted to 0.25% and the losses in diodes can be
0.5% and losses in the wiring system will be 1%. The soiling of the panels and
capacity reaches to 4%. The shadow casted next to the building will be 10%. The
PV modules are $7.21/W, batteries costs $180 kWhr, and labor rate is $30/hr (Cameron, Boyson, & Riley, 2008). The direct expanses
reduces to 10% and the installer is provided with the maintenance services at
the fixed rate of $100/year. The expected lifetime of the system is 25 years (Blair, et al., 2017).
Design model of
Photovoltaic system
The SAM model considers weather
conditions for the renewable energy resource. The SAM based model provides
graphs, tables, and displays the metric tables for the leveled cost of energy.
The single value metric tables and graphs are provided for the performance
analysis (Blair N. , Dobos, Freeman, Neises, & Wagner, 2014). The auto run
simulation provides customized graphs for the performance. The performance
model of SAM measured hour by hour calculations for the annual system output
and general performance evaluation (Cameron, Boyson, & Riley, 2008). The flat plate PV
model provided separate models and the layout of the system considered
concentrating PV model as CPV. The solar resource data was measured by the
incident radiations and algorithms. The Photovoltaic model used inputs for the
conversion efficiency, capacity and inverter performance characteristics (Cameron, Boyson, & Riley, 2008). The model considers
ambient temperature data, wind speed, and effect of the temperature on the
working of the PV cells. The photovoltaic system consists of concentrating
photovoltaic and flat plate photovoltaic system. The series model for the
hourly generation of the energy is measured and figure 1 depicts the storage
system for the Photovoltaic system (Blair N. , Dobos, Freeman, Neises, & Wagner, 2014). The SAM model uses
interface, programing interface and calculation engine. The input variables
were provided to control the graphs and results. The input variables describes
the physical characteristics for the basic simulation (Blair & Dobos, 2013). The output
variables provides results in form of graphs and tables. The programming worked
as external program to measure the computation model (Blair N. , Dobos, Freeman, Neises, & Wagner, 2014).
Figure
1:
the series time graph for the hourly generation of electricity (Blair N. , Dobos, Freeman, Neises, & Wagner,
2014)
Financial model of Photovoltaic system
The financial model of SAM
considered various types of the powers as related to the cash flows and
specified for the electrical output in the series of the of cash flows. The SAM
financial model included sales leaseback, all equity partnership flip,
leveraged partnership, and utility scale for residential and commercial retail
rates. The model of SAM measures levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for the cash
flow, revenue cash flow, and internal rate of the return (Blair N. , Dobos, Freeman, Neises, & Wagner, 2014).
Conclusion of Photovoltaic
system
The present was related to the
implementation of SAM model for the photovoltaic system. The report includes
installation cost, labor, land cost, project cost and maintenance cost. The
number of inverters and modules, derating factors and tracking type is
considered for the photovoltaic system. The type of collector and receiver
provides information about the power block capacity, storage capacity, and
parabolic systems. The analysis measures real discount rate, tax rates, power
purchase prices, and financing models.
References of Photovoltaic
system
Blair, N. J., & Dobos, A. P. (2013). Comparison
of Photovoltaic Models in the System Advisor Model. Retrieved from
www.nrel.gov: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/58057.pdf
Blair, N., DiOrio, N., Freeman, J., Gilman, P.,
Janzou, S., & Neises, T. (2017). System Advisor Model (SAM) General
Description. Retrieved from www.nrel.gov:
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70414.pdf
Blair, N., Dobos, A. P., Freeman, J., Neises, T.,
& Wagner, M. (2014, 02 01). System Advisor Model, SAM 2014.1.14: General
Description. Retrieved from www.nrel.gov:
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/61019.pdf
Cameron, C. P., Boyson, W. E., & Riley, D. M.
(2008). COMPARISON OF PV SYSTEM PERFORMANCE-MODEL PREDICTIONS WITH MEASURED PV
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. 33rd IEEE PVSC, 01(01), 01-06.