The
Circular Economy force the greatest value from the effectiveness and efficiency
factors at the same time as in use, then regenerate and recover materials and
products at the each service life end. The economy efficiency means minimizing
the toxicity and volume of materials flow that can be disposing. The circular economy effectiveness is said
to be the best method to do a particular practice. The three strategies to force the changeover to
the new economy of plastics are also contributing towards the
optimization of the plastic production and consumption in the future. There is
assumption that the “Total oil consumption expected to grow
slower (0.5% p.a.) than plastics
production (3.8% until
2030 then 3.5%
to 2050)” that is also valid according to the current
initiatives of the governments and countries as far as oil consumption and
plastic production is concern.
Introduction
of The Circular Economy
The
circular Economy is a substitute to a customary linear economy that is (make, use,
dispose) in that all of the resources utilize for long time, so that the
production and depose of these material can be reduce. The circular Economy
also extort the utmost value from them at the same time as
in use, then regenerate and recover materials and products at the each service
life end. In this paper there is discussion about the difference between the efficiency and
effectiveness for the
circular economy, three strategies
to force the changeover to
new economy of plastics and the analyzing an assumption given about
the circular Economy. For
the circular economy effectiveness the best method to do a particular practice
weather it is about using the right material or recycling in a best and most
influential way possible [1].
1. Briefly
summarize the building blocks
and the difference
between efficiency and
effectiveness for the
circular economy. 250
The economy efficiency means minimizing the toxicity and volume
of materials flow that can be dispose. It is quite obvious that we create products,
use them (typically not for long time) and at the end disposes them of in the
environment. If we introduce economy efficiency, then there is the possibility
that the reduction in the amount of material that people purchase and try to
dispose in best possible way that would be more sustainable for environment.
Sometimes it is good to recycle, although frequently the material that is recycled
will just be helpful for a partial uses — it will also be of lower excellence
than the first hand material [2].
It can be said that
this efficiency of economy is certainly better than not doing anything about it.
It is true that it doesn’t deal with fundamental ‘cradle-to-grave’ system nature—
the reality that all products are created (cradle) and eventually end up in
waste (grave). The effectiveness of
the resource and the circular economy are critical for potential better international
prosperity [3]. Some of the initiatives
and projects about country are investigative how resource effectiveness and
circularity introduced in a range of sectors. After the economy efficiency the
effectiveness means to do something in best way that have the maximum
influence. For the circular economy effectiveness the best method to do a
particular practice weather it is about using the right material or recycling in
a best and most influential way possible.
2. Using the
2017 report, describe
the three strategies
to drive the
transition to the
new plastics economy.
250
According to 2017 report, three
strategies to force
the changeover to
new plastics economy are as follow [4]:
·
“Without Fundamental
Redesign and Innovation,
about 30% of
Plastic Packaging Will Never Be
Reused or Recycled (Ellen Macarthur Foundation, 2017, p. 17)”
According
to this strategy about half of items using
packaging of the plastic and about
30 percent of whole market
, consists of 4 section:
multi-material packaging;
nutrient- contaminated small-format packaging; and uncommon plastic
packaging materials; packaging .
While frequently providing high functions, all of this types of packaging
not have feasible
recycling or reuse
path and are not
likely to have
one at balance
in predictable future [1].
·
“For at
least 20% of
plastic packaging, reuse
provides an economically
attractive opportunity (Ellen Macarthur
Foundation, 2017, p. 17)”
The packaging
of plastic opportunities of reuse quantified and identified in
this modernize report correspond to at
least 20 percent of
market, by weight.
For examples the home care and personal carrier
bags and bottles
could manufacture about six million tonnes of substance investments
and also a chance of the economy by 9
billion $ [2].
·
“With concerted
efforts on design
and after-use systems,
recycling would be
economically attractive for
the remaining 50%
of plastic packaging (Ellen Macarthur
Foundation, 2017, p. 18)”
This net
cost estimation exclude
the extra societal
and environmental reimbursement
of recycling plastics
for example: reduced gas
emissions of greenhouse ; concentrated
impacts on environment on ground
use, air quality and
biodiversity ; and creation
of job .
For instance, 1
tonne plastic gathered for
purpose of recycling avoids production
of an predictable
1 tonne of
carbon dioxide that is equal to the greenhouse
gas measure up to the
mix of incineration
and landfill with recovery
of the energy [4] .
3. Describe
any assumptions made and
any disclaimers. Are the assumptions valid
or how would
these be tested?
“Total oil consumption expected to
grow slower (0.5%
p.a.) than plastics
production (3.8% until
2030 then 3.5%
to 2050) (Ellen Macarthur Foundation,
2016, p. 29)”
Above
is the assumption about the oil consumptions and plastic production in the
future. I think this assumption is quite valid depending on the present
consumption of oil and plastic production. In the future it is expected that the overall
consumption of the oil and plastic production would reduce, although the figure
cannot be estimated. I think this assumption is not partially valid because
after 2030, the production of plastic would expected to reduce more than it is
mention, as currently many of the companies and government looking for the more
sustainabile alternatives of the plastic [1].
Conclusion
of The Circular Economy
Summing
up the discussion it can be said that the economy efficiency also lead towards
possibility that the reduction in the amount of material that people purchase
and try to dispose in best possible way
that would be more sustainable for
environment. The effectiveness of the
resource and the circular economy are critical for potential better
international prosperity. Plastic
opportunities of reuse quantified
and identified in
this modernize report correspond to at
least 20 percent of
market. In the future it is expected that the overall consumption of the
oil and plastic production would reduce, although the figure cannot be
estimated
References
of The Circular Economy
[1]
|
Ellen Macarthur
Foundation, "THE NEW PLASTICS ECONOMY CATALYSING ACTION," Ellen
Macarthur Foundation, UK, 2017.
|
[2]
|
Ellen Macarthur
Foundation, "THE NEW PLASTICS ECONOMY RETHINKING THE FUTURE OF
PLASTICS," Ellen Macarthur Foundation, UK, 2016.
|
[3]
|
Ellenmacarthurfoundation.org,
"Efficiency vs Effectiveness," 9 OCTOBER 2012. [Online]. Available:
https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/news/efficiency-vs-effectiveness.
|
[4]
|
J. Nordling,
"Resource Effectiveness and the Circular Economy," 26 March 2018.
[Online]. Available: https://www.iva.se/en/projects/resource-effectiveness-and-the-circular-economy.
|