Colombia is located
in Latin America; it was one of the most peaceful countries of the region. It
was greatly stable and stood out because of its competitive bipartisan
democracy. It was found that among South American countries Colombia was the
only country without any military intervention in the Great Depression of 1930.
This declaration was done through critical test for political stability.
Argentina was having a stable democracy as well which was then interrupted by
an army coup. In Brazil, was first modern dictatorship was established by
Getulio Vargas while fair elections took place in Colombia. The dominating
ruling party lost the election but gave over the power to winning part which
was opposition, without creating any issue. Somehow, there was lack of peace in
Colombia but still that era is marked as peaceful political milestone in
history of Colombia. 19th period in Colombian history is the era of chaos, even
by the standards of Hispanic Americans. This chaotic era includes 9 civil wars,
several local rebellions and mutinies, destruction of material which ruined
several years of economic output, almost 250,000 people died because of
political violence.
Colombian land is
rich in naturally existing resources and the culture reflects the native Spanish,
African and Indian origination of its people. But the land is greatly
destructed with several decade long brutal conflicts which involved illegal
armed groups, carters of drugs and utter violation of basic rights of human
beings. From 2002, the Colombia did some distinctive works towards improvement
of its security. In South America, Colombia is known as 4th largest country and
it is among the most popular nations. Colombia is rich as it has its own oil
supply, and is main producer of platinum, gold, silver, emeralds and coal.
Colombian society is a stratified society, the Spanish descend who are rich
enjoyed all the liabilities as being traditional rich families more than mixed
race people, which provided a constituency for the left wing insurgents [1].
Timeline of
Columbia
1525: Beginning of
efforts of Spain to conquest Colombia.
1819: at Boyacá,
Spanish were defeated by Simon Bolivar. The Republic of Gran Colombia was
formed, which is now comprised of Panama, Ecuador and Venezuela.
1829-30: Venezuela
and Ecuador separated when Gran Colombia was dissolved, which resulted in two
separate nations which are now known as Nueva Granada and comprises of Colombia
and Panama.
1848-90: Liberal
and Conservative parties came to surface in these years who were rivals. The
rival conflicts of both the parties dominated Colombian politics in this time.
1899-1902:
Approximately, 120,000 people died in “The War of the Thousand Days”, which was
the civil war of Liberal and Conservative parties. Panama became an independent
state.
1948-57: “La
Violencia”, the Civil war between Liberals and Conservatives caused death of
250,000- 300,000 people. The war ended upon National Front Coalition formation.
1964-71: M-19, Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Maoist People’s Liberation Army (EPL) and Left
National Liberation Army (ELN) emerged together as left wing Guerilla groups.
1998-99: Initiation
of pace negotiations between government and FARC. In south east of Colombia,
safe haven was granted in order to help peace talks.
2002: FARC hijacked
an aircraft which broke down the peace talks and up rise of violence takes
place. An independent candidate Alvaro Uribe won the Presidential election and
promised to rain down hell on rebels.
2016: 52 years
conflict comes to an end when government and FARC sign a paper to maintain
peace. A new agreement comes to surface when voters reject the deal present in
national referendum.
Government System of
Colombia
The Colombian
government is republic and the power is distributed among executives, judicial
and legislatives branches. President is the part of executive branch, Supreme
Court is the part of judicial branch and Congress is the part of Legislative
branch. Colombian citizens cast votes to elect their government and an office
is employed for inspector o look after the public affairs in private sector.
Such working development in country protects public rights, and human rights as
stated in Constitution of 1991. The constitution and protection of everyone’s
rights provide a framework for state’s welfare and form a united republican
state.
Government and
public officers work together with each other under the name “Control
institutions” to bring out better results for state of Colombia. For example;
Public general inspector works in close collaboration with Government
controller general, who is in charge of governmental fiscal responsibility. An
Independent Ombudsman in Colombia is responsible to deal with maladministration
complaints and functions [2].
Executive Branch of
Colombia
The President of
Republic has power to deal with executive branch of Colombia. The head of
executive is supported by Vice President, the Council of Ministers and
Administrative Departments of Colombia. All the policies of Colombia are
created by government of Colombia; the governors of different Departments of
Colombia are elected through votes. This voting system represents President and
executive branch of Government of Columbia. In order to maximize the
representation, mayors are subordinated to governors. Governors are the maximum
representative of executive branch at municipal level. Regional elections allow
the selection of mayors and governors of department via votes [3].
Legislative of
Columbia and its Government System
The legislative
branch of Colombia has responsibility or making laws in the country. People
have power to elect the representatives in order to support their political and
general thoughts in government.
Judiciary of
Columbia and its Government System
The judiciary of
Colombia is a branch of Colombia which is also known as Rama Judicial de
Colombia. This branch coins the laws for the state of Colombia in order to
ensure that equal justice is being served in all the states, and to provide a
mechanism upon which decisions will be taken and justice will be served. The
judiciary system has hierarchy system which means that courts of Colombia
comprises of judges, magistrates and adjudicators.
Except for the
special indigenous jurisdictions there is only one jurisdiction in centralized
state such as Colombia. This jurisdiction is further divided into ordinary,
penal, administrative, constitutional, disciplinary and special jurisdiction
(military, peace and indigenous matters) on the basis of functions these bodies
perform [4].
Local Government
Structure of Columbia
According to
Constitution of 1991, the local government of Colombia has two tier systems.
The higher level of this local government comprises of total 32 departments and
a Capital district, Bogotá which has its own position and provide powers to
government just as other departments. The second level of tier is composed of
1101 municipalities which include five special districts because of their
significant cultural, historical, commercial, environmental, political and
commercial characteristics along with important constituents which provide
certain privileges with respect to new sovereignty presented in 2013.
Constitution of 1991 provides special position for certain regions; 817 native
regions, homes for 1.4 million residents along with 6 modern areas which are
legislated region jurisdictions.
Over the past three
decade, Colombia has gone through rapid changes which are connected to
decentralization reforms. In 1986, the process of decentralization began, which
was strengthen by the Constitution of 1991. The LOOT law of 2011 clarified the
rules of decentralization, competency distribution across the levels of
government of Colombia remain complex. The majority of competencies are
distributed among binary system of decentralization and designated
responsibilities. The competencies are distributed among all the levels of
government of Colombia i.e. health, education, housing, water and sewage. All
the departments are responsible for sale and promotion of products of their
concerned department in order to develop social and economic values of the
region. They practice functions of administration of coordination and
intermediation with the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for
give services like electricity, transport, cadaster, local planning system and
municipal police. These sectors are certified and non-certified for certain
capacities such as health, water, education and sanitation. [5]
Changing and
Enduring Political Patterns
Political history
of Colombia is divided into two blocks of time. i.e. 1860 and 1930. The 1860 is
known as Radical Olympus while 1930 is known as Conservative Hegemony; both the
eras were dominated by two political parties, each with different policies.
Liberals were in power during Olympus Radical which was from 1860-80s. In order
to remove Colombia’s heavy colonial patrimony frantic institutional
improvements were designed by the faction known as “Radical” [6].
In another outlook
which was not based upon party or differences of policies but on the basis of
political conflict. The period 1850 to 1950 can be divided into two sections of
time, the first block comprises of time prior 1905 which is remembered as
interparty warfare and the second part is known as peaceful sharing of power.
It implies the division of the Conservative Hegemony which is viewed as the
same period. After 1905, emergences of political orders were due to efforts of
political parties. The same political parties were responsible for the chaos
created in political history and destruction of material prior to that date.
Till the beginning
of 20th century both the political parties i.e. Liberal party and Conservative
party were electorate as well as part military organizations with the
fluctuations of proportion over time. The superiority of military is the main
reason to access and have charge over government. In order to come out of chaos
in Colombia replacement of military fronts was required which was achieved with
electoral conditions which is a common practice of interplay relations, was
caused by electoral system [7].
Proportional
Representation of Colombian Transition
Two main reforms
were required to change majoritarian to equal electoral institutions in
Colombia, they separation was about a quarter century apart. Due to incomplete
voting the majoritarian rule was replaced in 1905. Which clarified that the
winning party will get 2/3 seats while the runner ups will be allocated with
1/3 seats, and this has nothing to do with the percentages of the votes. In
1929, the Quotient rule, precisely known as a standard version of PR replaced
the incomplete voting. Ever since, elections in Colombia relay upon
proportional representation.
The extended,
albeit intermittent and negotiation process that took place between Liberal and
Conservative parties caused incomplete votes and quotient rule. The rectifications
were introduced when Conservative party was in government and during the
remaining half of the Conservative Hegemony. The electoral reform is
unexplainable through incomplete voting of 1905 and replacements of incomplete
voting by PR in 1929 most variations are pioneered in account of Stein Rokkan’s
Scandinavian cases. In Rokkan’s perspective, the rectification of majoritarian
rule when Conservative party was in charge shows that social reformation and
modernization and the rise of Left parties the minority force would be
Conservatives and it is better if the Conservatives are represented as it in
political arena in this way their future position will be present in certain
proportion rather than majority representations rule [8].
In objection with
Rokkan’s perspective of withdrawal of Conservative party, both reforms were
introduced in politics right when were expected by Conservative party.
Intentionally or unintentionally, with thought that their position and majority
rule will remain as it is without any challenge. Moreover, both Colombian
parties thought that under majoritarian rule Conservative share of legislative
seats would be greater than any other voted institutions; it also includes
incomplete vote and quotient rule.
Thereby, electoral
rectification has to decline rather than incline the future power of
institutions that are affiliated to government. Another contrast with Rokkan’s illustration
over Scandinavian process is that the improvement in elections was natural,
unplanned and one sided decision of the party in charge. Conservation
government made a concession with Liberal party by incomplete vote and quotient
rule of Colombia. This recommended electoral changes for several years and
bought benefit to in context of legislative seats [9].
Conclusion of
Columbia and its Government System
It is concluded
that findings of Colombian changed from majoritarian rule to representation in
certain proportions in association with present literature or the electoral
history of Colombia. It is also assessed that share of power in first part of
20th century and flare up of violence in other half of general abstract lessons
were provided, regarding to origination of rule through voting and exploration of their use
to other cases of Latin America.
References of
Columbia and its Government System
[1]
|
BBC,
"Colombia country profile," 8 August 2018. [Online].
|
[2]
|
C. Hand,
Colombia, ABDO Publishing Company, 2013.
|
[3]
|
L. Lim and M. W.
Apple, The Strong State and Curriculum Reform: Assessing the politics and
possibilities of educational change in Asia, Routledge, 2016.
|
[4]
|
T. Streissguth,
Colombia in Pictures, Twenty-First Century Books, 2004.
|
[5]
|
B. C. Smith,
Judges and Democratization: Judicial Independence in New Democracies, Taylor
& Francis, 2017.
|
[6]
|
A. Alesina,
Institutional Reforms: The Case of Colombia, MIT Press, 2005.
|
[7]
|
A. Steele,
"Electing Displacement: Political Cleansing in Apartadó,
Colombia.," Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 423-445,
2011.
|
[8]
|
M. Albertus and
V. Menaldo, Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy, Cambridge
University Press, 2018.
|
[9]
|
S. Mazzuca and J.
A. Robinson, "Political conflict and power sharing in the origins of
modern Colombia," Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 89, no. 2,
pp. 285-321, 2009.
|