In this paper, there is the discussion on the change
management and there is focus on the support to bring about a positive change
through effective leadership. However, in the paper there is the discussion
that how people can be motivated. In the paper, there is the focus on
the change management and discussion on the Gosfield park management team
and their leadership styles. The team management situational leadership
theories are concerned in the paper and Gosfield park
management team skills are noticed that how team is effectively
responding to the change management. The directive and autocratic
leadership is used by the team under the proficient and progressive
atmosphere. In the report, there is also focus on the hersey and
Blanchard working environment that how employees are provided with
the high support. Under coaching leadership, the Gosfield Park’s
management team is developed. There are also some suggestion and discussion for
the team through that how managing practices can be noticed by 7 s
model of mckinsey.
Define change management and leadership
Change management is the process, tools and techniques that
are used by a business to manage its employees and achieve desired and
productive prospects for their organization. It is the systematic approach
applied by successful organizations for managing their employees and providing
them with apt skills, knowledge and support to bring about a positive change. [1]. Leadership is the
way of leading that motivates a group of people who look up to a certain leader
for achieving their goals and objectives. Good leadership applies such strategies
that help employees to meet the requirements of their organization. Leadership
traits are more effective then management as it inspires, supervises and
communicates with the employees of the organization. [2].Change management and leadership are interrelated as
leadership is very important for bringing and coordinating with change in an
organization. The change and development can only be engaged in an organization
by potential leadership. Good leadership comprises of inspiring their followers
to accept different cultural expectations good for an organization. Change
management and leadership together can bring great changes to any business. It
is an approach that can develop the current state of an individual or
organization in to the required condition that is desired for an organization
by its effective leadership. It empowers employees so that they can accept the
positive change.
Change management is the means of bringing change by a
systematic process for transitioning people to work hard and accept the change
brought forward in innovative technologies and values as a competitive tactic.
Change managers develop messages that have to be communicated to the employees
for building stronger coalitions between the different levels of management. [3]
Concepts of leadership and change management
There are several concepts of leadership and change
management, however, a democratic style of a leader focus on the delegating
authority and encouraging participation. However, in the autocratic style of a
leader, there is focus on the centralizing decision and there is also the limitations
in the participation by the leader. In the transactional leadership; there is
focus on using the social exchanges. However, in the visionary leadership; the
leader is realistic credible and focus on the future. For the change management
it is analyzed that a leader need to be democratic and visionary so that there
could be better development involvement of the group and better steps can be
taken for future.
Objectives of change management and leadership
Change management with effective leadership is very
important for any organization because it is the beginning for a productive
achievement. The objectives behind change are to bring about innovation that is
healthy for any business. It may seem a little difficult but urgency is the
key, think about the better end product to increase optimism in the workers. Change
management leaders focuses on the employee side of change to ensure that
changes made in job roles, technologies and organizational structures are
efficiently met.
Gosfield Park Management Team & their Leadership Styles
Q1. Hersey and Blanchard situational theory and victors
normative leadership theory
According to Situational leadership theories the effective
leadership changes according to the change in situation, they adapt to the
change management and their styles approach with different circumstances. For a
leader to be efficient and effective for his followers has to adapt to changes,
accept them and make it easier for his subordinates or followers to know the
importance of change. Some employees listen to a leader who is more directive
and autocratic in nature. Some employees listen easily to those leaders who
trust their employees and let them make decisions and utilize their skills.
Effective leadership buoys up a proficient and progressive
atmosphere. It acts as a catalyst that speeds up and boosts all the other
occupational facets work in tempo. Leaders influence employees by making them
understand the vision and importance of their role in a particular scenario or
outcome. They motivate their followers by praising their efforts and
understanding their needs. They monitor their employees or followers by
outlining their roles in a work process and providing essential riggings
required to perform those duties. A good leader always explains the task that
he assigns to his employees, provides the resources necessary to carry out that
task, directs their work, and is always available to assist his followers.
The role of leadership is of great importance for any
organization or group of people because leaders are the people who help in the
positive execution of any task through right amount of motivation and planning.
Situational leadership deals with objective to meet the leadership actions with
respect to the different needs of various circumstances and situation. A
situational model of leadership devised by Hersey and Blanchard identifies the
competence and willingness of the followers and then adapting to their needs as
a leader. The style of leadership of a leader is based on his working environment
and current situations. This particular leadership style is used in positively bring
change in a social system. People who follow it are change oriented. They are
achievers and they help others to achieve. Such leaders have a captivating
vision that win the assurance of their followers [4]
Another leadership style is the normative leadership theory
brought forward by Victor Vroom and Philip Yetton. He devised a decision making
model that shows the effectiveness of improving the process of decision making
among the leader and the employees for change management. In 1973 Victor and Philip
identified five different styles of leadership. These five styles are further
divided into three categories. The first category is the autocratic leadership
style, the second category is consultative leadership style and the third
category is the group orientated leadership style. Autocratic leadership style
consists of two subgroups AI and AII.
Consultative style consists of two subgroups CI and CII. Group
Orientated leadership style has GII. In autocratic leadership, in AI the
leaders make decision on their own without any input from followers, from the
information available to him. In AII the leaders asks for information from the
followers but makes decision on his own without asking for the input of
followers. In consultative leadership, in the CI phase the leader has the
authority to make decision on his own, he meets the employees or followers
individually and explains everything to them, and he may ask for their opinion
and take information or ideas from them but make decision by himself with or
without the input from his followers. In CII consultative leadership style
leader make decision on his own but he may or may not include the opinions of
his followers.
He meets his followers in the form of a group and tells them
about any idea or situation to ask for their opinions or information regarding
the particular scenario. The leader then takes his decision alone with or
without the input of his followers. Afterwards the leader lets them brainstorm
and makes the decision together with his followers on the base of group
consensus without trying to implement his decision on the group he asks for
their support and basis the final decision on the consensus of the group
members in absence of consensus. This style is based on two factors; first
factor shows input and participation whereas second factor shows quality of
decision and time pressure [5]
Evaluation of Situational Theory and Normative Leadership
Theory
Strengths of Coaching Leadership Style in Situational Theory
It provides high support to employees
The leader can achieve his/her goals as well as can meet the
socio-emotional needs of his/her employees
This style encourages employee to do well
This style of leadership allows leaders to get valuable
input from employees regarding given tasks and responsibilities
This leadership style can be applied to variety of
organizations and situations as per the requirements
This leadership style allows leaders to listen to the issues
and problems of employees, and rectify them to keep employees motivated for the
job [6]
Weaknesses of Coaching Leadership Style in Situational
Theory
This leadership style is a time taking one, as leaders have
to give enough time for employees to recover from any emotional situation and
do their work
The leader with this style must have skills to get most out
of it, otherwise if coaching leadership style is implemented incorrectly, then
things can get worst rather getting
better
This leadership style may not work well in all given
situations, as there can be situations, where it cannot be applied due to
various limitations [6]
Strengths of Consultative Leadership in Normative Theory
It enables two way communication between the leader and its
subordinates, which helps to decrease any communication gaps
It helps to develop a better and more meaningful
relationship between the leader and his subordinates
In this style, the employees feel that they are values by
their leaders, and such aspect motivates and encourages them to take positive initiatives
It helps employees to bring in more innovative & creative
ideas
The leaders also get feedback anything, which is not in the
right direction, which allows them to keep things on right track
If employees’ feedback and ideas are heard and applied, they
would become more loyal and committed
Weaknesses of Consultative Leadership in Normative Theory
If a task is needed to complete on urgent basis, then this
leadership style won’t help as it takes time to move with this style
Due to its time consuming nature, this leadership style
becomes ineffective in various situations
If leader listens to his/her subordinates, but takes decisions
on his own, then it can discourage employees to share their ideas next time
This leadership style asks to consult with all employees,
which may result in conflicting opinions from everyone, making the decision
process difficult that which opinion should be given more value
Q2. Two change theories in order to smooth the change
The Change management theories are main factor of success
for any change in organizations if implemented properly. There are different
theories for change management with their own benefits and weaknesses for
various organizations. It is important for Gosfield Park’s management team to review
that how change is going to be implemented with best outcomes and how they can
be successful in it. For this purpose, they can look for two change management
theories to integrate relevant changes. The first change management theory is 7
S Model of McKinsey. This model was developed in 1980s by the consultant team
of McKinsey & Company, and it has been one of the most persistent change management
models over the years. This model has seven total steps to follow, and these
steps can be critical for Gosfield Park’s management team to manage change with
success
It is important to look at these seven steps so that
incremental change for Gosfield Park’s management team can be analyzed in this
regard that how it can be achieved. Here are the seven steps of this change
model:
Strategy: It is a first stage as per this model, which
asserts that to bring in change, it is important to first make a considerable
plan. This plan should be well thought out with different constant steps
Structure: In this model, the 2nd stage is called structure.
It actually means to review in detail that what kind of structure is followed
by an organization so that change management process can be managed according
to that structure.
Systems: This is third stage of this model, which asks to
develop a system for change management, which streamlines day to day activities
and procedures elated to change being adopted by the organization.
Shared Values: This stage asks to integrate shared values of
organizations in change process, which are held by the organization.
Style: This stage looks to adopt a style, which is needed
for an organization or leadership to make the change process successful. Some
styles may work in one situation, and may not work in other situations, so it
is important to come up with a suitable style.
Staff: The employee or teams working in an organization are
one of the most important parts of this change model, and that’s why they are
included in this model, because without them, the change cannot be adopted
successfully.
Skills: The last stage of this model talks about skills as
well as competencies of employees. It means that organization must develop employees’
competency & skills to embrace change and adopt it as quickly as possible [7]
So, these are seven stages of this model, which can be
applied by Gosfield Park’s management team so that they can adopt relevant
change.
Another change management theory is the six change approach
designed by Kotter and Schlesinger. The purpose behind creating this theory is
to prevent or lessen the resistance of employees to bring a change. It is a
very useful model that covers many aspects of change. It includes four main
factors of resistance that are misunderstanding, self-interest of employees,
lack of tolerance towards change and the disagreement of employees with proper
reasons. In order to deal with the employee resisting a change, there are six
common approaches. The first is proper education and communication, in this
approach employees are educated and communicated with to show them the logic
behind bringing this change and its benefits. The second is participation and
involvement; if employees are properly involved in the efforts of bringing
change then they will stop resisting it and start supporting change.
The third is support and facilitation, when management
supports employees in accepting the process of change management then they will
easily move on through the stage of transition by letting go of their fears.
The fourth approach is the negotiation and agreement phase where managers
tackle the employee resistance towards change by offering them reimbursements
for not resisting the change and see the importance of change for organization.
The fifth approach is co-option and manipulation; co-option consists of the
gesture of patronizing for bringing someone to the group of change management
in order to make them participate and not just contribute substantively. The
sixth approach of the six change approach in dealing with the resistance to
change is the implicit and explicit coercion; in this approach the managers to
force the employees either explicitly or implicitly to accept a change in the
management and if they resist the change they will be having consequences of
losing the job or their promotion. [8]
Evaluation of Change Models of change management and
leadership
Positives of McKinsey 7 S Model of Change of change
management and leadership
This model is very beneficial for an organization to get
insight about its work structure and methods to integrate change
The practical as well as emotional elements of change are
well integrated by this model so that employees can be able to smoothly go
through the transition phase
The organizational change can get directional aspects with
this model
The other good thing about this model is that it does not
leave anything unnoticed, rather it focuses on each and every part of an
organization to manage change so that things can be on right track during the
change process
Negatives of McKinsey 7 S Model of Change of change
management and leadership
The major negative part of this model is that all aspects in
this model are interdependent and interrelated, so if one of the aspects fails,
the whole process can be ruined and things will be failed overall
As compared to other models, this one is bit complex to
understand
The chances of failure are more with this model as compared
to chances of getting successful
Positives of Six Change Approach Leadership and change
management
It can help to eliminate resistance to change by
communication and giving education to the change agents in an organization
Due to involvement and participation, the people will give
more input for the change process, helping to get it done
When people are feeling anxiety along with fair to adopt a
change, this model can be helpful in mitigating these feelings by providing
facilitation & support
It can be a quick as well as effective change model to fight
with resistance to change
Negatives of Six Change Approach Leadership
This process of change explained in this model is extremely
time consuming
If team members give input, which is inappropriate to
integrate in change, then it can waste time & resources
The process of change may take time with used resources, but
still it can get failed
It can be an expensive model to adopt as it asks to develop
support for everyone, and develop the essence of agreement
So, Gosfield Park’ team can look into these six approaches
to manage their change process. If they feel they need a process of change, which
helps in developing resistance to change, and takes employees on board, then
these six approaches can be instrumental for them to manage the whole change
process successfully, even it is a transformational change or transitional
change.
Conclusion on change management and leadership
It can be concluded that for the change management, a leader
need to evaluate his efficient expertise and technical skills so that team
members can be effectively help in order to achieve the goals. It is analyzed
that a change a leader needs to be democratic and visionary for the benefits in
the future.
Change is very important for any organization and business
to anchor and stay for long. Leaders are very important to anchor that change
and bring out productive outcomes from process. Change management is that the
method, tools and techniques that square measure employed by a business to
manage its staff and come through desired and productive prospects for his or
her organization. It’s the systematic approach applied by productive
organizations for managing their staff and providing them with apt skills, data
and support to give birth to a positive modification. Leadership is that the
method of leading that motivates a bunch of individuals that to a definite
leader for achieving their goals and objectives.
Smart leadership applies such methods that facilitate staff
to satisfy the necessities of their organization. Leadership traits square
measure more practical then management because it conjures up, supervises and
communicates with the workers of the organization. There are two styles of
leadership. According to Situational leadership theories the effective
leadership changes according to the change in situation, they adapt to the
change management and their styles approach with different circumstances. Another
leadership style is the normative leadership that devises a decision making
model that shows the effectiveness of improving the process of decision making
among the leader and the employees for change management. There are different
theories for change management with their own benefits and weaknesses for
various organizations. The considerable change management theory is the six
change approach and the purpose behind creating this theory is to prevent or
lessen the resistance of employees to bring a change [9]
References of change management and leadership
[1]
|
S. son, "case study of successful change
management," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.tinypulse.com/blog/sk-case-studies-successful-change-management.
|
[2]
|
Q. R. a. Robert, "Change Management and Leadership
Development Have to Mesh," Harvard business publishing., 2016.
|
[3]
|
Cohen., " The Heart of Change," in managing
transition, 2002.
|
[4]
|
N. Augustine, "Reshaping an industry: lockheed
martin’s survival story," Harvard Business Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp.
83-94, 1987.
|
[5]
|
Y. a. M. E. F. Allaire, Theories of organizational
culture. Organization Studies, 1984.
|
[6]
|
D. C. Shonhiwa, "An Examination of the Situational
Leadership Approach: Strengths," Cross-Currents: An International
Peer-Reviewed Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.
35-40, 2016.
|
[7]
|
A. "Major Approaches & Models of Change
Management," 2015. [Online]. Available:
https://www.cleverism.com/major-approaches-models-of-change-management/.
[Accessed 21 November 2018].
|
[8]
|
Kotter, "The Heart of Change, Managing Transitions,
2nd Edition," 2002.
|
[9]
|
Tsui, "In Leaders and managers: International
perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership," in A multiple
constituency framework of managerial reputational effectiveness, 1984.
|