FAHR’s main responsibility is to develop HR in Government
Sector based on modern concepts and tools used in the field of HR Management.
In order to do so, they get involved by proposing the most suitable Performance
Management System (PMS) in line with regulations and obtains Cabinet’s consent
on the same prior to implementation. By doing so, FAHR aims to support
government entities to increase Human Capital’s capacity and to maximize their
efficiencies and accordingly ensure that complying government entities are
highly performing and achieving set targets.
Since this Authority is in charge of setting basis for PMS
for all Federal Authorities, the group decided that it will be a great
opportunity to view their followed system, the step by step process and look at
all the inputs in a consultative way in order to recommend enhancements, if
any.
The group decided to look into FAHR’s Performance related
practices, evaluate and conclude associated suggestions.
Introduction of PM Consultancy
for Federal Authority for Government Human Resources (FAHR)
The group communicated with FAHR through its single point of
contact, highlighted in the reference part. Then, the group reviewed FAHR’s practices
related to Performance Management System (PMS) and based on the review they concluded
with few suggestions that should increase the effectiveness of the Performance
Management System.
The aim of this project is to review FAHR’s PMS from a
consultative way. FAHR draw the best PMS and apply it on Federal Government
Entities in UAE. This review is important because the group was curious about
the PMS followed by government entities and this project was an opportunity to
explore it and maybe conclude some suggestions that will enhance the welfare of
the employees and improve their performance.
The report will start with a brief overview of the
organization, its structure and the description of the current performance
management and measurement system. Then, it will set few suggestions. The
report read in conjunction with Performance Management System literatures and
theories, which is listed in the reference part.
Organization Design of PM
Consultancy for Federal Authority for Government Human Resources (FAHR)
FAHR is a federal authority that aims to develop HR in
Government sector by utilizing latest HR concepts and international standards.
FAHR enjoys an independent corporate body to resume all works in order to
achieve its objectives and its subordinate to UAE’s Cabinet. It is established
as per federal decree law # 11 – 2018, issued by His Highness Sheikh Khalifa
Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President of United Arab Emirates. (Fahr.gov.ae, 2018)
Following is the organizational chart of FAHR

Organizational Chart - Source (Fahr.gov.ae, 2018)
Based on reaching out FAHR it is noticed that they follow the
Deming Cycle (PDCA) with more emphasis on Planning and Check parts in order to
establish PMS. Following are the steps that are followed with each and every Government
Entity.
Pre-requisites
Explore the Government Entity’s mission and align to departmental
missions.
Analyze jobs within that entity in order to determine the
key components & identify the needed knowledge, skills and abilities.
Performance Planning
Discuss the results by including the key accountabilities
and employee responsibilities, specific objectives, goals to be reached and
performance standards.
Also, discuss about the required competencies and finally
areas of improvement.
Performance Execution
This is the responsibility of employees and managers.
FAHR encourages all individuals within the government entity
to:
Be committed to the set goals and to openly & regularly
communicate these goals with the supervisor.
Be prepared for the performance review/appraisal.
To observe and document performance of subordinates.
To update subordinates on goal changes (if any)
To provide needed resources and reinforcement (if needed).
Performance Assessment (Pre - Performance Appraisal)
FAHR encourages every employee to self-appraisal his/herself
prior to being appraised by the supervisor.
FAHR emphasize on all individuals within the government
entity to perform this step and maintain evidence/records (if needed) as it is
an important input to the Performance Review (Performance Appraisal)
Performance Review (Performance Appraisal)
Supervisor and employee should agree on an “appraisal
meeting” to set and discuss employee’s performance.
Such meeting should cover past, present and future performances.
The future will cover expectations, goals and development plans.
FAHR mandates that such appraisal needs to be formally
document as it is an important record and can be used while doing performance
renewal and re-contracting.
Performance Renewal and Re-contracting
By using information that is collected during the previous
steps and particularly during the Performance Review (the Performance
Appraisal), FAHR supports the government entity to make modifications and
enhancements to the Performance Management System that should take into
consideration increasing productivity while maintaining a happy environment
among the employees within that government entity.
Examples on the enhancements that can be made are adding new
accountabilities and competencies and increasing or reducing the weight of some
goals.
Reading literature, this PMS process is found to be the
conventional and the most common used process. (AKELLA and WAQIF, 2017)
Being a responsible authority for HR in the Ministries and
the Government Entities, FAHR cares for people and therefore, it works on
giving proposal of HR policies and legislations at Government level, assisting the
Entities to carry out correct execution of those legislations.
In the same context, and in line with PMS that is applied in
all Government Entities, FAHR worked out a mechanism to link PMS, Performance
Measures and Performance Appraisal with various rewards such as annual
increments, bonuses (in some government entities) and ceremonial awards for
best departments, best practices, best projects and so on. FAHR acknowledges
that in order to have an effective PMS then reward should be an integral part
of the overall system in order to encourage individuals and function to better perform.
Such a devotion to focus on employees’ motivation by
rewarding and awarding individual, functions, teams and department is very much
appreciated, this is concluded by many literatures such as (Gunputh, Gunnuck
and Pudaruth, 2017).
From all the aforementioned practices and other deployments,
FAHR’s ultimate goal is to enhance the competitiveness of the UAE government
through achieving career harmony for the Federal Government Human Capital, and by
supporting them in increasing their capacity and maximizing their efficiencies,
in addition to optimizing the use of systems and to continuously develop
innovative solutions to serve them.
Identification of areas for further
improvement of PM Consultancy for Federal Authority for Government Human
Resources (FAHR)
The group was unable to visualize any shortcoming in PMS practice
that is being followed and applied by FAHR. It is obvious that FAHR is
continuously spotting and tackling the areas for improvement. For example, they
have created a huge HR database “Bayanati”, which has managed 2.2 million
transactions during year 2017. Moreover, they have introduced FAHR application
that made it easier to have remote access on the said database. Also, they have
introduced ePerformance Management System few years back with substantial
modifications on the system during 2017. Finally, and during the same year,
they launched an updated version of eTraining and Development system. (Fahr.gov.ae,
2018)
Conclusion & Recommendations
of PM Consultancy for Federal Authority for Government Human Resources (FAHR)
In Governments, it is very important to have one body that
draws the Performance Management System framework and spread it amongst the
organizations to follow and implement. It helps in unifying the practices,
easily visualizing the efforts and successfully achieving the government’s
goals, strategies and directives.
FAHR followed the process of PMS and is continuously working
on improving and automating many parts of it; in order to have a readily
accessible and a centralized database of all HR and Government Departments
associated with all aspects of PMS.
We have the following suggestions for further improvement:
Workout a methodology to force the self-review & make it
a part of the process.
Make it mandatory that both the employee and the supervisor
to provide evidences that back their ratings.
Study the possibility of having a multi-rater process (for
example from internal and external customers). This will be useful to have a
better view on the performance of individuals as well as functions/units/teams.
Within the same process, introduce a succession plan scheme
that will clarify the career path for every employee within the government
entity.
References of PM Consultancy for Federal
Authority for Government Human Resources (FAHR)
AKELLA, S. and WAQIF, A. (2017). IMPLEMENTATION OF
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN INDIAN IT INDUSTRY: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY.
CLEAR International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, [online]
8(1), pp.7-11. Available at: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com [Accessed 28 Jun. 2018]
Fahr.gov.ae. (2018). Performance Management System for the
employees of Federal Government | Federal Authority for Government Human
Resources. [online] Available at: https://www.fahr.gov.ae [Accessed 1 Jul.
2018]
Gunputh, R., Gunnuck, S. and Pudaruth, S. (2017). The
Relationship Between a Performance Management System and the Motivational Level
of Employees: A Case Study at the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development
of the Republic of Mauritius. Theory, Methodology, Practice, 13(2), pp.25-34.
Hessa Al Qaidi at 04-2319004 - EPMS-Support@fahr.gov.ae