Introduction of Rights Based Approach to Anti-Corruption

Right-based approach is used for the development promoted though many agencies of development as well as organizations of non-government to get a positive transformation between the several development actors. Among the human rights as well as economic development this practice blurs the difference. In right based development there are two group of stakeholders one is right holders (those who have no experience about the rights) as well as the other is duty bearers (those ho fulfill the holder’s rights). The aim of rights-based approaches is strengthening the capability of duty bearers as well as right holders authorize. This is the approach about the people to claim as well as know about their rights as well as also increase the accountability and ability of individual (Rothstein, 2011).

Solution of Rights Based Approach to Anti-Corruption

The significant component of successful as well as sustainable strategies of anti-corruption human right based approach is perfect. For a comprehensive strategy a rights-based to corruption calls to encourage the efficient institutions, good governance, appropriate laws, as well as participation of concerned stakeholders. Similarly, in the presence o a strong legal system civil activism against corruption could only thrive as well as an open political framework. The best solution to the problem of corruption in different countries transparency as well as accountability is the basic principles, which are integral to successful strategies of anti-corruption this right-based approach is used in different countries. On governmental purposes, policies as well as decision, decision making of transparent, measure to improve the accountability and transparency (Ackerman, 2013).

On the principles of accountability, equality, transparency, non-discrimination as well as to strength the anti-corruption effort participation is needed a human right-based approach to anti-corruption is founded. To the realization of all human rights corruption is an enormous obstacle such as political, economic, civil, culture and social and right of development. In the field of anti-corruption as well as human rights there is a vital need to reinforce collaboration among the international effort as well as into the activities of UN agencies to integrate human rights working to fight corruption, as well as including social media and civil society are the relevant stakeholders. Specific to certain countries, regions, traditions or societies corruption is not localized problem. Similarly, according to demand of popular as well as global to combat corruption to a movement of new human rights, these share the same values for both anti-corruptions along with promotion of human rights (Bo Rothstein, 2014).

Pros and cons of Rights Based Approach to Anti-Corruption

Here we analysis the pros and cons of the right-based approach to anti-corruption. On solidarity this approach is anchored that enhances as well as empowers people their capacity to enhance the quality of their lives though charity often the vulnerable dis-empowers the poor.

For people the programming of human rights entails the building the capacity of community to have knowledge about their rights, have to assert their rights, as well as to realizing these rights make the meaningful contributions. In itself participation is an objective. In decision making process the participation of children along with women strengthens the ownership as well as a voice gives the marginalized sustainability (Nancy F. Berglas, 2014).

In decision making process involving the marginalized means the guide of supposed beneficiary’s key decision of investment.  Basically it’s a people centered approach towards development. The other advantage is that it also improves the accountability as well as transparency through public officials as well as consequently leads to better governance.

If we will turn towards limitations of human right based approach to anti-corruption, we would see that the disadvantages or downside of this approach are mainly three fold such as its origin the other is about in its operationalization problems as well as the consequences of negative. Another disadvantage of this approach is that while moving towards HRBA to anti-corruption, less focus is observed on service deliver and general capacity building whereas more on enabling the duty-bearer to respond to claims. In short we can say that human right based approach to anti-corruption is not considered to be suitable for all types of recipient communities.

This study is focusing on different theories and discussion about the protection of human rights as well as anti-corruption work. The proposed audiences are the specialist of anti-corruption wishing to know regarding the principles of human rights as well as work of anti-corruption.

Conclusion on Rights Based Approach to Anti-Corruption

It is concluded that right based approach to anti-corruption is very effective.  According to the above discussion the relationship among the corruption and human rights has been coming from the last ten decades. It should be recommended that for all stakeholders’ courses of action and practical steps in order to take and to make the development on integrating the anti –corruption as well as human rights. For common work of anti-corruption as well as human rights community a number of substantial issues come in our mind. Because of this approach the poor people have the opportunity to claims or fights for their rights. The myth about this is debunking tensions among anti-corruption and human rights goals, which overrated easily.

This study shows, a human rights approach to anti-corruption, does not necessarily mean changing the current practice drastically. On the other hand, to some extent many anti-corruption actors already incorporated the rights of human. In shaping the decision this means giving people opportunities to participate that effect on the rights of human.

References of Rights Based Approach to Anti-Corruption

Ackerman, J. M., 2013. Rethinking the international anti-corruption agenda: Civil society, human rights and democracy. Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 29, p. 293.

Bo Rothstein, 2014. What is the opposite of corruption?. Third World Quarterly, 35(5), pp. 737-752.

Nancy F. Berglas, N. A. C. a. E. J. O., 2014. A rights‐based approach to sexuality education: Conceptualization, clarification and challenges. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 46(2), pp. 63-72.

Rothstein, B., 2011. Anti-corruption: the indirect ‘big bang’approach. Review of International Political Economy, 18(2), pp. 228-250.