It is a fact that an organization has to deal with various
internal and external factors, which can play part in its success or failure,
and one of the important external factors is environment. The organization is
surrounded by an environment, which can be significant to it in so many ways.
Any changes to the environmental factors can have a huge impact on the
organization. An organization can lose important segment of the customer or it
can lose any cost advantage for its business processes due to changes in
surrounding environment. So, organization cannot leave these environmental
changes unattended for too long, and they will have to adapt to these
particular environmental changes so that business processes can be run
normally, smoothly & deficiently as they were running before these changes.
There are several good points of the contingency theory;
The flexible ways for the styles of the management and the
leader can decision by considering the various point rather than by making the
standards one to taking decision for their employees and organization.
By applying this theory business can be able to measure the
problems in effective manners as well as their management can be adapted for
specific needs of the organization.
The opinions of the employees matter for taking the decision
about the organization as well as for any kinds of the management change with
in the organizations.
Keeping
above mentioned discussion about environmental factors in view, it can be said
that contingency theory is the one, which can be instrumental for an
organization to adapt to the environmental changes. According to contingency
theory, the organization cannot adopt any universal set rule or guideline,
which can make it a perfect one by making those universal decisions, rather
theory asserts that organization is an entity, which is dependent on various
internal as well as external factors, and it will have to make decisions
according to these changing factors. Uncertainty is a main feature for
structure of an organization, which is covered by contingency theory, which
means that an organization will have to deal with uncertainty by making optimal
decisions time to time by looking at changes in internal & external
elements.
So, when an
organization will try to react to every change in the internal and external
environment, and decisions will be made accordingly for each individual factor;
that means the organization is using contingency theory, which is leading to
develop the essence of complex adaptive systems (CAS). The CAS asserts that
organization cannot wholly understand the system behavior of whole organization
just by understanding parts of an organization individually. It clearly means
that an organization has a system, which is based on various interacting parts;
these parts change & evolve over time. So organization will have to use
complex adaptive system method to deal with the changes of every part of the
system so that whole organization can be managed successfully.
Why power and politics are important concepts to consider in
designing organizational structure and operational procedures? Explain this by
comparing a rationalistic approach in organizational theory.
The theory of the rational organization is referred as the
idea that an organization, just like as the business is referred as the tool
for attaining the set of the goals. The
formal structure is used in the rationale organization for defining the role of
each member in the organization. According to this theory the goals and roles
are defined in effective manners. According to this theory the management
process in the organization must be rationale and predictable.
This contingency theory deals with the situation, which
means that a leader acts according to the demand of a situation. It also means
that leadership does not come with any particular methods to apply; rather
leader reacts to certain given situations. So, it is up to their ability and
skills that how they adapt to different situations and what necessary skills
they show as per requirement of a situation. An organization may have to face
different situations, and this theory asserts that a leader should have skills
to act according to each situation to achieve success.
The rational organization will have a proper system or
structure, where roles will be defined for everyone, and they will act
accordingly. In real terms, organizations do have a rationalistic approach in
their behavior, but it is not the only thing to structure an organization,
because organizations also have politics in their behavior as well. Meanwhile
the contingency management theory leads towards the democratic leadership’s
styles in which all of the employees and audiences are involved in the decision
and matters of the organization. According to the contingency theory of the
Fiedler the leader always follow the two major points which are the task
oriented and people oriented.
The organization is an entity, which has to design a proper
structure so that organizational procedures can be managed accordingly. In this
process, the organization has to make various decisions and distribute
authority so that relevant powers can be exercised. Keeping this fact in view,
the organizations are considered political structures as organizations also
deal with distribution of power and authority, which means that politics is also
an element in its structure. To understand the political pyramid in structure
of an organization, it is important to understand that individuals get a power
base in organizations, which means that other than the economic point of view,
the organizations will have a political structure to handle that provide
various options for people to grow their career through authority & power.
The power exercised by an individual leads to complete few relevant activities
and power is used to influence others so that those activities are performed
accordingly. It is also a fact that power is not only enjoyed by the leaders,
but it is also exercised by employees in a way so that they can ensure their
survival.
The politics and power are important parts of organizational
behavior, but they can also be dangerous as well because when power and
authority is exercised, and if it had no particular checks then various
problematic things can happen such as corruption, abuse of power, excessive
domination, scandals, as well as suppression & exploitation of people
having no power. There is one more view to handle structure of organization and
that is rationalistic approach of organizational theory. According to this
theory, the organization is an entity, which has certain definable objectives
to achieve. The rational organization will have a proper system or structure,
where roles will be defined for everyone, and they will act accordingly. In
real terms, organizations do have a rationalistic approach in their behavior,
but it is not the only thing to structure an organization, because
organizations also have politics in their behavior as well. The individuals may
have defined role but they can use power on their own terms to influence others
in the organization.