For each topic, discuss whether you think the sample is representative of the population being studied. What criteria did you use to decide this?

Answer: yes history and literature both the subject topics are representative of the population as they both deal with humanities in all means. History talks about our past and makes the record of our ancestors whereas the literature is studied to make us kind and courteous in our lives.

Q no 2: was the sample chosen in a way that is likely to introduce bias? What kind of errors is likely to be associated with each study? Explain

Answer: yes history or even literature are introducing bias sometimes. History may occur with distortion sometimes. Whereas the literature is considered outdated to some modernists even.

Q no 3: Based on what you read, do you believe that the results of each study are meaningful and important, Explain?

Answer: yes, history deals with meaningful gone by realities still useful to know the characteristics of that very race. And literature also deals with precious human experiences and observations useful for our daily dealings in the public domain.

Q no 4: Based on the responses above, which do you think is the stronger study? Why

Answer: Both history and literature are the studies that take our morality to its highest and make our behaviors quite humane to help us move smoothly in a civilized society.