Question No. 1
The store supervisor unable to accommodate to
the employee because the employee was suffering from glaucoma and it can be
harmful to her if she drives at night, therefore, the store should provide her
daytime schedule. It won't be unfair to other employees because the other
employees are not suffering from such disability and if the employer discusses
the situation of her with other employees they might understand. It would be
appropriate if flexible working hours would be given to the employee.
Question No. 5
After analyzing the situation, it can be said
that the employer unable to accommodate his employee. The employer is at fault
because it does not interact with the employee effectively and did not discuss
the accommodation. The employee clearly notifies that it needs accommodation
and asked its employer to provide him the exemption to work a few minutes later
after lunch. Employer believes that if he accepts the request of the employee
than it would eliminate an important part of its job duty that is punctuality.
However, if the employer provides flexible working hour to him disable employee
than it won't affect the requirement of the job of the employer.
Question No. 6
After analyzing the situation, the court might
give the verdict against the employer and in favor of the disabled employee
because the employee is suffering from serious mental disease and it is
important for the employee to take medicine in the morning. The medicine has
the huge impact on him and he cannot work effectively at that time. Therefore,
it would be appropriate if he would start late in the morning and makeup by
working after 6:00 p.m. because the agency stays open until 10:00 p.m.
Question No. 11
The court should rule in the favor of
receptionist because it is not appropriate to write such words who harm the
sentiments of religious individuals. They could choose other words that won't
harm the sentiments of others.