Introduction of Project management with the manger and without Manger

At the start of the 21 century, the Agile become the hot topic in the project management because different framework took advantage of a rising hype. There are different ways of the Agile in project management like;

· Kanban

· Scrum

· Scrumban

Whereas in the project management, the Kanban methods were formulated a decade ago, and it is also focused on continuous and change proves of the improvements. Because this method has a different core of practice. In the project management the Serum is the perceptive framework, but many believed that it is method that is the iterative approach which is used the time box intervals plus splits the projects into the fixed periods. The method of the agile Scrumban takes the Kanban philosophy along with the practice, which lies on the top of the Scrum (Gonzalez & al, 2014).

Aim of Project management with the manger and without Manger

The aims of the study, first of all, demonstrate how the project management works with the mangers, how it works without the mangers. And then analyze that which is impact on the project management with the mangers or without the mangers means it’s good or bad.

Outcome of Project management with the manger and without Manger

The study demonstrates that it has a good impact if the project management can be done without the manger because, in Agile project management, it does not require the participation and the presence of the mangers. But the manger is good for the success which is under the delivery of the traditional projects (Dye & al, 2011). Therefore the project manger is not obsolete in the Agile work of project management where the different organization is still using the project for the Agile , and it particularly has larger and complex ones in the organization.

References of Project management with the manger and without Manger