Introduction of such as Google, Facebook and
Apple
The authoritarian
regimes are the ones that tend to be autocratic by having the power being
concentrated in one person. In the said regimes, the powers as well as the
authorities are shared among the government institutions and the officials.
Google, Facebook and Apple are well-known companies of the world. For every
product/ service whereby the product is dealing with the personal data, there
is an immense need to take into consideration the privacy related issues. The
main motive behind it is to provide the security to the personal data & the
information of the users.
Analysis of such as Google, Facebook and
Apple
The Western
companies (such as Google, Facebook and Apple) have the well-defined set for the Western
Core values i.e., relating to the freedom of the speech, democracy as well as
the maintenance for the user’s privacy. It is strictly followed in their origin
of the operations. But when it comes to operating in the authoritarian
regimes (such as China or the other such regions where all the powers and the
authorities are centralized) then the deviation from the core values is
noticed. In such countries, there is no such concept that the ruling is done by
having the people point of view. Rather it is considered that every authority
lies with the government. It is the sole body to hold the authority for making
the nation’s decisions. The people are to follow these decisions without making
any participation to the decision-making processes. The famous companies under
discussion i.e., Google, Facebook and Apple when tends to perform the
operations in such regions they are also obliged to follow the rules and the
regulations of the said region (apple, 2019).
The authority still lies with the government. All the major decisions are made
by the central body. It can be said that the element of the democracy is
eliminated from the list. When it comes to the freedom of the speech then this
point goes with the partial responsibility. As far as the privacy of the users
is concerned then it holds true irrespective of the region to operate. For the
users of any social media application, the most important thing is the
protection of their personal data. The more the user’s personal data is
secured, the more it is reliable to use a platform.
Conclusion
of
such as Google, Facebook and Apple
The authoritarian
regimes are the autocratic because of holding the power as well as the
authorities with more concentration towards a central body. The companies
operating in these regions (such
as Google, Facebook and Apple)
should try to have the responsibility for their Western Core Values to the
possible extent. Out of various available parameters, most important is the
provision of the privacy to the user’s personal data. It is perceived that the
users feel more comfortable to work with the applications whereby they feel
more secured.
2). Do
such companies have the responsibility for the security of the authoritarian
regimes that they operate in?
Introduction of such as Google, Facebook and
Apple
The companies under discussion are Google, Facebook and
Apple. They have the long success stories behind their current worth. There are
various challenges these companies had faced in order to reach at the current
position & the market share. It can be either in the form of customer’s
needs & expectations, the norm s& culture as well as the rules &
the regulations of a country etc. When it comes to provide the services in the
regions other than their actual domain of the operations then the rules and the
regulations of that specified region also need to be followed.
Analysis
of
such as Google, Facebook and Apple
Although the Western
companies (such as Google, Facebook and Apple) have the well-defined set for the Western
Core values which are strictly followed in the country of origin. But when the
companies tend to perform the operations in some authoritarian regimes, then
these companies also become liable to provide the security for the authoritarian
regimes. This security can either provided in the form of backed up database or
other cyber security issues. The main agenda behind these steps is to ensure
the authoritarian regimes that these famous companies like Google, Facebook and
Apple are fully taking into consideration the privacy concerns of the said
country. Also, the inhabitants of the specified country feel themselves more
secure and protected while using the services of these reliable service
providers. The data gathered for the purpose of the market research work is
also saved and secured. It can contain any personal data or any state related
data (being collected by the survey teams of Google, Facebook and Apple) (Crowley, 2013). The important thing
is the provision of the security to the state concerns. Once the organizations
are successful in providing the surety to the government of the authoritarian
regimes that their privacy and the security concerns are highly valued, only then
the functions and the operations of these companies are streamlined in such
regions.
Conclusion of such as Google, Facebook and
Apple
It can be concluded
that the companies which adopt to serve the regions other than their primary
regions of the operation have to take into consideration the concerns of both
i.e., the users as well the overall region. It can be said that they both have
the direct association with each other. In case one is provided with the
security, the other automatically gets the security and vice versa. The main
thing is to provide the overall region with the security for the private data
of the users. The more reliability and the security of the personal data provides
the users with the comfort zone that their service providers are highly
reliable who care more about protecting their personal data and the private
information.
References of such as Google, Facebook
and Apple
apple, 2019. About Apple security. [Online]
Available at: https://support.apple.com/en-hk/HT208848
Crowley, M. C., 2013. Not a happy accident: How Google deliberately
designs workplace satisfaction. Science Direct, Volume 21.