In this paper, Marketing Myopia of
Kodak is discussed as the company made a classic mistake because it focuses
more on selling products rather than a business. Theodore Levitt in Harvard
Business Review provided the concept of Marketing Myopia that businesses should
adapt to the requirements of the market which Kodak did not and “Kodak failed
to adapt to a new marketplace and new consumer attitudes” (Dan, 2012).
However, Marketing Myopia is the term that could be referred to as an
inward-looking approach to marketing. There is no fulfillment of the immediate
needs of the company but there is focusing on marketing from the consumer point
of view. Consequently, Marketing Myopia of Kodak is explained in the paper as
the company concerned more on sales rather than marketing as well as knowledge
about the consumer’s preferences according to advancement. However, in this
paper, there are also recommendations that how Kodak or other companies need to
focus on marketing strategies including entrepreneurial greatness and
innovation in today's marketplace.
1) Marketing Strategies that lead to
Marketing Myopia
Marketing Myopia of
Kodak could also be described as the narrow-minded marketing approach of the
company that does not focused on the actual demand of the customer and just on
quality. There was a focus on the short term goals rather than long term goals.
Marketing Myopia of Kodak focused on the mass production without knowing the
demand of the customer (Pahwa, 2019).
Marketing Myopia could be explained as the planning of short-term goals only;
these companies fail to adapt trends of the market as well as the preferences
of the customer’s choices. However, in order to get safe from Marketing Myopia;
the companies should focus efficiently on the target audience, their wants and
needs and the company should be more customer-oriented. Marketing Myopia is
explained as the longsighted nature of marketing, which should be dealing with
the help of good management for the long-term benefits (Kerin & Hartley, 2015).
Market Domain of
Marketing Myopia
In
the late 1980s, Kodak was founded and it became a renowned organization in the
industry of photography. Its market domain was photography industry and as it
continued to operate, it faced several challenges. One challenge was quite
significant and it led the organization to bankruptcy. For almost ten decades,
the organization was at the forefront and leader of photography with numerous
inventions and innovations, making this art affordable and accessible to the
customer. In 1889, the Eastman Kodak Company was founded by George Eastman and
the first Kodak camera was introduced by it. It took only a little time for the
camera to become famous among customers and achieve success. In the industry of
photography, the organization not only introduced an innovative product but
also built its name by effective marketing.
Eastman
had a firm belief in making the art of photography available to almost everyone
and he sought to do this by innovating the manner in which photographs were
taken by people. By developing the Kodak camera, he made it possible for any
person to take pictures without any assistance. This was the opportunity that
was utilized efficiently by Eastman and he marketed the product right to
increase its sales.
Figure 1: Wikipedia.com
In
the above figure, the advertisement of the Kodak camera is portrayed. The
marketing message targeted at the consumers relays the information that
customers don’t have to rely on any other person to take photographs. By using
this camera, people can easily take photographs and this advertisement proved
to be quite effective as sales grew rapidly for Kodak. Similar advertisements
were used by the firm and it resulted in an immense increase in sales. In 1962,
the sales of Kodak reached more than one billion dollars.
Marketing Mix Analysis of
Myopia
Figure 2
Following is the marketing mix utilized
by Kodak:
Product
of Myopia
As
explained above, Kodak is one of the leading brands which focus on imaging
devices, printer, and digital cameras. In the marketing mix of the
organization, there is a broad range of products. Currently, the organization
offers products in the form of digital enterprise and offerings which includes
printing equipment, inkjet printers, and its associated accessories. Digital
printing solutions are offered by Kodak in terms of commercial systems of
printing and press feeds such as commercial sheet feeds, VersaMark, and
Prosper. Some of the most important products of Kodak include Kodak PalmPix,
Kodak DVC series, Easy Share Series of Kodak, and DC series of Kodak.
Price of Myopia
When
it comes to pricing, Kodak has been a leader in the photography industry. A
significant strategy which is implemented by Kodak is razor and blade for all
of its printers. In this strategy, the printer prices would be higher but the
cartridge ink would be lower. This was a significant strategy that led to
marketing myopia.The printer’s prices has actually been higher in comparison
with its competitors but has been lower in terms of ink. After venturing into
the segment of digital photography, Kodak has always been a follower of market
because of increased competitors by renowned players in the sector of
photography. Generally, a multipoint strategy of pricing has been adopted by
Kodak in its marketing mix.
Place of Myopia
Kodak
actually has a powerful network of distribution over the world and has a unique
brand image because of its fame in the segment of photography. For Kodak
products, there are several distributors and retailers which also involve the
market of films and printers. Another significant area which has bene utilized
by Kodak for selling products include the online website and ecommerce. This
proved to be quite beneficial for the organization.
Promotion
of Myopia
The
brand of Kodak has significant popularity for products associated with photography
and has utilized this popularity in several advertisements, promotions, and
campaigns. All media forms have been utilized by the organization for
communicating its message with the public. The major targeted audience for its
photography has been photography enthusiasts and youth. In order to lead the
“So Kodak” campaign, various artists were engaged by it who have a large
following base. Through the use of these strategies, Kodak has been effective
in increasing the sales of its products and attracting customers (Kerin & Hartley, 2015).
STP (Segmenting-targeting-positioning)
Following is the STP for Kodak:
Segmentation: There
are three marketing segmentations utilized by Kodak for attracting customers
and selling its products. These include demographic, psychological, and
geographic segmentations. Kodak targeted families and young people who liked
taking photographs but could not take them without the assistance of an expert.
Considering the psychological segmentation, those people were targeted who had
families, needed to store memories with them, and those people who just liked
taking photographs. The market was segmented based on demographics as well. For
instance, the first country which was targeted by Kodak included the United
States of America. With time, its reach expanded and it began to sell products
in other nations as well.
Targeting: Kodak
targeted two types of people including families and young people. Families were
targeted by Kodak who needed to take photographs with their children but could
not do it because taking photographs was not easy. In addition to families,
young people were targeted by Kodak who had an interest in photography. These
were the only two types of customers targeted by the firm. Children and old
people were not targeted by the firm as they could not use cameras but the firm
had certainly made it easier for the firm to take photographs without needing
assistance.
Positioning: Out
of all the components in marketing process and STP, two components played the
most important parts. These elements included positioning and price due to
which Kodak not only lost its position but also became bankrupt. The price was
kept significantly high for its products while positioning had become weak with
the emergence of Fuji. Although the marketing of company had been effective in
the past, it had become weak when Fuji emerged because it offered cheaper
prices for its products compared to Kodak. The quality was same and the price
was cheaper for Fuji products. Due to it, the positioning of Kodak grew weak
and it began to experience a decline in the sales (Baker & Saren, 2016).
Marketing Strategy
of Myopia
The
marketing strategy of Kodak was effective until the emergence of Fuji which
provided similar quality products at a cheaper price. For instance, consumers
began to purchase products from Fuji because the color film produced by Fuji
was twenty-percent cheaper than color film of Kodak. Instead of competing with Fuji
by decreasing the price, Kodak continued to launch new products while its sales
were not increasing and it only led to the downfall of the organization.
In
addition to not decreasing the costs, Kodak also didn’t take the advantage of
social media. It launched Ofoto for printing digital pictures but it was
ineffective because rather than serving for the purpose of sharing pictures,
the organization tried to not benefit the people but increase its sales and
this intensified the marketing myopia. Individuals realized what the
organization was attempting to do and its sales were decreased even more. With
the introduction of online photo sharing, Kodak was inefficient in realizing
that this was a method of opening a new business and not expanding the business
of printing. Since the organization didn’t realize this and continued to use
this as a method of increasing sales. This strategy proved to be ineffective
and the organization didn’t change it.
Even
with the support of marketing, Kodak couldn’t increase its sales and acquire
the trust of their customers. Even with new innovations, the sales couldn’t
increase and this resulted in its bankruptcy. Rather than changing its
strategy, the firm continued to produce products on the same strategy and it
proved to be inefficient (Baker, Marketing strategy and management. , 2014).
Source: Slideshare.net
2) Recommendation and Lesson to Avoid
Marketing Myopia
Providing
the value to customers of Myopia
Successful companies
require getting safe from the Marketing Myopia; several strategies can be
focused by the companies so that there may not be issues and companies get the
benefits in the future. However, through providing the value to the product and
through focusing on the customer choice it is better to shifting company
perspective. In this way, the product and companies can be successful in the
market.
Don’t adapt just
yourself but also your product, there is the need to provide value to the
product or service to market so it can be useful to people and the product
should be according to the requirement. As in the case of Kodak, there was only
focus on the product but not on the customer mind as they wanted the
advancement in the product. There should be increased in the product’s value
for the consumer
Develop
buyer personas of Myopia
There should be
semi-fictional representations of the product as the product should have more
detail and features that are important in the market. Personas may be
identified as the customer demographics and geographic data including their
choice about the products related to their place. However, it is needed to
focus that how to identify the customers and how to reach them. While
developing the new feature of the product there is the need to focus on the
demand that how the consumers think about the product. There could be a focus
on the gender, age, and location of the customers (Levitt & Levitt, 2008).
Future
challenges, goals, and needs of Myopia
There is the need to
focus or keep an eye on the future; for example, there is the need to focus on
the future aspects that how the product can get success in the market. If
competitors company change or make advancement in the product then what can
happen to the demand. In this way, it could be said that Kodak did not focus on
the future aspects while offering the services of the product; the company did
not shape the strategy according to the future aspect. The company initiated
sale processes just to sell the product; there was no focus on the
market-leading business B2B etc.
Shape
your marketing strategy according to the digital age
In this way, the best
example of Kodak’s largest retailer photo finishers, which was an electronic
camera, can be given. As the company didn’t focus or concerned about digital
photography like other companies and did not accept the digital age as required
(Mui, 2012).
Therefore, issues faced by the company relevant to the digital age. The
products need to be faster or more convenient. Digital means disruption, it
means that the company needs to add the features and need to make the product
through focuses on the fresh changes. Moreover, learning new skills need to be
identified that should be successful in social media platforms and help the
brand to position itself in the consumer's mind.
Never
Stop Evolving of Myopia
There is the need to
evolve and explore new options example, the companies who want to get safe from
the Marketing Myopia should admire the changes according to the trends, and
competition, keyword popularity, etc. as there should be focus on the product
that how it could get famous by the introduction of new social media platforms.
There should be a focus on social media algorithms so that maximum customers
can know about the products and relevant services. Online content, paid search
engines and social media are the best options.
Listen
to the Experts of Myopia
Experts should be
hired for the development of the industry communities, websites, and blogs so
that the product becomes up to date and become famous in the people or
customers. There is a need to get adapted or customized recommendations from
the experts so companies get safe from the Marketing Myopia and can make
improvements according to customers' demands and web marketing.
Recommendations
of Myopia
There
is some recommendation for marketing myopia. From the example of Kodak, it can
be seen that this company was completely unable to move with the new market
trend. This company was just focusing on its sales, not on the demand of the
customer. If any company wanted to stay in the market, then they must have to
move with the new trends. The company has to follow such trends that will give
a huge advantage to the company in the future. Furthermore, the company has to
make a suitable changing according to the demand of the customers. If your
company is focusing on the demand of their customers and making changes
according to them, then it will be extremely easy for them to stay in the
market for a long period of time. Another thing is that the company must have
to focus on the quality of its products. If they are underestimating the
quality and just focusing on the sales, then it will put an end on the
company’s future sales. Therefore the company has to maintain the reasonable
quality of their products.
Conclusion
of Myopia
It can be concluded
that Marketing Myopia of Kodak was the classic mistake by the company because
the company focuses on selling products rather than a business. However, there
was only focus to make the sales and in this way, Kodak failed to adopt the new
consumer attitudes to a new marketplace and was focused on the inward-looking
approach to marketing. Analyzing the marketing mix, it is known that the
company focuses on the higher prices in comparison and focused on several
advertisements, promotions just to make the profit rather than attracting the
customers and making long-term rapport with them. It is concluded that if the
company need to increase its sales and if want a long-term relationship with
customers then there should focus on the learning new skills and stay in touch
with the social media to get consumers and position itself efficiently in the
consumer's mind.
References
of Myopia
Baker, M. J. (2014). Marketing strategy and management. . Macmillan
International Higher Education.
Baker, M. J., & Saren, M. (2016). Marketing theory: a student text.
Sage.
Dan, A. (2012). Kodak Failed By Asking The Wrong Marketing Question.
Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/avidan/2012/01/23/kodak-failed-by-asking-the-wrong-marketing-question/#49273edc3d47
Kerin, R., & Hartley, S. (2015). Marketing: the core.
McGraw-Hill.
Levitt, T., & Levitt, T. (2008). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business
Press.
Mui, C. (2012). How Kodak Failed. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2012/01/18/how-kodak-failed/#837adc76f27a
Pahwa, A. (2019). Marketing Myopia. Retrieved from
https://www.feedough.com/marketing-myopia/