Communicating and implementing existing policies at WKNC

According to Pattberg, Philipp (2005), daily activities which conduct in the non-profit organizations are monitored by an executive director and practiced out by the staff and workers. The lack of information from the organizations about the environmental performance claimed to be a serious risk which considered by the social shareholders along with their clients in non-profit organizations. The fact is that both the non-profit organizations and also advocacy societies did not seem to provide the need for a developed social asset society. Even though the information arrived from the non-profit organizations along with the advocacy society which presents the progressive public relations services rather than considerable information and addressing their precise constituencies as well. Therefore, to communicate, develop, and implement the plan, the non-profit organizations usually participate in various committees which set up by the board (Pattberg, 2005).

 Don Taylor explained that as a non-profit organization, Weston King Neighbourhood Centre and also other non-profit organization such as The Canadian Red Cross Society totally depend on the board policies to give the directions they need for the work of board along with the management as well. The structure could be described as; the board is completely responsible for assigning the policy, while the management has the responsibility to put the policies into day-to-day practice. The board has the authority to monitor whether the organization achieves their objections or not along with the executives from the board assigned to support the management in carrying out the policies made into practice (Taylor)

The important point to communicate and implement the policies in non-profit organizations according to Peter Drucker (2012), is to effective the governance and make the board active such as, how the executives and directors will work along with the management staff in non-profit organizations and also how the board attitude towards to put the policies and values into practice in the organizations. Further, the substantial and essential feature of the implementation of the policy, policy requires support from the government to sustain its perceptibility and consequence in the case of a varying socioeconomic environment. The objectives of the policy must not be destabilized by the appearance of contradictory policies from public policies. Also to that, variations which occur in the assets and approaches of external investors also take part. Solid intermediate organizations must have strong assets, affiliation, and skill as well to place themselves as appropriate and essential contributors in the implementation progress of the policy. Many of the policies and decisions from the non-profit organizations made from the board named with “Execute Limitations,” where the board focuses on developing the external tendency and challenges which influenced the capability of the non-profit organizations in order to achieve their mission and on revenues for societies functioned as well (Drucker, 2012).

Ken Rasmussen (2003) said that, in non-profit organizations, there are five phases for the implementation of the policy mentioned as the productivities in each section, the obedience of both internal and external objective societies to practice the decisions, definite influence of assistance decisions, apparent influence from the decisions, and also the governmental adjustment scheme from the original policy. However, it does not matter how good a policy formed for the formal progress of decision making, the main key to achieving the objectives is dependent on the support of the executives, board, and also the staff in the process of implementing the policy. The implementation process of the policy will be influenced by the scope to which occasions for involvement by objective society agents are shaped over and done with official media of decision making and self-governing estimation revisions. In Canada, most non-profit organizations have to face the struggle to both, form or engage with any policy differences. The policies still has to through a long way of implementation if the board societies meet the terms in which there is no serious “subversion” of the productivities from the policy and there is a vibrant fundamental relation in the middle of the anticipated variations along with the objectives of the policy as well (Rasmussen, Malloy, & Agarwal, 2003).

Thomann (2016) explained that the process to implement the policy in non-profit organizations starts with the assurance from directors of the board side to side with the leadership team. The progress of implementing the policies which provide contributions and nonprofits an occasion to establish this obligation. Non-profit organizations desiring to be attributed requisite to get the various policies and procedures in place. And, the policies and procedures also should be written clearly and understandable along with direct language to make the workers able to simply understand the policies (Thomann, Lieberherr, & Ingold, 2016).