Interpretive
analysis based on primary source documents of "Bartolomé de Las Casas
Argues for the American Indians,” “Nathaniel Bacon: Manifesto Concerning the
Troubles in Virginia, 1676,” and “Eliza Lucas Challenges Traditional Plantation
Life”.
Evidence and argument on History
The
Bartolome de Las Casas debates the subjugation of Spanish historian and
Dominican missionary. The work was first related to the oppression of indigenous
people and Europeans and it was about the call for the abolition of slavery.
The American Indians were considered in the argument for the treatment offered
by Sepulveda rationalized Spanish treatment. The argument was related to the
development and benefits of the new world. The case analyzes the Bible and
Canon law in which Las Casas responded as “All the world is human” (Loomba & Burton, 2007). The fight of
Bartolome De Las Casas was to reduce the oppression of indigenous people and
American and it was mainly conducted for the abolition of slavery. The council
was first decided for the rights of Spanish Colonists and for the rights of
enslaved Indians to take the land back. Las Casas was keenly related to the
characterization of indigenous people as they were human beings and the objects
under consideration were material wealth (Loomba & Burton, 2007). They were highly
passionate to remove slavery and to saw the human beings as participated in the
colonization of Cuba. The participants were working for the colonization of
Cuba and they were victims of slavery as human beings. The role of Bartolome De
Las Casas was recognized in the history of the United States of America. He was
serving as a public officer and soldier and had worked in various places. He
was deeply concerned about the plight of Indians and in 1540 went back to Spain
(Kurian, 2011).
The
chapter under analysis elaborate different terms and characterizations of
Bartolome de Las Casas. Initially, the history and evolution in Spanish culture
are discussed. After that, the role of Native American Indians as human beings
is considered. The argument was done by a respected scholar named as Juan Gines
De Sepulveda on the behalf of Indians. In this case, the imperial land was
granted with the full complement to the labourers. The meeting was between the
king and heads of the church. Unlike the many other people of that time, Las
Casas was seriously doing his religious duties.
In
1676, Nathaniel Bacon was leading the rebellion and all of it was against the
Virginia Royal Governor named as Sir William Berkeley. The rebellion was in the
house of Burgesses in Virginia. In the process of rebellion, Bacon further
issued the Manifesto Concerning the recent and actual troubles of Virginia. At
this point, they outlined the grievance. The main cause of Bacon's rebellion
was the combination of different major factors because the colony was
experiencing a lot of problems (Clayton, 2009). As a result of Bacon rebellion, the
biggest effect was observed on the labour of Virginia as well as the
neighbouring colonies of Virginia. The people of Virginia were turned away in
the peaceful state for the indentured servants and they began to live
peacefully (Loomba & Burton, 2007). The frontier
Rebellion was mainly joined by the indentured servants both the white and the
black servants. Both of them were united to deal with the causes that alarm the
ruling classes. About the Bacon rebellion, the historian believes that the
rebellion was hastened together, and they had hardened the racial lines that
were associated with slavery and control over the colony of the poor. The Bacon
Laws were introduced to deal with the series of reforms, and it measured the
colonial assembly of Virginia on June 23, 1676, after the Nathaniel Bacon
invaded the Jamestown. The mission of assembly was to fight for the rights of
Indians (Loomba & Burton, 2007; Kurian, 2011).
The
chapter under consideration in the present work deals with the historical
figures and clear statements of the motives. The best example is the Nathaniel
Bacon as he has never settled down for future generations and issued a ringing
statement for the grievance suffering from loyal followers. In the case of
readers, the declaration of the people was designed to persuade the readers for
the rebellion and to ensure that the bacon hailed as a defender for the rights
of people and liberties. In the case, the virtue is measured under the
principles of morality, justice, and goodness. They were considered as rebels
under the danger of high imputations. The several bulls were loud and endanger
the defence of brethren. In different sections of the chapter, Bacon reminds
the readers that the planters were entered in Virginia as poor people instead
of being gentlemen. Therefore, they were not a better follower. The question
raised while going back in the history is "What Drove the Bacon to become
Rebel?". The studies show that there were many frontiers of becoming
rebels. The government of Virginia was monopolizing the coastal land and at the
same time, they were willing to provide relief to the struggling fellow
colonists. Under the whole scenario, Bacon along with his followers resented
the followers to collect information and to keep the Indians safe from the
attack. The people of Virginia show their sympathy towards the native
population that was uprooting (Clayton, 2009).
The
work related to the Eliza Lucas Challenges along with the Traditional
Plantation Life is considered in the section. The change in agriculture and the
colonial system was her main concern for South Carolina. The indigo was
developed to measure cultivation, processing, and revolutionary war. Eliza
Pinckney was the first women of the 20th century that was inducted
in the South Carolina business hall of Fame (Loomba & Burton, 2007). The present work considers
the role of Eliza Lucas in South Carolina. She was a confident daughter and
worked for the prosperity of her people. In the early years of her life, she
busied herself in the daily life routines like working on the selling crops,
paying bills, and planting. In her routine, she was gruelling with the daily
schedule. In the American English world,
the colonist was struggling to adapt more creativity and to deal with the
circumstances. The old traditions and values were providing strong connections
with the people and places of the homeland. The Indian population in that era
was producing violence, atrocities, and bloodshed. After that, at the end of
the seventeenth century, the colonies were founded. Father of Eliza had
encouraged most of the non-traditional skills of his daughter. With advancing
the ages, Eliza stubbornly kept the independence that her father had nurtured.
She was finally married to the respected and old friend and kept her attention
to the domestic concerns. At this point, she rejected the traditional notion in
which children of that time were buried. She made a revolutionary struggle that
turned to her plantation (Velissariou, 2002).
Conclusion of History
The
main objective of the present work was to consider three case studies including
“Bartolomé de Las Casas Argues for the American Indians,” “Nathaniel Bacon:
Manifesto Concerning the Troubles in Virginia, 1676,” and “Eliza Lucas
Challenges Traditional Plantation Life”. The whole discussion is about the
learning outcomes and how it can be used for the further development of the
colonial system.
References of History
Clayton, L. (2009). Bartolomé de las Casas: A
biography. biography, 05(03), 01-10.
Kurian, G. T. (2011). Las Casas, Bartolomé
de (1484–1566). The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization, 06(01),
01-10.
Loomba, A., & Burton, J. (2007).
Bartolomé De Las Casas (1474–1566). Race in Early Modern England, 01(02),
111-113.
Velissariou, A. (2002). “’Tis Pity That
When Laws Are Faulty They Should Not Be Mended or Abolisht’: Authority,
Legitimation, and Honor in Aphra Behn’s The Widdow Ranter.”. Papers on
Language and Literature, 38(02), 137-166.